The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Construcción y organización del espacio incaico al norte del Valle de Hualfín, Catamarca, Argentina
Abstract
This book presents the results of research on the Inca site of Hualfín Inka, located in the northwest of the province of Catamarca, Argentina. The research focused on the methods used for the study of landscape archaeology, through which the chronology of the site, its functionality within the Inca Empire and their relationship to local-regional level was established. Another objective was to explain the way that the Incas used the architecture to dominate local communities. Analysed are architectural characteristics, the functionality of the structures within the site and the use of the surrounding landscape, emphasizing the changes as a way for the interpretation of the Tawantinsuyu problems in the Northwest of Argentina.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hualfín Inka is a smaller administrative and ceremonial site built on a previously unoccupied spot, spatially segregated from the local population across the Hualfín river.
“Even closer to Villavil 2, the site of Hualfín Inka is yet another good example (Lynch 2013;Lynch et al. 2013).As has previously been mentioned, this smaller administrative and ceremonial site was built on a previously unoccupied spot, which was spatially segregated from the local population across the Hualfín river.”
From On the periphery of the inka empire: spatial arrangement at the pre-hispanic rock-art site of villavil 2 (catamarca, argentina) (2024) · cites this paper as Lynch 2013
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Parcero-Oubiña, C., Fábrega-Álvarez, P., & Lynch, J. (2024) · Cambridge Archaeological Journal · doi:10.1017/s0959774323000240 · Cited by 2
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lynch, J.
- Publisher
- University of Michigan Press
- Published
- 2013
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
