Cited by 5Climate Change Policy and EconomicsEnvironmental Sustainability in BusinessSustainable Supply Chain Management

Optimal Choice of Enterprise’s Production Strategy under Constraints of Carbon Quota

Open access
Zheng, Xiping, Guo, Qiang, Li, Zenglu, Zhang, Ting·2018·International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems

Abstract

After analyzing the enterprise's production strategy under the constraints of carbon quota, this paper proposes new mathematical models aiming for the optimal choice of enterprise's production strategy under the monopoly and competitive environments respectively.Combining the neural network optimization theory, then the methods of Nonlinear Programming and Nash Equilibrium in Static Games are used to solve the models to obtain the enterprise's equilibrium quantity, the optimal carbon emission, and the profit of unit product in the low carbon technology.The study found that: under a monopoly environment, enterprises choose technology innovation strategy; under a competitive environment, enterprises use carbon trading strategies whenever carbon trading prices are low or high; however, there is no pure strategy Nash equilibrium when carbon trading prices are in the middle, in this case enterprises prefer to use the production strategies different from the competitor.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2991/ijcis.11.1.94

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-organizing maps have been used to analyze how R&D investment in green technologies changes in response to fuel prices, while a game theoretical framework using neural networks has been used to study optimal production strategies for companies under carbon quotas.

    “For example, self-organizing maps have been used to analyze how R&D investment in green technologies changes in response to fuel prices [55], while a game theoretical framework using neural networks has been used to study the optimal production strategies for companies under carbon quotas [884].”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [884]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Baranzini A, Goldemberg J, Speck S. A future for carbon taxes[J]. Ecological Economics, 2000, 32(3):395-412.
  2. Barker T, Baylis S, Madsen P. AUK Carbon/Energy Tax: The macroeconomics effects [J] . Energy Policy, 1993, 21(3):296 -308.
  3. Hou Y M, Pan D, Liang C Z. Research on production and emission reduction of two-oligopoly in the trading of carbon emission rights [J]. Commercial Research, 2013, 55 (1): 176-182.
  4. Hu Y Q. Operational research,3rd edition[M]. Tsinghua University Press,2007.
  5. Huang S J, Ren Y L, Sun R, et al. Stochastic differential game models of vertical cooperative mitigation in duopoly electricity market [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2014,22(2):101-111.
  6. Jian L I, Qin S U, Li M A, et al. The research of carbon trading model on supply chain under carbon emission constraints [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2016, 24(4):54-62.
  7. Liu C M, Gao Y. Research on carbon emission reduction in China's industrial sector under carbon trading [J]. Soft science, 2016, 30 (3): 85-88.
  8. Todd M J. Computation, Multiplicity, and Comparative Statics of Cournot Equilibria in Integers[J]. Mathematics of Operations Research, 2016, 41(3): 1125-1134.
  9. Wang Q P, Zhao D Z. Revenue-sharing contract of supply chain based on consumer's preference for low carbon products [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2014, 22(9):106-113.
  10. Xie X, Zhao D Z. Research on cooperation strategy of enterprises' carbon emission reduction in low carbon supply chain[J]. Journal of Management Science, 2013, 26(3): 108-119.
  11. Xie Z Y. Economic game theory[M]. Fudan University Press, 2002.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zheng, X., Guo, Q., Li, Z., & Zhang, T.
Affiliations
  • Chengdu University of Technology (CN)
  • Southwest Jiaotong University (CN)
Venue
International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems
Published
2018
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
1268
ISSN
1875-6883 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2897311777
Cited by
5
References
26
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Keywords
carbon quotas, CO2 emissions, manufacturing strategy, emissions trading, monopoly, competitive markets, Nash equilibrium, low-carbon technologies, technological innovation, neural network optimization, nonlinear programming, carbon trading price, equilibrium quantity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review