CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3Academic integrity and plagiarismArtificial Intelligence in EducationEthics and Social Impacts of AI

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Academic Integrity in the Era of Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review

Open access
Ebrahim, Omar Oulad, Mhouti, Abderrahim El, Allaoui, Mostafa·2025·Atlantis Highlights in Social Sciences, Education and Humanities
DOI 10.2991/978-2-38476-408-2_9
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

In recent years, the rapid evolution of digital technology; currently, the increasing use of artificial intelligence in educational practices offers new opportunities, including the improvement of personalized learning and assessment.With the emergence of the Covid-19 pandemic, there is a significant surge in various forms of distance learning, which presents challenges related to forms of dishonesty.This poses major challenges to academic integrity.This study addresses the issue of academic integrity in the era of AI.Using a systematic approach, this research aims to examine the depth of the existing literature exploring the relationship between the evolution of AI and academic integrity in the context of distance learning.The study's findings reveal that the use of artificial intelligence applications in academic and educational institutions may raise concerns about the credibility of assessment results and the ethical use of AI.The study also highlights that despite the specific drawbacks of AI, its educational benefits are significant.Finally, the conclusions of this study suggest research directions to anticipate the future developments of universities and schools in an educational context where AI will play a central role.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2991/978-2-38476-408-2_9

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Academic integrity issues constitute the most immediate and broadly debated topic, as research has shown that students extensively employ generative AI tools to finish assignments without permission, generate plagiarized work, and circumvent conventional assessment methods.

    “Academic integrity issues constitute the most immediate and broadly debated topic, as research has shown that students extensively employ generative AI tools to finish assignments without permission, generate plagiarized work, and circumvent conventional assessment methods (Ebrahim, Mhouti and Allaoui, 2025).”

    From A Multi-Dimensional Decision Framework for Evaluating and Selecting AI-Enabled Instructional Technology in U.S. Higher Education (2025) · cites this paper as Ebrahim, Mhouti and Allaoui, 2025

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Multiple studies documented cases where students' ability to perform tasks independently declined after extended application of AI tools.

    “Multiple studies documented cases where students' ability to perform tasks independently declined after extended application of AI tools, which raised concerns about the long-term impact on critical thinking, composition, and problem-solving skills (Ebrahim, Mhouti and Allaoui, 2025).”

    From A Multi-Dimensional Decision Framework for Evaluating and Selecting AI-Enabled Instructional Technology in U.S. Higher Education (2025) · cites this paper as Ebrahim, Mhouti and Allaoui, 2025

    Section 4.2 discusses concerns about assessment credibility and academic integrity, while section 4.1 discusses AI-assisted task completion and students’ autonomy to learn (page numbers unavailable). Neither section reports studies documenting a decline in students’ ability to perform tasks independently after extended AI use. Searches for independent task performance, dependency, extended use, and long-term effects found no passage establishing that claim. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Abulibdeh, A., Zaidan, E., & Abulibdeh, R.: Navigating the confluence of ar- tificial intelligence and education for sustainable development in the era of in- dustry 4.0: Challenges, opportunities, and ethical dimensions. Journal of Cleaner Production 437, 140527 (2024).
  2. Baidoo-Anu, D., & Ansah, L. O.: Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promot- ing teaching and learning. Journal of AI 7(1), 52-62 (2023).
  3. Cooper, H. M.: Scientific Guidelines for Conducting Integrative Research Re- views. Review of Educational Research 52(2), 291-302 (1982).
  4. Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R.: Chatting and cheating: En- suring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228-239 (2023).
  5. Detroz, P., Tessaro, W., Tessaro, W., Younès, N., & Clermont-Auvergne, U. : Edito : Évaluer en temps de pandémie. Évaluer. Journal international de re- cherche en éducation et formation, Numéro Hors-série 1, 1-3 (2020).
  6. Gao, X., & Feng, H. (2023). AI-Driven Productivity Gains: Artificial Intelli- gence and Firm Productivity. Sustainability 15(11), 8934 (2023).
  7. Hodges, C. B., & Kirschner, P. A.: Innovation of Instructional Design and As- sessment in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence. TechTrends 68(1), 195-199 (2024).
  8. Ifelebuegu, A.: Rethinking online assessment strategies: Authenticity versus AI chatbot intervention. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching 6(2), (2023).
  9. Leng, L.: Challenge, integration, and change: ChatGPT and future anatomical education. Medical Education Online 29(1), 2304973 (2024).
  10. Lo, C. K.: What Is the Impact of ChatGPT on Education? A Rapid Review of the Literature. Education Sciences 13(4), 410 (2023).
  11. Mangundu, J.: Exploring drivers of academic integrity violation in e-assess- ments by students during the emergency remote teaching. International Con- ference on Multidisciplinary Research 2022, pp. 70-89 (2022).
  12. Meça, A., & Shkëlzeni, N.: Academic Integrity in the Face of Generative Lan- guage Models, In: Miraz, M.H., Southall, G., Ali, M., Ware, A. (eds.) CONFERENCE 2023, LNICST, vol. 538, PP. 58-70. Springer: Springer Na- ture, Switzerland (2024).
  13. Mijwil, M. M., Hiran, K. K., Doshi, R., Dadhich, M., Al-Mistarehi, A.-H., & Bala, I.: ChatGPT and the Future of Academic Integrity in the Artificial Intel- ligence Era: A New Frontier. Al-Salam Journal for Engineering and Technol- ogy 2(2), 116-127 (2023).
  14. Nkoro, E. C., Nwakanma, C. I., Lee, J.-M., & Kim, D.-S.: Detecting cyber- threats in Metaverse learning platforms using an explainable DNN. Internet of Things 25, 101046 (2024).
  15. Owan, V. J., Abang, K. B., Idika, D. O., Etta, E. O., & Bassey, B. A.: Exploring the potential of artificial intelligence tools in educational measurement and as- sessment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 19(8), em2307 (2023).
  16. Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glan- ville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … McKenzie, J. E.: PRISMA 2020 explana- tion and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372, n160 (2021).
  17. Rakuasa, H., Faris, D. A., & Hidayatullah, M.: Transforming Education in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Challenges and Opportunities in Indonesia, A Literature Review. Journal Education Innovation (JEI) 2(1), 180-186 (2024).
  18. Van Wyk, M. M., Adarkwah, M. A., & Amponsah, S.: Why All the Hype about ChatGPT? Academics' Views of a Chat-based Conversational Learning Strat- egy at an Open Distance e-Learning Institution. Open Praxis 15(3), 214-225 (2023).
  19. Vellanki, S., Mond, S., & Khan, Z.: Promoting Academic Integrity in Re- mote/Online Assessment -EFL Teachers' Perspectives. TESL-EJ 26(4), n4 (2023).
  20. Yu, H.: The application and challenges of ChatGPT in educational transfor- mation: New demands for teachers' roles. Heliyon 10(2), e24289 (2024).
  21. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F.: Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education - where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 16(1), 1-27 (2019).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Ebrahim, O. O., Mhouti, A. E., & Allaoui, M.
Affiliations
Abdelmalek Essaâdi University (MA)
Corresponding author
Ebrahim, Omar Oulad
ORCID
Venue
Atlantis Highlights in Social Sciences, Education and Humanities
Publisher
Atlantis Press SARL
Published
2025
Pages
99-113
ISSN
  • 2667-128X (ISSN-L)
  • 2731-796X
DOI
10.2991/978-2-38476-408-2_9
OpenAlex
W4411464546
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
0.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
Atlantis highlights in social sciences, education and humanities/Atlantis Highlights in Social Sciences, Education and Humanities (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Keywords
academic integrity, artificial intelligence in education, distance education, academic dishonesty, assessment credibility, ethical use of AI, personalized learning, COVID-19 pandemic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review