Evaluation of Risk Management Practice in the Nigeria Construction Industry
Open accessAbstract
The construction industry is an essential contributor to a country’s economic growth. Unfortunately, the sector's contribution to the economy is hindered by numerous risk surrounding a construction project. Despite the harmful effect of construction risk, it cannot be eliminated but it can only be managed. Therefore, this study aimed at evaluating the practice adopted for managing construction risk within Nigeria construction industry. The quantitative research approach was adopted, and a descriptive study was selected because it gives an accurate account of the characteristics, for example, the behaviour, opinions, abilities, beliefs and knowledge of a situation or group. The questionnaire was sent out to 200 respondents out of which a total of 150 questionnaires were valid. All the valid questionnaires were analysed using SPSS v23 adopting the exploratory factor analysis method. The findings showed that just like developed countries the Nigeria construction industry adopt the best practice of risk management in construction projects. These practices include risk identification, assessment, response and control. The exploratory factor analysis revealed that under risk identification the practice adopted by the construction professionals is dived into information sourcing and history of the project. Concerning risk assessment, the practice comprises of event analysis and creating a picture of the project. The method adopted for risk response includes generating a risk reduction methodology, establishing risk management back up plan and shifting the risk to a third party. Whereas for risk control the practice consists of enhancing construction project quality and improving the program plan of the construction project. The study contributes to the better management of construction project risk in Nigeria.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several studies on the impact of risk management on project performance were reviewed but none focused specifically on the impact of risk management strategies for managing political, security and communication risks on project performance.
“However, several studies on the impact of risk management on project performance were reviewed but non focused, specifically, on the impact of risk management strategies for managing political, security and communication risks on project performance.”
From Investigating the Impact of Risk Management on Project Performance in Construction Industry: Evidence from Nigeria (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
Risk management practice is still at infant stage in the Nigeria construction industry due to knowledge gap and inadequate experienced manpower to handle the processes of risk management.
“The reasons why risk management practice is still at infant stage in the Nigeria construction industry is due to knowledge gap and inadequate experienced manpower to handle the processes of risk management [20].”
From Investigating the Impact of Risk Management on Project Performance in Construction Industry: Evidence from Nigeria (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
The few studies conducted focused on examining the practices adopted for managing risks in the Nigeria Construction Industry, the impact of cost control on risk management, sustainable risk management, and examining the risk management practices in the Nigeria Construction Industry.
“The few studies conducted focused on examining the practices adopted for managing risks in the Nigeria Construction Industry [20], the impact of cost control on risk management [9], sustainable risk management [15], examining the risk management practices in the Nigeria Construction Industry [2].”
From Investigating the Impact of Risk Management on Project Performance in Construction Industry: Evidence from Nigeria (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
Cites
Adeleke, A. Q., Bahaudin, A. Y., Kamaruddeen, A. M., Bamgbade, J. A., Salimon, M. G., Khan, M. W. A., & Sorooshian, S. (2018) · Safety and Health at Work · doi:10.1016/j.shaw.2017.05.004 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ahmed Bukar, A., & Abbas Ibrahim, U. (2021) · Science Journal of Business and Management · doi:10.11648/j.sjbm.20210903.20 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ugwu, M. C., Osunsanmi, T. O., & Aigbavboa, C. O.
- Affiliations
- University of Johannesburg (ZA)
- Venue
- Modular and Offsite Construction (MOC) Summit Proceedings
- Publisher
- University of Alberta Libraries
- Published
- 2019-05-24
- Pages
- 373-380
- ISSN
- 2562-5438 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2953706728
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 1.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Modular and Offsite Construction (MOC) Summit Proceedings (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- University of Johannesburg
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Construction Project Management and Performance
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Value Engineering and Management
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Radiological and Ultrasound Technology › Occupational Health and Safety Research
- Keywords
- construction risk management, construction projects, risk identification, risk assessment, risk response, risk control, Nigeria construction industry, construction professionals, risk transfer, project quality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review