The Ethics of Autism: Among Them, but Not of Them
Abstract
Understanding autism and the unique ethical questions it raises
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Moral philosophers have often taken autism to be inherently at odds with living a good life.
“Underlying these empirical findings, moral philosophers have often taken autism to be inherently at odds with living a good life (Barnbaum, 2008;Furman & Tuminello, 2015).”
From Neurodiversity, epistemic injustice, and the good human life (2022) · cites this paper as Barnbaum, 2008
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Neurodiversity, epistemic injustice, and the good human life
Chapman, R., & Carel, H. (2022) · Journal of Social Philosophy · doi:10.1111/josp.12456 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Munesue, T., Nakamura, H., Kikuchi, M., Miura, Y., Takeuchi, N., Anme, T., Nanba, E., Adachi, K., Tsubouchi, K., Sai, Y., et al. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00002 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
- Authors
- Barnbaum, D.
- Corresponding author
- Barnbaum, Deborah
- ORCID
- Barnbaum, Deborah
- Venue
- Indiana University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Indiana University Press
- Published
- 2008
- OpenAlex
- W4409477111
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Indiana University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Keywords
- autism spectrum disorder, ethics, ethical considerations, disability ethics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
