The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Developmental Model for Determining Whether the Treatment Is Actually Implemented
Abstract
Determining whether or not the treatment or innovation under study is actually in use, and if so, how it is being used, is essential to the interpretation of any study. The concept of Levels of Use of the Innovation (LoU) permits an operational, cost-feasible description and documentation of whether or not an innovation or treatment is being implemented. Data from change research and evaluation studies indicate that there are eight different LoU’s that can be reliably measured. Knowing the LoU of individuals within a research or evaluation sample can avoid holding false assumptions and making misleading interpretations about the user/nonuser and the effects of the treatment or innovation under study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth
Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/s0742-051x(02)00053-7 · Cited by 2,228
Dusenbury, L. (2003) · Health Education Research · doi:10.1093/her/18.2.237 · Cited by 1,671
Staff development and the process of teacher change
GUSKEY, T. R. (1986) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x015005005 · Cited by 1,493
ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION: REVIEW, CRITIQUE AND SUGGESTED RESEARCH DIRECTIONS*
Wolfe, R. A. (1994) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1994.tb00624.x · Cited by 1,432
Professionally Developing as a Teacher Educator
Loughran, J. (2014) · Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1177/0022487114533386 · Cited by 522
Metadata
- Authors
- Hall, G. E., & Loucks, S. F.
- Venue
- American Educational Research Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1977
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 263
- ISSN
- 0002-8312 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017087186
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Developmental Model for Determining Whether the Treatment Is Actually Implemented. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1162291
- The paper
- Hall, G. E., & Loucks, S. F. (1977). A Developmental Model for Determining Whether the Treatment Is Actually Implemented. American Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.2307/1162291
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.