The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Debasing the Currency of Science: The Growing Menace of Predatory Open Access Journals
Open accessAbstract
In recent years, the scientific publishing world has seen the creation and rapid growth of online journals, which do not respect the long-standing gentleman's agreement that has functioned as the primary quality-control mechanism for science: bona fide peer review and editorial oversight. Such predatory journals take advantage of the low cost and ease of online “publishing,” the open access movement, and use feigned associations with international standards and misleading claims of impact factors, aimed at deceiving researchers (especially inexperienced scientists) into believing they are legitimate. We present the history, evolution, and tactics of such journals, as well as recommendations for dealing with this threat to science itself.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor
Garfield, E. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.295.1.90 · Cited by 2,770
Bohannon, J. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.342.6154.60 · Cited by 934
Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics
Shen, C., & Björk, B.-C. (2015) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2 · Cited by 819
Impact factors: use and abuse.
Amin, M., & Mabe, M. A. (2003) · PubMed · Cited by 491
Simons, K. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1165316 · Cited by 178
Publishing Ethics and Predatory Practices: A Dilemma for All Stakeholders of Science Communication
Gasparyan, A. Y., Yessirkepov, M., Diyanova, S. N., & Kitas, G. D. (2015) · Journal of Korean Medical Science · doi:10.3346/jkms.2015.30.8.1010 · Cited by 75
Impacted Science: Impact Is Not Importance
Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2015) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.01593-15 · Cited by 66
Open but Not Free — Publishing in the 21st Century
Frank, M. (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp1211259 · Cited by 54
Researchers Outside APC-Financed Open Access
Burchardt, J. (2014) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/2158244014551714 · Cited by 39
Krizhanovsky, E., & Choong, L. K. (2014) · Open Journal of Ecology · doi:10.4236/oje.2014.411059 · Cited by 7
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What I learned from predatory publishers
Beall, J. (2017) · Biochemia Medica · doi:10.11613/bm.2017.029 · Cited by 306
Self-citationSustainability transformations: socio-political shocks as opportunities for governance transitions
Herrfahrdt-Pähle, E., Schlüter, M., Olsson, P., Folke, C., Gelcich, S., & Pahl‐Wostl, C. (2020) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102097 · Cited by 207
Krawczyk, F., & Kulczycki, E. (2020) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102271 · Cited by 146
Are predatory journals undermining the credibility of science? A bibliometric analysis of citers
Frandsen, T. F. (2017) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2520-x · Cited by 119
Time to stop talking about ‘predatory journals’
Eriksson, S., & Helgesson, G. (2017) · Learned Publishing · doi:10.1002/leap.1135 · Cited by 105
Metadata
- Authors
- Beninger, P. G., Beall, J., & Shumway, S. E.
- Affiliations
- Université de Nantes (FR)
- University of Colorado Denver (US)
- University of Connecticut (US)
- Corresponding author
- Beninger, Peter G.
- Venue
- Journal of Shellfish Research
- Publisher
- National Shellfisheries Association
- Published
- 2016-04
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-5
- ISSN
- 0730-8000 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-6319
- OpenAlex
- W2346218582
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 11.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Journal of Shellfish Research (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Keywords
- predatory journals, open access movement, peer review, editorial oversight, publication ethics, electronic journals
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
