The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Student Engagement in Instructional Activity: Patterns in the Elementary, Middle, and High School Years
Abstract
Although student engagement with the intellectual work of school is important to students' achievement and to their social and cognitive development, studies over a span of two decades have documented low levels of engagement, particularly in the classroom, Examining several theoretical perspectives that attempt to explain engagement through comprehensive frameworks, this study evaluates the effect on engagement of school reform initiatives that are consistent with the theories. The study also investigates whether patterns exist in students' engagement, whether the patterns are consistent across grade levels, and whether class subject matter (mathematics or social studies) differentially affects engagement. The sample includes 3, 669 students representing 143 social studies and mathematics classrooms in a nationally selected sample of 24 restructuring elementary, middle, and high schools. Because of the nature of the nested data (students nested within classrooms nested within schools), the analysis is conducted using hierarchical linear modeling in its three-level application (HLM3L). The reform initiatives, which are consistent with the theories, eliminate personal background effects. Together with classroom subject matter, they substantially influence engagement. The results are generally consistent across grade levels.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/9780674028845 · Cited by 26,084
Motivational processes affecting learning.
Dweck, C. S. (1986) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.41.10.1040 · Cited by 6,971
Finn, J. D. (1989) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.2307/1170412 · Cited by 2,702
Instructional Discourse, Student Engagement, and Literature Achievement
Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (1991) · Research in the Teaching of English · doi:10.58680/rte199115462 · Cited by 551
Cited by
School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543074001059 · Cited by 12,581
Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2011) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654311421793 · Cited by 2,370
Relationships matter: linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement.
Klem, A. M., & Connell, J. P. (2004) · Journal of School Health · doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2004.tb08283.x · Cited by 2,082
Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.20303 · Cited by 1,956
Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002 · Cited by 1,858
Metadata
- Authors
- Marks, H. M.
- Venue
- American Educational Research Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publishing
- Published
- 2000-01-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 153-153
- ISSN
- 0002-8312 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2109944718
- Cited by
- 1,554
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 46.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Student Engagement in Instructional Activity: Patterns in the Elementary, Middle, and High School Years. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1163475
- The paper
- Marks, H. M. (2000). Student Engagement in Instructional Activity: Patterns in the Elementary, Middle, and High School Years. American Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.2307/1163475
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.