The Development of Gender Achievement Gaps in Mathematics and Reading During Elementary and Middle School: Examining Direct Cognitive Assessments and Teacher Ratings
Abstract
Using K–8 national longitudinal data, the authors investigate males’ and females’ achievement in math and reading, including when gender gaps first appear, whether the appearance of gaps depends on the metric used, and where on the achievement distribution gaps are most prevalent. Additionally, teachers’ assessments of males and females are compared. The authors find no math gender gap in kindergarten, except at the top of the distribution; however, females throughout the distribution lose ground in elementary school and regain some in middle school. In reading, gaps favoring females generally narrow but widen among low-achieving students. However, teachers consistently rate females higher than males in both subjects, even when cognitive assessments suggest that males have an advantage. Implications for policy and further research are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The gender gap favoring females on assessments of literacy is often present from the moment children enter formal schooling and persists across the life course.
“In comparison to the shrinking mathematics achievement gap, the gender gap favoring females on assessments of literacy are often present from the moment children enter formal schooling and persist across the life course (e.g., Perie et al., 2005; Rathbun and West, 2004; Robinson and Lubienski, 2011).”
From Gender and Education (2015) · cites this paper as Robinson and Lubienski, 2011
Cites
Ready, D. D., LoGerfo, L. F., Burkam, D. T., & Lee, V. E. (2005) · The Elementary School Journal · doi:10.1086/496905 · Cited by 245 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Using the IRT-based scale scores, LoGerfo, Nichols, and Reardon (2006) found that males and females both learn considerable amounts (about 80 points in the scale score metric) from kindergarten through third grade in reading, but females learn even more (about 3 points more).”
Method
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Does stereotype threat influence performance of girls in stereotyped domains? A meta-analysis
Flore, P. C., & Wicherts, J. M. (2015) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2014.10.002 · Cited by 410 · see citing works
Cornell, D., Shukla, K., & Konold, T. R. (2016) · AERA Open · doi:10.1177/2332858416633184 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Men, women and STEM: Why the differences and what should be done?
Stewart-Williams, S., & Halsey, L. G. (2021) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1177/0890207020962326 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Pahlke, E., & Goble, P. (2015) · International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.92151-2 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Robinson, J. P., & Lubienski, S. T.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Venue
- American Educational Research Journal
- Published
- 2011-04
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 268-302
- ISSN
- 0002-8312 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-1011
- OpenAlex
- W1972041347
- Cited by
- 442
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 81 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 18.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Educational Research Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
- Keywords
- gender differences in achievement, mathematics achievement, reading achievement, elementary school, junior high school, teacher ratings, student self-assessment, achievement distribution, low-achieving students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review