The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Impact of Academic Library Resources on First-Year Students’ Learning Outcomes
Abstract
In this article, a team from the University of Minnesota presents the findings of their recent study of first-year students’ use of academic library resources and their learning outcomes. By examining student-reported feedback about library use (checking out books, using electronic resources, engaging in reference services, etc.) and about high-level learning outcomes (critical thinking and analytical skills, writing skills, and reading comprehension), the authors argue that the use of library resources does play a role in students’ development of learning outcomes.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Group size thresholds were established using G*Power 3 using an a priori power analysis.
“Group size thresholds were established using G*Power 3 using an a priori power analysis.28”
From Quantifying Library Engagement: Aligning Library, Institutional, and Student Success Data (2020) · cites this paper as [28]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quantifying Library Engagement: Aligning Library, Institutional, and Student Success Data
Croxton, R., & Moore, A. (2020) · College & Research Libraries · doi:10.5860/crl.81.3.399 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Soria, K., Peterson, K., Fransen, J., & Nackerud, S.
- Venue
- Research Library Issues
- Publisher
- Association of Research Libraries
- Published
- 2017-03-14
- Issue
- 290
- ISSN
- 1947-4911 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2603225258
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 18.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Research Library Issues (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Collection Development and Digital Resources
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Administration
- Keywords
- academic library resources, first-year students, learning outcomes, library use, reference services, electronic resources, critical thinking, analytical skills, writing skills, reading comprehension, student feedback
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
