Cited by 442Education, Achievement, and GiftednessSchool Choice and PerformanceCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills

The Development of Gender Achievement Gaps in Mathematics and Reading During Elementary and Middle School: Examining Direct Cognitive Assessments and Teacher Ratings

Robinson, Joseph Paul, Lubienski, Sarah Theule·2011·American Educational Research Journal

Abstract

Using K–8 national longitudinal data, the authors investigate males’ and females’ achievement in math and reading, including when gender gaps first appear, whether the appearance of gaps depends on the metric used, and where on the achievement distribution gaps are most prevalent. Additionally, teachers’ assessments of males and females are compared. The authors find no math gender gap in kindergarten, except at the top of the distribution; however, females throughout the distribution lose ground in elementary school and regain some in middle school. In reading, gaps favoring females generally narrow but widen among low-achieving students. However, teachers consistently rate females higher than males in both subjects, even when cognitive assessments suggest that males have an advantage. Implications for policy and further research are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3102/0002831210372249

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The gender gap favoring females on assessments of literacy is often present from the moment children enter formal schooling and persists across the life course.

    “In comparison to the shrinking mathematics achievement gap, the gender gap favoring females on assessments of literacy are often present from the moment children enter formal schooling and persist across the life course (e.g., Perie et al., 2005; Rathbun and West, 2004; Robinson and Lubienski, 2011).”

    From Gender and Education (2015) · cites this paper as Robinson and Lubienski, 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Robinson, J. P., & Lubienski, S. T.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Venue
American Educational Research Journal
Published
2011-04
Volume
48
Issue
2
Pages
268-302
ISSN
  • 0002-8312 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-1011
OpenAlex
W1972041347
Cited by
442
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 81 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 17
FWCI
18.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Educational Research Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
Keywords
gender differences in achievement, mathematics achievement, reading achievement, elementary school, junior high school, teacher ratings, student self-assessment, achievement distribution, low-achieving students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review