Cited by 14Forest Management and PolicyForest Biomass Utilization and ManagementSustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis

Forest wood consumption and wood shortage in Pakistan: Estimation and projection through system dynamics

Open access
Nazir, Naila, Olabisi, Laura Schmitt, Ahmad, Salman·2018·The Pakistan Development Review

Abstract

Consumption rates of major forest products such as timber and firewood, place significant strain on wood stock and forest area in Pakistan. With the country's rising population, the consumption of these two major products is increasing because of the growing energy demand, and no alternative products are likely to replace wood consumption in the near future. We apply system dynamics modelling to an analysis of the forestry sector in Pakistan for novel insights into the drivers and future trajectories of wood consumption. The present research is based on time series macroeconomic data from 1990-2010 and projections to 2040 of wood supply, forest area, population growth, wood extraction, wood imports and different uses of wood in the country. The study reveals that there is no significant increase in area under forest, while consumption of firewood and timber has increased. The consumption of firewood is greater than timber consumption in Pakistan, both in percentage share and in total volume of wood consumption. The sustainable supply of wood is less than wood consumption, and with population growth this gap is increasing; wood supply from agricultural lands is a viable option to fill the gap. Keywords: Wood Consumption, Sustainable Wood Supply, Projected Wood Shortage

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.30541/v57i1pp.73-98

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pakistan faces a problem with wood shortages due to very little forest areas and progressing deforestation.

    “Pakistan faces a problem with wood shortages due to very little forest areas and progressing deforestation.”
  • Since Pakistan produces a notable number of bananas, it seems reasonable to replace wood paper with banana BP paper.

    “Since Pakistan produces a notable number of bananas, it seems reasonable to replace wood paper with banana BP paper [133].”

    From Potential Valorization of Banana Production Waste in Developing Countries: Bio-Engineering Aspects (2024) · cites this paper as [133]

    Section III discusses Pakistan’s wood supply and imports of pulp, paper and paperboard, but does not address banana production or banana-based paper. Searches for banana BP paper and alternative paper materials found no passage supporting the proposed replacement. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Agarwal, C., G. M Green, J. Grove, Morgan, Evans, P. Tom, M. Schweik, and Charles (2002) A Review and Assessment of Land-Use Change Models: Dynamics of Space, Time, and Human Choice. (Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-297). Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station. p.
  2. Ahmad, R. (1994) The Environment Today and Its Decay. Pakistan Academy of Rural Development, Peshawar. Journal of Rural Development and Administration 26:3.
  3. Ahmad, S. S., Q. U. A. Abbasi, R. Jabeen, and M. T. Shah (2012) Decline of Conifer Forest Cover in Pakistan: A GIS Approach. Pakistan Journal of Botany 44:2, 511- 514.
  4. Ali and Shah (2004) Local Communities' Access to Forest Resources of Hilkot Watershed, Mansehra. Pakistan Forest Institute, Peshawar. Pakistan Journal of Forestry 52:2.
  5. Ali, B. S. Tanvir, and A. Suleri (2006). Analysis of Myths and Realities of Deforestation in North West Pakistan: Implications for Forestry Extension. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 107-110.
  6. Ayaz, M. and B. A. Wani (2000) Abstract. The Pakistan Journal of Forestry 50: (1-2). Pakistan Forest Institute Peshawar.
  7. Baker, W. L. (1989) A Review of Models in Landscape Change. Landscape Ecology 2:2, 111-133.
  8. Barlas, Y. (1989) Multiple Tests for Validation of System Dynamics Type of Simulation Models. European Journal of Operational Research 42:1, 59-87.
  9. Barlas, Y. (1996) Formal Aspects of Model Validity and Validation in System Dynamics. System Dynamics Review 12:3, 183-210.
  10. Barlas, Y. and S. Carpenter (1990) Philosophical Roots of Model Validation: Two Paradigms. System Dynamics Review 6:2, 148-166.
  11. Burgi, M., Emily W. B. Russell, and M. Glenn (2000) Effects of Post Settlement Human Activities on Forest Composition in the North-Eastern United States: A Comparative Approach. Journal of Biogeography Department of Geological Sciences, Rutgers, University, Newark, NJ 07102, USA, Blackwell Science Ltd.
  12. Burney, N. and N. Akhtar, (1990) Fuel Demand Elasticities in Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review 29: 2, 155-174.
  13. Dasgupta, M. (1986) Forest Management in Darjeeling Hill Area from British Raj to Swaraj (Ed.) Forestry Development in North East India. Omsons Publications Rajouri Garden, New Delhi.
  14. Dijk, A. V. and M. Hussein (1994) Environmental Profile of North West Frontier Province-Pakistan. pp. 31-69, EDC (Pvt.) Limited, Enterprise and Development Consulting, Islamabad. Pakistan.
  15. Forrester, J. W. and P. M. Senge (1980) Tests for Building Confidence in System Dynamics Models. In A. A. Legasto, JR, J. W. Forrester, and J. M. Lyneis (Ed.) System Dynamics: TIMS Studies in the Management Science 14, 209-228. New York: North-Holland.
  16. Hafeez, S M. (2000) Bio-energy for Meeting Growing Energy Needs. In RWEDP [Regional Wood Energy Development Programme], editor. Wood Fuel Production and Marketing in Pakistan. National Workshop, Faisalabad, Pakistan, 28-30 October 1997. RWEDP Report No 49. Bangkok, Thailand: FAO [Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations], pp. 143-149.
  17. IUCN (2004) Abbottabad-State of the Environment and Development. IUCN Pakistan and NWFP: Karachi, Pakistan. XII, pp. 136.
  18. Khalil, S. (2000) The Economic Valuation Methods of Environment: Application to Mangrove Ecosystem (Products) Along Karachi Coastal Line. Pakistan Economic and Social Review 38:1, 16-46.
  19. Knudsen, A. J. (1995) Forest Management in Pakistan: Failed Policies or Local Mismanagement? pp. 1-13, CHR. Michelsen Institute, Development Studies and Human Rights, Fantoft-Bergen, Norway.
  20. Knudsen, A. J. (1996) Deforestation and Entrepreneurship in the North-West Frontier Province, Pakistan. In S. T. Madsen (ed.). State, Society and the Environment in South Asia. Richmond, UK. Curzon Press, pp. 200-235.
  21. Lall, J. S. and A. D. Moddie (1981) The Himalaya: Aspect of Change. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
  22. Lane, D. C. (1998) Can we have Confidence in Generic Structures? The Journal of the Operational Research Society 49:9, 936-947.
  23. Mather, A. S. and C. L. Needle (2000) The Relationships of Population and Forest Trends. The Geographical Journal 166:1, 2-13.
  24. Myers, N. (1986) Environmental Repercussions of Deforestation in the Himalayas. Journal of World Forest Resources Management 2, 63-72.
  25. Ouerghi, A. (1993) Woodfuel Use in Pakistan: Sustainability of Supply and Socio - economic and Environmental Implications. In Wood Energy Development: Planning, Policies and Strategies; Regional Wood Energy Development Programme in Asia. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations. vol. II, pp. 61-84.
  26. Parker, D. C., S. M. Manson, M. A. Janssen, M. J. Hoffmann, and P. Deadman (2003) Multi-Agent Systems for the Simulation of Land-Use and Land-Cover Change: A Review. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93:2, 314-337.
  27. Pati, R. N. (ed.) (1992) Health, Environment and Development. S. B. Nangia, Ashish Publishing House 8/81, Punjabi Bagh, New Delhi 110026.
  28. Payr, G. (1999) Joint Forest Management in State Forests in the Context of the German Supported Siran Kaghan Forest Development Project (SKFDP), Seminar Proceedings "Changing Roles in Development: The Effects of Community involvement on Line Agencies and NGO's". Department of Forestry, Fisheries and Wildlife, NWFP.
  29. PFI (2004) National Forest and Rangeland Assessment Study. Pakistan Forest Institute, Government of Pakistan, Ministry of Environment, pp. 83-88.
  30. Qasim, M., K. Hubacek, M. Termansen, and L. Fleskens (2013) Modelling Land Use Change Across Elevation Gradients in District Swat, Pakistan. Reg. Environ Change 13:567-581, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013 Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York.
  31. Rauf, R. A. (1994) Agro-forestry-Conserving the Environment. Pakistan Academy of Rural Development, Peshawar. Journal of Rural Development and Administration 26:3.
  32. Ravindranath, N. H. and D. O. Hall (1995) Biomass, Energy and Environment: A Developing Country Perspective from India. Oxford University Press.
  33. Sheikh, M. I. and M. Hafeez (1977) Forests and Forestry in Pakistan, pp. 1-4, 14-2240- 42,47-51,64-66,70,72,113,234, Pakistan Forest Institute, Peshawar.
  34. Siddiqui, K. M. (2000) Wood Fuel in the National Energy Balance. In RWEDP [Regional Wood Energy Development Programme], editor. Wood, Fuel Production and Marketing in Pakistan. National Workshop, Faisalabad, Pakistan, 28-30 October 1997. RWEDP Report No 49. Bangkok, Thailand: FAO [Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations], pp. 25-30.
  35. Sterling, C. (1976) Nepal. Atlantic Monthly 23:8(4), 14-25.
  36. Sterman, J. D. (2000) Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Boston (MA): McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
  37. Wannitikul, Ga (2005) Deforestation in Northeast Thailand, 1975-91: Results of a General Statistical Model. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 26:1, 102-118.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nazir, N., Olabisi, L. S., & Ahmad, S.
Venue
The Pakistan Development Review
Published
2018-03-01
Pages
73-98
ISSN
0030-9729 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2906020310
Cited by
14
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Pakistan Development Review (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
Keywords
wood consumption, timber shortage, firewood, timber, forest land, population growth, wood imports, energy demand, forest industry, Pakistan

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review