The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Who killed Bambi? The role of predation in the neonatal mortality of temperate ungulates
Abstract
A total of 111 papers and reports, coming from 79 major studies and 19 other studies, on neonatal (first summer) mortality of 10 species of northern, temperate ungulates were reviewed. To avoid biases from indirect techniques only studies on radio‐collared neonates and/or their dams were included, apart from a few notable exceptions. Neonatal mortality rates observed for different studies averaged 47% (68 studies) in environments where predators occurred, with predation accounting for an average of 67% (53 studies) of this mortality. No other single cause of mortality exceeded that of predation, which accounted for 0–100% of the mortality recorded in various studies. In contrast, mortality averaged 19% for studies in environments lacking predators. Other prominent causes of mortality were hypothermia/starvation and accidents. Disease was found to play a small role only. The predator species involved varied greatly between study areas, with both medium sized (bobcat Lynx rufus , Canada lynx Lynx canadensis , coyote Canis latrans and red fox Vulpes vulpes ) and large (wolf Canis lupus , mountain lion Felis concolor , black bear Ursus americana and brown bear Ursus arctos ) terrestrial predators preying upon the neonates. Despite the prominent role of predation, little is known about its long‐term compensatory or additive nature, and therefore its impact on population dynamics is unclear. Factors influencing predation rates are poorly understood, although a few studies found significant sex‐biased predation, and effects of weather or juvenile/maternal body condition. Timing of mortality within the first summer varied with the predators involved and the neonatal security strategy of the species, but was not confined to the immediate post‐partum period.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Temporal Variation in Fitness Components and Population Dynamics of Large Herbivores
Gaillard, J.-M., Festa-Bianchet, M., Yoccoz, N. G., Loison, A., & Toïgo, C. (2000) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.367 · Cited by 1,729
Nutrition integrates environmental responses of ungulates.
Parker, K. L., Barboza, P. S., & Gillingham, M. P. (2009) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2009.01528.x · Cited by 686
Environmental stochasticity and population dynamics of large herbivores: a search for mechanisms
Sæther, B.-E. (1997) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(96)10068-9 · Cited by 632
Food regulates the Serengeti wildebeest: a 40-year record.
Mduma, S. A. R., Sinclair, A. R. E., & Hilborn, R. (1999) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00352.x · Cited by 434
Elk calf survival and mortality following wolf restoration to Yellowstone National Park
Barber-Meyer, S. M., Mech, L. D., & White, P. J. (2008) · Wildlife Monographs · doi:10.2193/2008-004 · Cited by 208
Metadata
- Authors
- Linnell, J. D. C., Aanes, R., & Andersen, R.
- Venue
- Wildlife Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-12
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 209-223
- ISSN
- 0909-6396 (ISSN-L)
- 1903-220X
- OpenAlex
- W2283382477
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Who killed Bambi? The role of predation in the neonatal mortality of temperate ungulates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2981/wlb.1995.0026
- The paper
- Linnell, J. D. C., Aanes, R., & Andersen, R. (1995). Who killed Bambi? The role of predation in the neonatal mortality of temperate ungulates. Wildlife Biology. https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.1995.0026
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.