Instructional Discourse, Student Engagement, and Literature Achievement
Abstract
This article examines the kinds of instruction that foster student engagement with literature and the effects of such instruction on achievement. First, two general kinds of student engagement are distinguished: “procedural,” which concerns classroom rules and regulations, and “substantive,” which involves sustained commitment to the content and issues of academic study. The article then describes the manifestations of these two forms of engagement, explains how they relate differently to student outcomes, and offers some empirical propositions using data on literature instruction from 58 eighth-grade English classes. The results provide support for three hypotheses: (a) Disengagement adversely affects achievement; (b) Procedural engagement has an attenuated relationship to achievement because its observable indicators conflate procedural and substantive engagement; and (c) Substantive engagement has a strong, positive effect on achievement. Features of substantively engaging instruction include authentic questions, or questions which have no prespecified answers; uptake, or the incorporation of previous answers into subsequent questions; and high-level teacher evaluation, or teacher certification and incorporation of student responses into subsequent discussion. Each of these is noteworthy because they all involve reciprocal interaction and negotiation between students and teachers, which is said to be the hallmark of substantive engagement.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974) · Language · doi:10.2307/412243 · Cited by 11,350 · see citing works
Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning
Cazden, C. B. (1988) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,068 · see citing works
Goodlad, J. I. (1984) · Cited by 1,809 · see citing works
Clark, W. H., & Rosenblatt, L. M. (1970) · Journal of Aesthetic Education · doi:10.2307/3331557 · Cited by 1,580 · see citing works
Learning How to Mean: Explorations in the Development of Language
Halliday, M. A. K. (1975) · Cited by 1,359 · see citing works
Bruner, J. S. (2025) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/15707.003.0011 · Cited by 591 · see citing works
Language, the Learner and the School
Scott, J. L., Barnes, D., Britton, J., Rosen, H., & E., L. A. T. (1973) · The English Journal · doi:10.2307/813888 · Cited by 499 · see citing works
The development of writing abilities
Britton, J. (1975) · Cited by 482 · see citing works
Socioeconomic indexes and the new 1980 census occupational classification scheme
Stevens, G., & Cho, J. H. (1985) · Social Science Research · doi:10.1016/0049-089x(85)90008-0 · Cited by 431 · see citing works
The Child's Concept Of Story: Ages Two To Seventeen
Applebee, A. N. (1978) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 394 · see citing works
The social construction of literacy
Cook‐Gumperz, J. (2006) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511617454.002 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Instructional Scaffolding: Reading and Writing as Natural Language Activities
Applebee, A. N., & Langer, J. A. (1983) · Language Arts · doi:10.58680/la198326236 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Writing and Response: Theory, Practice, and Research
Gere, A. R., & Anson, C. M. (1990) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.2307/358169 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Contexts for Learning to Write: Studies of Secondary School Instruction
Pradl, G. M., & Applebee, A. N. (1986) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.2307/358067 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Understanding a Writer's Awareness of Audience
Berkenkotter, C. A. (1981) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.2307/356601 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Reading and Writing Instruction: Toward a Theory of Teaching and Learning
Langer, J. A., & Applebee, A. N. (1986) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.2307/1167222 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Student Engagement: When Recitation Becomes Conversation.
Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (1990) · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Self-citationDiscourse Style, Classroom Interaction and Differential Treatment
Collins, J. (1982) · Journal of Reading Behavior · doi:10.1080/10862968209547468 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Dialogue Journal Communication: Classroom, Linguistic, Social, and Cognitive Views
Staton, J. (1988) · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Writing: Trends Across the Decade, 1974-84.
Applebee, A. N. (1986) · Cited by 33 · see citing works
A Study of Instruction as Discourse.
Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (1988) · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Self-citationNewmann, F. M. (1988) · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543074001059 · Cited by 12,581 · see citing works
Framing student engagement in higher education
Kahu, E. R. (2013) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.598505 · Cited by 2,103 · see citing works
Promoting Argument-Counterargument Integration in Students' Writing
Nussbaum, E. M., & Schraw, G. (2007) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.3200/jexe.76.1.59-92 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- ORCID
- Gamoran, Adam
- Venue
- Research in the Teaching of English
- Published
- 1991-10-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 261-290
- ISSN
- 0034-527X (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2348
- OpenAlex
- W113391426
- Semantic Scholar
- cf954680d13397b9c225cc0d25d05478207d3757
- Cited by
- 551
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 7.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Research in the Teaching of English (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Philosophies and Pedagogies
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
- Keywords
- didactic discourse, student engagement, literature teaching, eighth-grade English, authentic questions, uptake, teacher evaluation, student-teacher interaction, classroom rules
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
