Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 16Management and Optimization TechniquesDigital Transformation in IndustryManagement Systems and Quality Improvement

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Analysis of the maturity of process monitoring in manufacturing companies

Open access
Czerwińska, Karolina, Pacana, Andrzej·2022·Production Engineering Archives
DOI 10.30657/pea.2022.28.30
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The economic progress of recent years has contributed to the fact that both the quality of products and services offered and ISO standardization have become priority criterion that determines the success of manufacturing enterprises. Therefore, the monitoring and supervision of processes carried out in manufacturing companies is a key issue. These aspects support the achievement of key economic and quality objectives. The paper presents the results of a study on manufacturing enterprises in the context of process monitoring maturity. The research objective of the study was to determine the level of maturity in the use of process monitoring techniques and methods in manufacturing enterprises. The subject of the research were the techniques and methods used by the surveyed enterprises in such areas as: production management, machinery park management, warehouse management, transport management, inventory and supply management and IT tools. In order to determine the level of maturity, the author’s model was used, according to which the level of maturity of a manufacturing enterprise in the area of process monitoring depends on the instrumentation that is used in it.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.30657/pea.2022.28.30

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Borkowski, S., Ingaldi, M., Jagusiak-Kocik, M., 2014. Quality Analysis and Technological Portfolio in Production of the Metal Screws. METAL 2014: 23rd International Conference On Metallurgy And Materials, 1716–1722.
  2. Fertsch, M., (ed.) 2016. Elementy inżynierii logistycznej, Poznan: ILIM, 11-52.
  3. Pacana, A., Bednarova, L., Liberko, I., et al., 2014. Effect of selected production factors of the stretch film on its extensibility. Przemysł Chemiczny. 93(7), 1139-1140.
  4. Pacana, A., et al., 2016. Decision support in the production of packaging films by cost-quality analysis. Przemysł Chemiczny, 93(12), 2263-2264.
  5. Sage, A.P., Rouse, W.B., 2009. Handbook of Systems Engineering and Management. Wiley-Interscience, New Jersey.

Cited by

See all 16

Metadata

Authors
Czerwińska, K., & Pacana, A.
Affiliations
Rzeszów University of Technology (PL)
Corresponding author
Pacana, Andrzej
ORCID
Venue
Production Engineering Archives
Publisher
Stowarzyszenie Menedzerow Jakosci i Produkcji
Published
2022-08-05
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
246-251
ISSN
  • 2353-5156 (ISSN-L)
  • 2353-7779
DOI
10.30657/pea.2022.28.30
OpenAlex
W4290081816
Cited by
16
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Production Engineering Archives (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management and Optimization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management Systems and Quality Improvement
Keywords
process monitoring, maturity levels, manufacturing companies, production management, warehouse management, transport management, software tools, instrumentation, ISO standardization, quality management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.