Cited by 245Early Childhood Education and DevelopmentReading and Literacy DevelopmentEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

Explaining girls' advantage in kindergarten literacy learning: do classroom behaviors make a difference?

Ready, Douglas D., LoGerfo, Laura F., Burkam, David T., Lee, Valerie E.·2005·The Elementary School Journal

Abstract

This study investigated gender differences in kindergarteners’ literacy skills, specifically, whether differences in children’s classroom behaviors explained females’ early learning advantage. Data included information on 16,883 kindergartners (8,701 boys and 8,182 girls) from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten Cohort of 1998–1999 (ECLS‐K). The ECLS‐K directly assessed children’s cognitive skills and collected extensive data on children’s sociodemographic and behavioral backgrounds through structured telephone interviews with parents and written surveys with children’s teachers. Findings suggested that not only did girls enter kindergarten with somewhat stronger literacy skills but they also learned slightly more than boys over the kindergarten year. Taking into account teachers’ reports of girls’ more positive learning approaches (e.g., attentiveness, task persistence) explained almost two‐thirds of the female advantage in literacy learning. Accounting for boys’ more prevalent external behavior problems, thought by many to explain girls’ advantage in literacy development, did little to diminish the gender gap.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/496905

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a nationally representative sample of US kindergartners, girls enter kindergarten with greater literacy skills than boys and learn slightly more across the kindergarten year.

    “For example, research examining literacy skills in a nationally representative sample of kindergartners in the US has shown that girls not only enter kindergarten with greater literacy skills than boys, but they also learn slightly more across the kindergarten year (Ready et al., 2005).”

    From Gender and Education (2015) · cites this paper as Ready et al., 2005

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ready, D. D., LoGerfo, L. F., Burkam, D. T., & Lee, V. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Oregon (US)
  • Urban Institute (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Venue
The Elementary School Journal
Published
2005-09
Volume
106
Issue
1
Pages
21-38
ISSN
  • 0013-5984 (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-8279
OpenAlex
W2114827857
Cited by
245
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 9
FWCI
22.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Elementary School Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
gender differences, early literacy, kindergarten, classroom behavior, learning methods, attentiveness, task persistence, externalizing problems, early childhood education, ECLS-K, literacy achievement gap

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review