The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Early and Later Readers of Isaiah 36–39: The Interpretive Significance of the Textual Divisions in the Hebrew, Greek, and Latin Canonical Traditions
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Metadata
- Authors
- Goswell, G.
- Corresponding author
- Goswell, Gregory
- ORCID
- Goswell, Gregory
- Venue
- The Function of the Reader in the Formation and the Reception of the Book of Isaiah
- Publisher
- Brill | Schöningh
- Published
- 2024-02-15
- Pages
- 167-181
- OpenAlex
- W4392256723
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Brill | Schöningh eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Historical and Linguistic Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
- Keywords
- textual division, canonical tradition, Septuagint, Vulgate, Hebrew Bible, biblical exegesis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
