Cited by 13Psychiatry, Mental Health, NeuroscienceComputability, Logic, AI AlgorithmsAI-based Problem Solving and Planning

Towards an Actual Gödel Machine Implementation: a Lesson in Self-Reflective Systems

Steunebrink, Bas R., Schmidhuber, Jürgen·2012·Atlantis Thinking Machines

Abstract

Recently, interest has been revived in self-reflective systems in the context of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). An AGI system should be intelligent enough to be able to reason about its own program code, and make modifications where it sees fit, improving on the initial code written by human programmers. A pertinent example is the Gödel Machine, which employs a proof searcher— in parallel to its regular problem solves duties—to find a self-rewrite of which it can prove that it will be beneficial. Obviously there are technical challenges involved in attaining such a level of self-reflection in an AGI system, but many of them are not widely known or properly appreciated. In this chapter we go back to the theoretical foundations of self-reflection and examine the (often subtle) issues encountered when embarking on actually implementing a self-reflective AGI system in general and a Gödel Machine in particular.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2991/978-94-91216-62-6_10

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steunebrink, B. R., & Schmidhuber, J.
Affiliations
Dalle Molle Institute for Artificial Intelligence Research (CH)
Venue
Atlantis Thinking Machines
Published
2012
Pages
173-195
ISSN
1877-3273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2103519081
Cited by
11
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.14
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Atlantis thinking machines (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
Keywords
artificial general intelligence, proof search, self-modification, implementation barriers, self-reflection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review