The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Delayed coupling theory of vertebrate segmentation
Open accessAbstract
Rhythmic and sequential subdivision of the elongating vertebrate embryonic body axis into morphological somites is controlled by an oscillating multicellular genetic network termed the segmentation clock. This clock operates in the presomitic mesoderm (PSM), generating dynamic stripe patterns of oscillatory gene-expression across the field of PSM cells. How these spatial patterns, the clock's collective period, and the underlying cellular-level interactions are related is not understood. A theory encompassing temporal and spatial domains of local and collective aspects of the system is essential to tackle these questions. Our delayed coupling theory achieves this by representing the PSM as an array of phase oscillators, combining four key elements: a frequency profile of oscillators slowing across the PSM; coupling between neighboring oscillators; delay in coupling; and a moving boundary describing embryonic axis elongation. This theory predicts that the segmentation clock's collective period depends on delayed coupling. We derive an expression for pattern wavelength across the PSM and show how this can be used to fit dynamic wildtype gene-expression patterns, revealing the quantitative values of parameters controlling spatial and temporal organization of the oscillators in the system. Our theory can be used to analyze experimental perturbations, thereby identifying roles of genes involved in segmentation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The segmentation clock in mice: interaction between the Wnt and Notch signalling pathways
Rodríguez-González, J. G., Santillán, M., Fowler, A. C., & Mackey, M. C. (2007) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.05.003 · Cited by 41
Cited by
Oates, A. C., Morelli, L. G., & Ares, S. (2012) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.063735 · Cited by 388
Self-citationel Azhar, Y., Schulthess, P., van Oostrom, M. J., Weterings, S. D. C., Meijer, W. H. M., Tsuchida-Straeten, N., Thomas, W. M., Bauer, M., & Sonnen, K. F. (2024) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.202936 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Morelli, L. G., Ares, S., Herrgen, L., Schröter, C., Jülicher, F., & Oates, A. C.
- Venue
- HFSP Journal
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-02
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 55-66
- ISSN
- 1955-205X (ISSN-L)
- 1955-2068
- OpenAlex
- W2089222127
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Delayed coupling theory of vertebrate segmentation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2976/1.3027088
- The paper
- Morelli, L. G., Ares, S., Herrgen, L., Schröter, C., Jülicher, F., & Oates, A. C. (2009). Delayed coupling theory of vertebrate segmentation. HFSP Journal. https://doi.org/10.2976/1.3027088
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.