Cited by 4Sustainable Building Design and AssessmentRecycled Aggregate Concrete PerformanceSustainable Design and Development

Sustainability Through Reuse of Materials and Components in Buildings: An Indonesian Perspective

Open access
Citraningrum, Andika, Iyati, Wasiska, Wardoyo, Jono·2023·Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research

Abstract

Reuse of materials/ components plays a more significant role than recycling because it reduces raw materials and embodied energy at the beginning of construction and minimizes construction waste at the end of the building's life.It is also an embodiment of circular economy in architecture.Although the social, economic, and environmental benefits of reusing materials and components are well established, field practices still need to be established.Few buildings in Indonesia utilize reused materials and components.This study aims to identify public perceptions on the application of materials and components reuse in buildings.Data were collected from the three target research respondents: architects, developerscontractors, and the general public using online questionnaires.The study discovered the potential for reused materials/components in buildings in Indonesia, where there is a high interest in reusing materials/components.The community has also recognized the significance of reuse and its positive environmental impact.Furthermore, there is a favorable opinion of the aesthetic appearance, costs, quality, health risks, and safety of reused materials/components. Barriers in terms of availability, maintenance, and durability require extra attention.Several solutions have also been proposed to increase the application of reused materials/components in buildings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2991/978-94-6463-140-1_24

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. G. Michelini, R. N. Moraes, R. N. Cunha, J. M. H. Costa, and A. R. Ometto, "From Linear to Circular Economy: PSS Conducting the Transition," Procedia CIRP, vol. 64, pp. 2-6, Jan. 2017.
  2. L. H. M. C. Vefago and J. Avellaneda, "Recycling concepts and the index of recyclability for building materials," Resour. Conserv. Recycl., vol. 72, pp. 127-135, Mar. 2013.
  3. M. Gorgolewski, "Designing with reused building components: some challenges," https:// doi.org/10.1080/09613210701559499, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 175-188, Mar. 2008. · DOI · Paper page
  4. S. Munn and V. Soebarto, "The issues of using recycled materials in architecture," in The 38th International Conference of Architectural Science Association ANZAScA "Contexts of architecture," 2004, pp. 10-12.
  5. M. Gorgolewski, Resource salvation: the architecture of reuse. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell, 2017.
  6. M. Arora, F. Raspall, L. Cheah, and A. Silva, "Residential building material stocks and component-level circularity: The case of Singapore," J. Clean. Prod., vol. 216, pp. 239-248, Apr. 2019.
  7. M. Arora, F. Raspall, L. Cheah, and A. Silva, "Buildings and the circular economy: Estimating urban mining, recovery and reuse potential of building components," Resour. Conserv. Recycl., vol. 154, p. 104581, Mar. 2020.
  8. K. Knoth, S. M. Fufa, and E. Seilskjær, "Barriers, success factors, and perspectives for the reuse of construction products in Norway," J. Clean. Prod., vol. 337, p. 130494, Feb. 2022.
  9. R. Jin, B. Li, T. Zhou, D. Wanatowski, and P. Piroozfar, "An empirical study of perceptions towards construction and demolition waste recycling and reuse in China," Resour. Conserv. Recycl., vol. 126, pp. 86-98, Nov. 2017.
  10. W. I. Ervianto, B. W. Soemardi, M. Abduh, and. S., "Kajian Reuse Material Bangunan dalam Konsep Sustainable Construction di Indonesia," J. Tek. Sipil, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 18-27, 2012.
  11. P. Sassi, "Designing buildings to close the material resource loop," in Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers -Engineering Sustainability, 2004, vol. 157, no. 3, pp. 163-171.
  12. M. Condotta and E. Zatta, "Reuse of building elements in the architectural practice and the European regulatory context: Inconsistencies and possible improvements," J. Clean. Prod., vol. 318, p. 128413, Oct. 2021.

Authors
Citraningrum, A., Iyati, W., & Wardoyo, J.
Affiliations
University of Brawijaya (ID)
Corresponding author
Citraningrum, Andika
Venue
Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research
Published
2023
Pages
242-251
ISSN
  • 2352-5428 (ISSN-L)
  • 2731-7854
OpenAlex
W4367459183
Cited by
4
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1
FWCI
3.78
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Advances in economics, business and management research/Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Universitas Brawijaya
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Design and Development
Keywords
material reuse, architectural elements, circular economy, construction waste, embodied energy, public perception, architects, developers, contractors, Indonesia, barriers to reuse, sustainable construction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review