The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
177Lu-Labeled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Radioligand Therapy of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Safety and Efficacy
Open accessAbstract
UNLABELLED: The objective of this study was to analyze the safety and efficacy of the (177)Lu-labeled DOTAGA-based prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligand (177)Lu-DOTAGA-(I-y)fk(Sub-KuE) ((177)Lu-PSMA) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). METHODS: Fifty-six mCRPC patients underwent PSMA radioligand therapy (RLT) with (177)Lu-PSMA. (68)Ga-PSMA-(N,N'-bis-[2-hydroxy-5-(carboxyethyl)benzyl]ethylenediamine-N,N'-diacetic acid) ((68)Ga-PSMA) PET/CT was used for patient selection and follow-up after PSMA RLT. Hematologic status, renal function, and serum prostate-specific antigen levels were documented before and after therapy. Dosimetry was performed in 30 patients. RESULTS: (177)Lu-PSMA demonstrated high absorbed tumor doses (median, 3.3 mGy/MBq) compared with the levels in normal organs. Parotid glands received higher doses (1.3 mGy/MBq) than kidneys (0.8 mGy/MBq). All patients tolerated the therapy without any acute adverse effects. Except for mild reversible xerostomia in 2 patients, no long-term side effects were observed. There was a small but statistically significant reduction in erythrocyte and leukocyte counts; only the reduction in erythrocyte counts decreased slightly below the reference range. No thrombocytopenia occurred. The severity of pain was significantly reduced in 2 of 6 patients (33.3%). A decrease in prostate-specific antigen levels was noted in 45 of 56 patients (80.4%). Of 25 patients monitored for at least 6 mo after 2 or more PSMA RLT cycles, a molecular response evaluation ((68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT) revealed partial remission in 14, stable disease in 2, and progressive disease in 9 patients. Contrast-enhanced CT revealed partial remission in 5, stable disease in 13, and progressive disease in 7 patients. The median progression-free survival was 13.7 mo, and the median overall survival was not reached during follow-up for 28 mo. CONCLUSION: PSMA RLT with (177)Lu-PSMA is feasible, safe, and effective in end-stage progressive mCRPC with appropriate selection and follow-up of patients by (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT through application of the concept of theranostics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
Eisenhauer, E. A., Therasse, P., Bogaerts, J., Schwartz, L. H., Sargent, D., Ford, R., Dancey, J., Arbuck, S., Gwyther, S., Mooney, M., et al. (2009) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026 · Cited by 29,534
Sipuleucel-T Immunotherapy for Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Kantoff, P. W., Higano, C. S., Shore, N. D., Berger, E. R., Small, E. J., Penson, D. F., Redfern, C. H., Ferrari, A. C., Dreicer, R., Sims, R. B., et al. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1001294 · Cited by 5,572
Alpha Emitter Radium-223 and Survival in Metastatic Prostate Cancer
Parker, C., Nilsson, S., Heinrich, D., Helle, S. I., O'Sullivan, J. M., Fosså, S. D., Chodacki, A., Wiechno, P., Logue, J., Seke, M., et al. (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1213755 · Cited by 3,408
Cited by
68Ga-PSMA PET/CT: Joint EANM and SNMMI procedure guideline for prostate cancer imaging: version 1.0
Fendler, W. P., Eiber, M., Beheshti, M., Bomanji, J., Ceci, F., Cho, S., Giesel, F., Haberkorn, U., Hope, T. A., Kopka, K., et al. (2017) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-017-3670-z · Cited by 750
Self-citationViolet, J., Jackson, P., Ferdinandus, J., Sandhu, S., Akhurst, T., Iravani, A., Kong, G., Kumar, A. R., Thang, S. P., Eu, P., et al. (2019) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.118.219352 · Cited by 504
Potent candidates for Targeted Auger Therapy: Production and radiochemical considerations
Filosofov, D., Kurakina, E., & Radchenko, V. (2021) · Nuclear Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2020.12.001 · Cited by 341
Heck, M. M., Tauber, R., Schwaiger, S., Retz, M., D’Alessandria, C., Maurer, T., Gafita, A., Wester, H.-J., Gschwend, J. E., Weber, W. A., et al. (2019) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.016 · Cited by 298
Self-citationViolet, J., Sandhu, S., Iravani, A., Ferdinandus, J., Thang, S.-P., Kong, G., Kumar, A. R., Akhurst, T., Pattison, D., Beaulieu, A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.119.236414 · Cited by 292
Metadata
- Authors
- Baum, R. P., Kulkarni, H. R., Schuchardt, C., Singh, A., Wirtz, M., Wiessalla, S., Schottelius, M., Mueller, D., Klette, I., & Wester, H.-J.
- Venue
- Journal of Nuclear Medicine
- Publisher
- Society of Nuclear Medicine
- Published
- 2016-01-21
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1006-1013
- ISSN
- 0161-5505 (ISSN-L)
- 2159-662X
- OpenAlex
- W2303817381
- Cited by
- 525
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 59.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 177Lu-Labeled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Radioligand Therapy of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Safety and Efficacy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2967/jnumed.115.168443
- The paper
- Baum, R. P., Kulkarni, H. R., Schuchardt, C., Singh, A., Wirtz, M., Wiessalla, S., Schottelius, M., Mueller, D., Klette, I., & Wester, H.-J. (2016). 177Lu-Labeled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Radioligand Therapy of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Safety and Efficacy. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.168443
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.