The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reproducibility of Tumor Uptake Heterogeneity Characterization Through Textural Feature Analysis in 18F-FDG PET
Open accessAbstract
UNLABELLED: (18)F-FDG PET measurement of standardized uptake value (SUV) is increasingly used for monitoring therapy response and predicting outcome. Alternative parameters computed through textural analysis were recently proposed to quantify the heterogeneity of tracer uptake by tumors as a significant predictor of response. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility of these heterogeneity measurements. METHODS: Double baseline (18)F-FDG PET scans were acquired within 4 d of each other for 16 patients before any treatment was considered. A Bland-Altman analysis was performed on 8 parameters based on histogram measurements and 17 parameters based on textural heterogeneity features after discretization with values between 8 and 128. RESULTS: The reproducibility of maximum and mean SUV was similar to that in previously reported studies, with a mean percentage difference of 4.7% ± 19.5% and 5.5% ± 21.2%, respectively. By comparison, better reproducibility was measured for some textural features describing local heterogeneity of tracer uptake, such as entropy and homogeneity, with a mean percentage difference of -2% ± 5.4% and 1.8% ± 11.5%, respectively. Several regional heterogeneity parameters such as variability in the intensity and size of regions of homogeneous activity distribution had reproducibility similar to that of SUV measurements, with 95% confidence intervals of -22.5% to 3.1% and -1.1% to 23.5%, respectively. These parameters were largely insensitive to the discretization range. CONCLUSION: Several parameters derived from textural analysis describing heterogeneity of tracer uptake by tumors on local and regional scales had reproducibility similar to or better than that of simple SUV measurements. These reproducibility results suggest that these (18)F-FDG PET-derived parameters, which have already been shown to have predictive and prognostic value in certain cancer models, may be used to monitor therapy response and predict patient outcome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965
Textural Features for Image Classification
Haralick, R. M., Shanmugam, K., & Dinstein, I. (1973) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tsmc.1973.4309314 · Cited by 22,886
Cited by
Computational Radiomics System to Decode the Radiographic Phenotype
(2017) · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-17-0339 · Cited by 6,593
Mayerhoefer, M. E., Materka, A., Langs, G., Häggström, I., Szczypiński, P., Gibbs, P., & Cook, G. (2020) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.118.222893 · Cited by 1,777
Imaging Intratumor Heterogeneity: Role in Therapy Response, Resistance, and Clinical Outcome
O'Connor, J. P. B., Rose, C. J., Waterton, J. C., Carano, R. A. D., Parker, G. J. M., & Jackson, A. (2015) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-0990 · Cited by 677
Quantifying tumour heterogeneity in 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging by texture analysis
Chicklore, S., Goh, V., Siddique, M., Roy, A., Marsden, P. K., & Cook, G. J. R. (2013) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-012-2247-0 · Cited by 488
Hatt, M., Majdoub, M., Vallières, M., Tixier, F., Le Rest, C. C., Groheux, D., Hindié, E., Martineau, A., Pradier, O., Hustinx, R., et al. (2015) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.114.144055 · Cited by 438
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Tixier, F., Hatt, M., Le Rest, C. C., Le Pogam, A., Corcos, L., & Visvikis, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Nuclear Medicine
- Publisher
- Society of Nuclear Medicine
- Published
- 2012-03-27
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 693-700
- ISSN
- 0161-5505 (ISSN-L)
- 2159-662X
- OpenAlex
- W2099835501
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reproducibility of Tumor Uptake Heterogeneity Characterization Through Textural Feature Analysis in 18F-FDG PET. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2967/jnumed.111.099127
- The paper
- Tixier, F., Hatt, M., Le Rest, C. C., Le Pogam, A., Corcos, L., & Visvikis, D. (2012). Reproducibility of Tumor Uptake Heterogeneity Characterization Through Textural Feature Analysis in 18F-FDG PET. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.111.099127
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.