The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 2 of the 50 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning
Open accessAbstract
Many teaching practices implicitly assume that conceptual knowledge can be abstracted from the situations in which it is learned and used. This article argues that this assumption inevitably limits the effectiveness of such practices. Drawing on recent research into cognition as it is manifest in everyday activity, the authors argue that knowledge is situated, being in part a product of the activity, context, and culture in which it is developed and used. They discuss how this view of knowledge affects our understanding of learning, and they note that conventional schooling too often ignores the influence of school culture on what is learned in school. As an alternative to conventional practices, they propose cognitive apprenticeship (Collins, Brown, & Newman, in press), which honors the situated nature of knowledge. They examine two examples of mathematics instruction that exhibit certain key features of this approach to teaching.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The paper argues that knowledge is fundamentally situated—partly a product of activity, context, and culture—so teaching methods that treat concepts as abstract, self-contained, and transferable are often misleading and ineffective. As an alternative, it proposes “cognitive apprenticeship,” illustrated through two mathematics teaching examples.
Key findings
- Knowledge is not independent of situations; it is a co-production of mind and world, and abstraction/explication provides an “inherently impoverished and often misleading” view of knowledge.
- Vocabulary taught from dictionary definitions is slow and unsuccessful: the average 17-year-old learns vocabulary at 5,000 words per year (13 per day) over 16 years through listening, talking, and reading, whereas classroom definition-based teaching can cover only 100 to 200 words per year and produces errors such as “I was meticulous about falling off the cliff.”
- Learning is a process of enculturation into authentic activity and culture; school activity is often “ersatz” and self-confirming, so success in school may have little bearing on performance elsewhere.
- Cognitive apprenticeship—using modeling, coaching, fading, social interaction, and collaboration—can enculturate students into authentic practices; the paper examines Schoenfeld’s magic-square problem-solving class and Lampert’s fourth-grade multiplication teaching through coin problems and student-generated stories.
Methods
- Conceptual and theoretical paper, not an empirical study; it synthesizes research on everyday cognition, apprenticeship, situated learning, indexicality, and enculturation.
- Uses illustrative cases and examples, including Miller and Gildea’s vocabulary teaching, Lave’s Weight Watchers cottage-cheese problem, Schoenfeld’s mathematics teaching, and Lampert’s multiplication teaching.
- Main analysis is argumentative: it contrasts JPF, student, and practitioner activity (Table 1) and proposes cognitive apprenticeship as an alternative to conventional didactic schooling.
Limitations
- Stated: the authors describe the exploration as “consciously speculative” and “admittedly tentative”; they say the paper does not attempt a historical survey or critical analysis, and that “major theoretical work” on situated cognition remains to be done.
- Stated: future work must frame the relationship between explicit knowledge and implicit understanding.
- Evident: the paper presents no controlled outcome data or systematic evaluation; its claims about transfer, school culture, and cognitive apprenticeship rest on conceptual argument and illustrative examples.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
118 Own interpretation · 41 Sources not found · 4 No full text of the sources · 2 No basis given · 1 Partly supported · accuracy not yet measured
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“We know from an extensive literature on the subject (diSessa, 1982, 1983, 1986; McCloskey, Caramazza, & Green, 1980; White, 1983) that students have many misconceptions about qualitative phenomena in physics.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites diSessa, 1982, 1983, 1986
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Supportedcites McCloskey, Caramazza, & Green, 1980 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
McCloskey, Caramazza, and Green (1980) is cited as one work in a broader literature supporting the sentence, not as evidence for every misconception in physics. A Semantic Scholar snippet from “Overcoming University Students’ Alternative Conceptions in Newtonian Mechanics” (score 0.493) explicitly attributes undergraduate students’ mistaken predictions about curvilinear motion to McCloskey et al. (1980). The cited paper therefore supports the claim through a concrete example, although paper-scoped searches returned no full-text snippets. (LLM, conf=0.79)
- Could not verifycites White, 1983 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The supplied source, D. W. R. White’s 1983 paper “Plant Regeneration from Mesophyll Protoplasts of White Clover,” concerns plant regeneration, not physics education. Two searches within that paper returned no snippets, but the absence of accessible text prevents a definitive finding about its contents. An unscoped search found only lower-scoring discussions of physics misconceptions in other papers, not a sufficiently strong match to identify the intended White (1983) source. The citation appears mismatched, but the evidence does not meet the threshold for a misattribution verdict. (LLM, conf=0.75)
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The occasions and conditions for use arise directly out of the context of activities of each community or culture that uses the tool, framed by the way members of that culture see the world.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Miller and Gildea's (1987) work on vocabulary teaching shows how the assumption that knowing and doing can be separated leads to a teaching method that ignores the way situations structure cognition.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Miller and Gildea (1987) source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Miller and Gildea note that by listening, talking, and reading the average 17-year-old has learned vocabulary at a rate of 5,000 words per year (13 per day) for over 16 years.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Miller and Gildea
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Language use would involve an unremitting confrontation with ambiguity, polysemy, nuance, metaphor, etc., were it not for the extralinguistic help that the context of an utterance provides (Nunberg, 1978).”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Nunberg, 1978
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Similarly, it is common for students to acquire algorithms, routines, and decontextualized definitions that they cannot use and that therefore lie inert.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To develop this comparison between tools and knowledge, between manual tools and conceptual tools, a little further, it can be noted that learning how to use a tool involves far more than can be accounted for in any set of explicit rules.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“They are bound by intricate, socially constructed webs of belief, which make it possible to see them as cultures (Geertz, 1983), and which are essential to interpreting what they do.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Geertz, 1983
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because new situations, negotiations, and activities inevitably recast them in a new, more densely textured form, concepts continually evolve with each new occasion of use.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The authors examine one such method and argue that its lack of success is a direct result of this assumption.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 54
- It may state two separate claims as one. 36
In the paper
“There is barely enough classroom time, Miller and Gildea suggest, to teach more than 100 to 200 words per year.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Miller and Gildea
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Many teaching methods implicitly assume that conceptual knowledge is independent of the situations in which it is learned and used.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“By contrast, learning words from definitions and sentences abstracted from the context of normal communication, the way vocabulary has often been taught, is slow and unsuccessful.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Miller and Gildea
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Knowledge, we claim, is partially embedded in the social and physical world.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is impossible to capture the densely interwoven nature of conceptual knowledge completely in explicit, abstract accounts.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Learning is the process of constructing robust understanding out of this sort of embedded activity.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Teaching methods, however, often try to impart abstracted conceptual tools as fixed, well-defined, independent entities that can be explored in prototypical examples and textbook exercises.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“And these embedding circumstances allow people to share the burden of solving problems efficiently.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Knowledge is fundamentally a co-production of the mind and the world, which like woof and warp need each other to produce texture and to complete an otherwise incoherent pattern.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Teaching, however, often overlooks the central, but restrictive, contribution made by the activities, context, and culture of schools to what is learned there.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“And the general strategies for intuitive reasoning, resolving issues, and negotiating meaning that people develop through everyday activity are superseded by the precise, well-defined problems, formal definitions, and symbol manipulation that characterize much school activity.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such ploys indicate how thoroughly learners really are situated, and how they always lean on the embedding context for help.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“So even though students are expected to behave differently, they inevitably do behave like the JPFs they are and solve most of their problems in their own situated way.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To learn to use tools as practitioners use them, students, like apprentices, must be enabled to enter that community and its culture.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Unfortunately, students are too often presented with only a part of this complex.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The issues and problems that they face arise out of, are defined by, and are resolved within the constraints of their belief system and the activity they are pursuing.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Though these are often anathema to traditional schooling, they are an essential component of social interaction and thus of learning.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Within a culture, ideas are exchanged and modified and belief systems developed and appropriated in part through conversation and narratives”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Learning is instead a continual process needing above all authentic activity to support its development.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“From here, students can, as we have suggested, use their fledgling conceptual knowledge to see their activity in a new light, which in turn leads to the further development of the conceptual knowledge, and so on.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When descriptions replace indexical terms (which is analogous, we hold, to classroom descriptions of activity replacing activity), the nature of discourse changes and understanding becomes much more problematic.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The social network within the culture helps them develop its language and the belief systems and promotes the process of enculturation.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“They need to observe how qualified practitioners behave and talk to get a sense of how expertise is manifest in conversation and other activities.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Collaboration also leads to the articulation or manifestation of strategies, which can then be discussed and reflected on.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If, as we propose, learning is a process of enculturating that is supported in part through social interaction and the circulation of narrative”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As the students gain more self-confidence and control, they move into a more autonomous phase of collaborative learning, where they begin to participate consciously in the culture.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The group, however, permits different roles to be displayed and engenders reflective narratives and discussions about the aptness of those roles.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this sequence, apprenticeship and coaching begin by providing modeling in situ and scaffolding for students to get started in an authentic activity.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The belief system is instilled in the only way it can be, through practice in which the students actively take part.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In language learning, for example, the original frail understanding of a word is developed and extended through subsequent use and social negotiation, though each use is no less situated.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Successful execution of most individual tasks requires students to understand the many different roles needed for carrying out that task.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This further suggests that a new epistemology might hold the key to a dramatic improvement in learning and completely new insights into education.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In educational terms alone, however, the unheralded importance of activity and enculturation to learning suggests that much common practice is the product of an inadequate epistemology.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All knowledge is, we believe, like language. Its constituent parts index the world and so are inextricably a product of the activity and situations in which they are produced and used.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus all concepts--even apparently well-defined, abstract technical concepts--are always under construction. They are never wholly definable, and they defy the sort of categorical descriptions that are conventionally used in teaching: part of their meaning is always inherited from the contexts in which they are used.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The adequacy of the solution they reach becomes apparent in relation to the role it must play in allowing activity to continue.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Conceptual tools similarly reflect the cumulative wisdom of the culture in which they are used and the insights and experience of individuals. Their meaning is not invariant but a product of negotiation within a culture and of practice in authentic activity.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“They are not merely context sensitive; they are completely context dependent. They can only be understood in relation to specific situations, from which indexicals are, for the purposes of interpretation, inseparable.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“But words and sentences are not islands, entire unto themselves. They rely on the context in which they are used--and not just the linguistic context--to be understood.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Nunberg, 1978
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“He filled a measuring cup two-thirds full of cottage cheese, dumped it out on the cutting board, patted it into a circle, marked a cross on it, scooped away one quadrant, and served the rest.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Lave (1988b)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Instead, it may be more useful to consider conceptual knowledge as in some ways similar to a set of tools.”
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Learning and acting are, as a result, interestingly indistinct, learning being a continuous, life-long process resulting from acting in situations.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Tools share several significant features with knowledge; in particular, both can be fully understood in use, and both, if fully understood, change the way their users look at the world.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Activity, concept, and culture are interdependent. No one can be totally understood without the other two. Learning must therefore involve all three.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“His class' goal, by contrast, is to understand the mathematical nature of magic squares, and it is in part by doing this that the belief system is exemplified.”
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“So knowledge, which comes coded by and connected to the activity and environment in which it is developed, is spread across its component parts--some of which are in the mind and some in the world--as the final picture on a jigsaw is spread across its component pieces.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Conversely, though schooling seeks to encourage problem solving, it disregards most of the inventive heuristics that students bring to the classroom.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“by pointing to different decompositions, it stresses that heuristics are not absolute, but assessed with respect to a particular task--and that even algorithms can be assessed in this way.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“by allowing students to generate their own solution paths, it helps make them conscious, creative members of the culture of problem-solving mathematicians.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Lampert (1986) also involves her students in mathematical exploration, which she tries to make continuous with their everyday knowledge.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Lampert (1986) source
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“And, in enculturating through this activity, they acquire some of the culture's tools--a shared vocabulary and the means to discuss, reflect upon, evaluate, and validate community procedures in a collaborative process.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The students start with an extended procedure that parallels the story problem above. Eventually they find ways to shorten the process, and they usually arrive at the standard algorithm, justifying their findings with the stories they had created earlier.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Lampert
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the ensuing situations, the appropriateness of the word is tested and, as with all conceptual knowledge, each application has the potential to change an individual's understanding of both the word and the world --the two are interdependent.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“She tries to inculcate an inseparable understanding of all of these kinds of knowledge and the connections between them, and thus to bridge the huge gap that emerges from much conventional teaching between conceptual knowledge and problem-solving activity--between, as we characterized them at the beginning, knowing and doing.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Lampert
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Thus, Lampert presents the algorithm as one more useful strategy to help them resolve community problems.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Lampert
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“by beginning with a task embedded in a familiar activity, it shows the students the legitimacy of their implicit knowledge and its availability as scaffolding in apparently unfamiliar tasks.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Indexical terms are virtually transparent. They, like a signpost, draw little or no attention to themselves.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Eagleton (1983) describes reading as just such an enriching process, through which people continually change how they read and this, in turn, changes what they are reading.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Eagleton (1983)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“By deliberately engaging students in authentic mathematical practice, he reaches well beyond the inculcation of problem-solving skills. His method, much more importantly, provides students with the opportunity to enter the culture of mathematical practice, which enables them to use those skills as practitioners.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Schoenfeld
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“The class worked collectively through a number of strategies, in which, on reflection, they recognized more general and more powerful mathematical ideas.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Schoenfeld
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“prevalent school practices still broadly assume that knowledge is individual and self-structured, that schools are neutral with respect to what is learned in them, that concepts are abstract and immutable and independent of the activity in which they are acquired and used, and that JPF behavior is something to be discouraged.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Schoenfeld is careful to emphasize that all these strategies are illustrated in action, developed by the class, not declared by the teacher.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Schoenfeld
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Lave (1988c) describes how some students feel it necessary to disguise effective strategies so that teachers believe the problems have been solved in the school-approved way.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Lave (1988c)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the terms of cognitive apprenticeship, we can represent the progress of the students from embedded activity to general principles of the culture as presented in Figure 3.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The class went on to explore other possible magic squares and thereby discovered general principles (e.g., an algebraic form for describing them).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Schoenfeld
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As an indication that he is working in the culture of mathematics, not in the culture of schooling, he does not stop at what, in culture of school practice, marks the end: an answer.”
hedgedcorrelationalSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Schoenfeld's teaching of problem solving (1985, in press) attempts to show college students how to think mathematically about the world, how to see the world through mathematicians' eyes, and thus how to use the mathematician's tools.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Schoenfeld (1985, in press) source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Recurring features of the environment seem to afford recurrent sequences of actions.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This sort of dialectical process is common to all activity, and it similarly undermines any assumption that once conceptual knowledge has been described and applied in exercises, the task of teaching or learning has been finished.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Schoenfeld's approach, on the other hand, points in particular to the way in which students can be exposed to the authentic ways of thinking of a culture and its conceptual viewpoint, as much as to its subject matter.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A proposition, as we pointed out above, can only be correctly interpreted in the context of the situation in which it is used.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“And apprenticeship also suggests the paradigm of situated modeling, coaching, and fading (Collins, Brown, & Newman, 1989), whereby teachers or coaches promote learning first by modeling their strategies for students in authentic activity. Then teachers and colleagues support a student's attempts at doing the task. And finally they empower the student to coatinue independent of the teacher.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Collins, Brown, & Newman, 1989
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“An epistemology that begins with activity and perception, which are first and foremost embedded in the world, may simply bypass the classical problem of reference--of mediating conceptual representations.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is at this stage, in short, that students no longer behave as archetypal students but participate in the activity of practitioners and develop their conceptual understanding through social interaction and collaboration in the culture of the domain, not of the school.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Lave (1988a) and Lave and Wenger (in preparation) point out the importance for apprentices of learning their craft in the appropriate community of practice, towards the center of which they continuously progress through gradual enculturation.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Lave (1988a)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Lave and Wenger (in preparation)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This in turn fosters generalizing, grounded in the students' situated understanding.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These then occupy a place in our ontology and become something more to learn about rather than simply something useful in learning.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“groups of practitioners are particularly important, for it is only within groups that social interaction and conversation can take place.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast, indexical representations seem to gain their efficiency by leaving a great deal of the context underrepresented or implicit.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper relies on this without support.
Most school activity exists in a culture of its own.
“The idea that most school activity exists in a culture of its own helps explain many of the difficulties of cultivating robust domain learning in school.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Schools demand a qualitative change in behavior.
“Schools do seem to demand a qualitative change in behavior, however.”
The paper relies on this without support.
What a student is expected to do and what a JPF does are significantly different.
“What the student is expected to do and what a JPF does are significantly different.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The school situation is extremely specialized.
“But the school situation is extremely specialized.”
The paper relies on this without support.
An unacknowledged dependency on school-based cues makes learning extremely fragile when viewed from outside school.
“Viewed from outside, where problems do not come in text books, an unacknowledged dependency on such school-based cues makes the learning extremely fragile.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Many professions with generally acknowledged cognitive content (e.g., law, medicine, architecture, business) have traditionally been learned through apprenticeship.
“Certainly many professions with generally acknowledged cognitive content--for example, law, medicine, architecture, business, etc.--have nonetheless traditionally been learned through apprenticeship.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Advanced graduate students in humanities, social sciences, and physical sciences acquire extremely refined research skills through apprenticeship with senior researchers.
“Moreover, advanced graduate students in the humanities, the social sciences, and the physical sciences, acquire their extremely refined research skills through the apprenticeship they serve with senior researchers.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Advanced graduate students, like all apprentices, must recognize and resolve ill-defined problems that issue out of authentic activity, in contrast to well-defined exercises typically given in textbooks and exams throughout earlier schooling.
“Then they, like all apprentices, must recognize and resolve the ill-defined problems that issue out of authentic activity, in contrast to the welldefined exercises that are typically given to them in text books and on exams throughout their earlier schooling.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Students who are taught individually rather than collaboratively can fail to develop skills needed for collaborative work.
“Students who are taught individually rather than collaboratively can fail to develop skills needed for collaborative work.”
The paper relies on this without support.
For centuries epistemologists have concentrated primarily on conceptual representation and its problematic relation to objects in the world, assuming that representation is cognitively prior to all else.
“For centuries epistemologists have concentrated primarily on conceptual representation and its problematic relation to objects in the world, assuming that representation is cognitively prior to all else.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Teachers rarely have the opportunity to hear enough of what students think to recognize when the information offered back by students is only a surface retelling for school purposes that may mask deep misconceptions about the physical world and problem-solving strategies.
“Teachers rarely have the opportunity to hear enough of what students think to recognize when the information that is offered back by students is only a surface retelling for school purposes (the handing back of an uncomprehended tool, as we described it at the beginning) that may mask deep misconceptions about the physical world and problem-solving strategies.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A common strategy in trying to overcome difficult pedagogic problems is to make as much as possible explicit.
“A common strategy in trying to overcome difficult pedagogic problems is to make as much as possible explicit.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Constructivist, situated, and sociocultural perspectives define learning as active meaning-making, participation in communities of practice, and identity development [24,25,56].”
From A Systematic Review of Generative AI in K–12: Mapping Goals, Activities, Roles, and Outcomes via the 3P Model (2025) · cites this paper as [56]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“These presentations led to discussions helping teachers create authentic contexts for learning STEM content and practices (Brown et al., 1989; Bruner, 1996; Lave & Wenger, 1991).”
From Increasing high school teachers self-efficacy for integrated STEM instruction through a collaborative community of practice (2020) · cites this paper as Brown et al., 1989
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation.
Bloch, M. E. F., Lave, J., & Wenger, É. (1994) · Man · doi:10.2307/2804509 · Cited by 39,362
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983) · Cited by 5,190
Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities
Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1 · Cited by 5,186
Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life
Lave, J. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609268 · Cited by 5,148
Sæverot, H. (2021) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003193463-8 · Cited by 3,090
Martino, P. D., & Signorini, G. (2019) · ICME-13 monographs · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-10472-6 · Cited by 2,698
Barwise, J., & Perry, J. R. (1981) · The Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.2307/2026578 · Cited by 2,361
Suchman, L. A. (1987) · Cited by 2,279
Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension
(2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315107493 · Cited by 2,245
The Problem of the Essential Indexical
Perry, J. (1979) · Noûs · doi:10.2307/2214792 · Cited by 2,195
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Geertz C, 1983, Local knowledge
- Hutchins E, Situated Learning
- Lave I, 1977, The Quarterly Newsletter of the institute for Comparative Human Development, 1, 1
- Lave J, 1988, Paper presented at AERA annual conference
- Pea RD, 1988, Paper presented at the meeting of the Cognitive Science Society
- Resnick L, 1988, Educational Researcher, 16, 13
- Rogoff B, 1984, Everyday cognition: Its development in social context
- Scribner S, 1984, Everyday cognition: Its development in social context, 9
- Shanker A, 1988, New York Times, 7
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 13,065
Bilingual Classroom Studies and Community Analysis: Some Recent Trends
Moll, L. C. (1992) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x021002020 · Cited by 439
Learning in Science — From Behaviourism Towards Social Constructivism and Beyond
Duit, R. H., & Treagust, D. F. (1998) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-4940-2_1 · Cited by 432
Augmented Reality Simulations on Handheld Computers
Squire, K. D., & Klopfer, E. D. (2007) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1080/10508400701413435 · Cited by 440
Number Sense as Situated Knowing in a Conceptual Domain
Greeno, J. G. (1991) · Journal for Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.5951/jresematheduc.22.3.0170 · Cited by 540
Problem-based learning and self-efficacy: How a capstone course prepares students for a profession
Dunlap, J. C. (2005) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02504858 · Cited by 420
“According to Brown, Collins, and Duguid (1989, p. 34) , “the activities of a domain are framed by its culture.” However, conventional schooling tends to expose students only to the culture of the classroom, not to the culture in”
BackgroundThe clinical learning environment in nursing education: a concept analysis
Flott, E. A., & Linden, L. (2015) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.12861 · Cited by 422
Constructivist values for instructional systems design: Five principles toward a new mindset
Lebow, D. G. (1993) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02297354 · Cited by 432
“What these approaches share is the idea that meaning is indexed by experience and that "understanding is developed through continued and situated use" ( Brown et al., 1989, p. 33 ), and, thus, the learning situation should promote application and manipulation of knowledge within the context of the ordinary practices o…”
BackgroundCollaboration and self-regulation in teachers’ professional development
Butler, D. L., Lauscher, H. N., Jarvis-Selinger, S., & Beckingham, B. (2004) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2004.04.003 · Cited by 418
“Although more research is needed to document teachers’ on-line learning processes, in contrast to self-reported learning outcomes, this research underlines the value of coordinating constructivist, sociocultural, and situated theoretical perspectives to provide a richer account of learning (Barab & Duffy, 2000; Brown…”
ResultProblem‐based Learning: Influence on Students' Learning in an Electrical Engineering Course
Yadav, A. K., Subedi, D., Lundeberg, M. A., & Bunting, C. F. (2011) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00013.x · Cited by 427
“Brown, Collins, and Duguid (1989) further emphasized that unless knowledge is developed in the context in which it is to be used, students will gain an understanding of abstract concepts, algorithms, and procedures; thus, the knowledge remains inert and students are unable to use it.”
BackgroundAssessment and the promotion of academic values
Boud, D. J. (1990) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079012331377621 · Cited by 412
Rich environments for active learning: a definition
Grabinger, R. S., & Dunlap, J. C. (2011) · Research in Learning Technology · doi:10.3402/rlt.v3i2.9606 · Cited by 423
Toward an Epistemology of Practice
Raelin, J. A. (2007) · Academy of Management Learning and Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2007.27694950 · Cited by 423
Assessment in the age of artificial intelligence
Swiecki, Z., Khosravi, H., Chen, G., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Lodge, J. M., Milligan, S., Selwyn, N., & Gašević, D. (2022) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100075 · Cited by 409
WALLACE, R. M. (2003) · Education, Communication & Information · doi:10.1080/14636310303143 · Cited by 405
Socio-economic futures in climate change impact assessment: using scenarios as ‘learning machines’
Berkhout, F., Hertin, J., & Jordan, A. (2002) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/s0959-3780(02)00006-7 · Cited by 408
Kozma, R., Chin, E., Russell, J. W., & Marx, N. (2000) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0902_1 · Cited by 416
“There are two important, interrelated aspects of this situated, mediational process: the material and the social ( Brown, Collins, & Duguid, 1989; Greeno, 1998; Wertsch, 1985, 1991).”
BackgroundMotivating Self-Regulated Problem Solvers
Zimmerman, B. J., & Campillo, M. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511615771.009 · Cited by 445
King, A. (1994) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312031002338 · Cited by 406
Modeling units of study from a pedagogical perspective: the pedagogical meta-model behind EML
Koper, R. (2001) · DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) · Cited by 407
Personal Epistemology and Mathematics: A Critical Review and Synthesis of Research
Muis, K. R. (2004) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543074003317 · Cited by 436
“Over the past two decades, two predominant perspectives on approaches to knowing have influenced research in mathematics education: the cognitive constructivist perspective and the sociocultural perspective (Cobb, 1996). According to Cobb, the cognitive constructivist perspective views students as actively constructin…”
BackgroundConceptions of Educational Achievement
Cole, N. S. (1990) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x019003002 · Cited by 423
When Children and Adults Do Not Use Learning Strategies: Toward a Theory of Settings
Garner, R. (1990) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543060004517 · Cited by 438
From Organizational Learning to Practice-Based Knowing
Gherardi, S. (2001) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726701541016 · Cited by 414
“The main characteristic of so-called ‘situated learning theory’ (SLT) has been its discussion (Lave, 1988; Brown et al., 1989) of the concept of ‘context’, in polemic with traditional cognitive theory (TCT) which regards context as the container of decontextualized knowledge (impersonal,”
BackgroundChapter 4: Consequential Transitions: A Sociocultural Expedition Beyond Transfer in Education
Beach, K. (1999) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.2307/1167268 · Cited by 509
Engle, R. A. (2006) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1504_2 · Cited by 410
“The situative assumption that learning and knowledge are inextricably situated in their social and material contexts (e.g., J. S. Brown, Collins, & Duguid, 1989; Hall, 1996; Lave, 1988) seems to imply that knowledge would be so bound to the initial context of learning that it would be impossible for anyone to ever tra…”
BackgroundDurning, S. J., & Artino, A. R. (2011) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/0142159x.2011.550965 · Cited by 399
“In terms of specific situativity theories, Situated Cognition or ‘‘SitCog’’ is a perspective that has been embraced by many (Brown et al. 1989; Resnick et al. 1991; Greeno 1993; Salomon 1993).”
BackgroundWe ARe at home: how augmented reality reshapes mobile marketing and consumer-brand relationships.
Scholz, J., & Duffy, K. (2018) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.05.004 · Cited by 397
“Drawing on a situated cognition perspective, which holds that people can off-load cognitive tasks onto the environment and use the situational context to solve problems (Brown et al., 1989), Hilken and colleagues (2017) thus present AR as a technology that is able to convey information in better ways than, for example…”
BackgroundThe role of models/and analogies in science education: implications from research
Coll, R. K., France, B., & Taylor, I. (2005) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/0950069042000276712 · Cited by 414
“This view of learning is related to the idea of situated cognition (Hennessey 1993), meaning that cognitive processes differ according to the domain of thinking and the specifics of the task context (Brown et al. 1989, Rogoff 1990).”
BackgroundMotivation, Emotion, and Cognition
(2004) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410610515 · Cited by 408
Dickey, M. D. (2006) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-006-9004-7 · Cited by 410
“As Winn and Snyder (1996) noted, research in situated learning reveals that cognition is more likely to be dependent upon context and affordances of a place and situation than to be determined by formal reasoning ( Brown, Collins, & Duguid, 1989; Lave & Wenger, 1991; Suchman, 1987).”
BackgroundThe Design of Goal-Based Scenarios
Schank, R. C., Fano, A., Bell, B., & Jona, M. Y. (1994) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0304_2 · Cited by 382
“In arguing for the inseparability of concepts, activity, and context, Brown et al. (1989) paint a picture of learning in which the situatedness of instruction facilitates comprehension, retention, recognition of the conditions of applicability, and when the situations are varied, transfer.”
BackgroundInfluentialStudent-generated questions: A meaningful aspect of learning in science
Chin, C., & Brown, D. E. (2002) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500690110095249 · Cited by 424
Research on Professional Development for Teachers of Mathematics and Science: The State of the Scene
Loucks‐Horsley, S., & Matsumoto, C. (1999) · School Science and Mathematics · doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.1999.tb17484.x · Cited by 390
Translating Constructivism into Instructional Design: Potential and Limitations.
Karagiorgi, Y., & Symeou, L. (2005) · Cited by 383
Mangaroska, K., & Giannakos, M. N. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2018.2868673 · Cited by 443
“[105], how to design learning activities differently over time [46], [86], and expertise reversal effects [106].”
BackgroundSocial Learning Systems and Communities of Practice
Blackmore, C. (2010) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-84996-133-2 · Cited by 381
Mobile apps for science learning: Review of research
Zydney, J. M., & Warner, Z. B. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.001 · Cited by 416
Representing the learning design of units of learning
Koper, R., & Bill, O. (2004) · DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) · Cited by 383
Effects of Teacher Induction on Beginning Teachers' Teaching
Wang, J., Odell, S. J., & Schwille, S. A. (2008) · Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1177/0022487107314002 · Cited by 422
Honebein, P. C., Duffy, T. M., & Fishman, B. (1993) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-78069-1_5 · Cited by 385
Cognition and Policy Implementation: District Policymakers and the Reform of Mathematics Education
Spillane, J. P. (2000) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1802_01 · Cited by 375
“…can result from collaborative work aid the learning process not only because individuals can learn from one another but also because group interactions surface insights, understandings, and perspectives on a subject that are not possible otherwise (A. Brown & Campione, 1990; J. Brown et al., 1989).”
BackgroundInfluentialSpillane, J. P., & Thompson, C. L. (1997) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/01623737019002185 · Cited by 386
Predicting Student Performance from LMS Data: A Comparison of 17 Blended Courses Using Moodle LMS
Conijn, R., Snijders, C. C. P., Kleingeld, A., & Matzat, U. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2016.2616312 · Cited by 430
“However, the match between these theories and the measurements used for learning analytics is not optimal and other theories such as situated learning [24] or”
BackgroundDisruptive devices: mobile technology for conversational learning
Sharples, M. (2002) · International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning · doi:10.1504/ijceell.2002.002148 · Cited by 369
Putting Case-Based Instruction Into Context: Examples From Legal and Medical Education
Williams, S. M. (1992) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0204_2 · Cited by 367
“Brown et al. (1989) suggested that the practices of contemporary”
BackgroundInfluentialAn instructional strategy framework for online learning environments
Johnson, S. D., & Aragon, S. R. (2003) · New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education · doi:10.1002/ace.117 · Cited by 364
Managing in the Middle: School Leaders and the Enactment of Accountability Policy
Spillane, J. P., Diamond, J. B., Burch, P., Hallett, T., Jita, L. C., & Zoltners, J. (2002) · Educational Policy · doi:10.1177/089590402237311 · Cited by 365
Turning “play” into “work” and “work” into “play”
Lepper, M. R., & Corpus, J. H. (2000) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012619070-0/50032-5 · Cited by 384
Knowing in practice: re-conceptualising vocational expertise
Billett, S. R. (2001) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/s0959-4752(00)00040-2 · Cited by 375
“Another was culture of practice (Brown et al., 1989).”
Videobased lesson analysis: Effective science PD for teacher and student learning
Roth, K. J., Garnier, H., Chen, C., Lemmens, M., Schwille, K., & Wickler, N. I. Z. (2011) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20408 · Cited by 385
Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., Mäkitalo‐Siegl, K., Ahonen, A. K., Näykki, P., & Valtonen, T. (2016) · Teachers and Teaching · doi:10.1080/13540602.2016.1203772 · Cited by 455
Handbook of Research on Effective Electronic Gaming in Education
Ferdig, R. E. (2009) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-59904-808-6 · Cited by 422
Classroom and Individual Differences in Early Adolescents' Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning
Pintrich, P. R., Roeser, R. W., & Groot, E. V. D. (1994) · The Journal of Early Adolescence · doi:10.1177/027243169401400204 · Cited by 382
Kelly, G. J., Brown, C., & Crawford, T. (2000) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/1098-237x(200009)84:5 · Cited by 67
A Qualitative Meta-Analysis of Computer Games as Learning Tools
Ke, F. (2009) · Handbook of Research on Effective Electronic Gaming in Education · doi:10.4018/978-1-59904-808-6.ch001 · Cited by 362
Hofstein, A., Navon, O., Kipnis, M., & Mamlok‐Naaman, R. (2005) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20072 · Cited by 385
“This is highly based on the growing sense that learning is contextualized and that learners construct knowledge by solving genuine and meaningful problems ( Brown, Collins, & Duguit, 1989 ).”
BackgroundAngeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2005) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00135.x · Cited by 361
“In a recent case study, Moallem (1998) found that teachers use socially situated knowledge (Suchman 1987; Brown et al. 1989), which is different from that of formal, scientific, research-based knowledge used in the analysis phase of ISD models.”
BackgroundSchmidt, H. G., van der Molen, H. T., Winkel, W. T., & Wijnen, W. (2009) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520903213592 · Cited by 383
“Would the early developers at the time have had the appropriate terminology available, they would have described their curriculum as constructivist, promoting contextual, collaborative learning, self-regulation, and student agency ( Brown, Collins, & Duguid, 1989 ; E.”
BackgroundEffects of video game playing on measures of spatial performance: Gender effects in late adolescence
Okagaki, L., & Frensch, P. A. (1994) · Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/0193-3973(94)90005-1 · Cited by 375
Resnick, L. Β., Salmon, M. H., Zeitz, C. M., Wathen, S. H., & Holowchak, M. A. (1993) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1080/07370008.1993.9649029 · Cited by 354
Enacting Project-Based Science
Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. M. (1997) · The Elementary School Journal · doi:10.1086/461870 · Cited by 357
“Second, learning is situated; knowledge is contextualized and cannot be easily separated from the situation in which it develops (Brown et al., 1989).”
BackgroundBouillion, L. M., & Gomez, L. M. (2001) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.1037 · Cited by 390
Nicol, D., & Boyle, J. T. (2003) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0307507032000122297 · Cited by 359
“Social constructivism emphasises the underlying social basis of knowledge construction: most learning is socially mediated, with individuals actively constructing their knowledge through dialogue with others (e.g. Doise & Mugny, 1984; Brown et al. , 1989; Lave & Wenger, 1991).”
BackgroundVirtual Reality Training for Health-Care Professionals
Mantovani, F., Castelnuovo, G., Gaggioli, A., & Riva, G. (2003) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/109493103322278772 · Cited by 356
“16,17 Nicaise and Crane 18 point out how, within constructivist perspective, physical engagement with material is central in the learning process.”
A theoretical framework for building online communities of practice with social networking tools
Gunawardena, C. N., Hermans, M. B., Sánchez, D. M., Richmond, C., Bohley, M., & Tuttle, R. (2009) · Educational Media International · doi:10.1080/09523980802588626 · Cited by 385
“Salomon (1993) argues that “if cognitions are distributed, then by necessity they are also situated” (p. 114) as shown by Brown, Collins, and Duguid (1989), whose work has emphasized the need to embed knowledge construction in authentic contexts and distribute the capability required to do an…”
BackgroundCharacteristics of Classroom Mathematics Traditions: An Interactional Analysis
Cobb, P., Wood, T. L., Yackel, E., & McNeal, B. (1992) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312029003573 · Cited by 379
“For example, Skemp (1976) discussed the distinctions between relational and instrumental learning; Brown, Collins, and Duguid (1989) contrasted authentic and unauthentic mathematical activity; and Richards (1991) developed the notions of inquiry mathematics and school mathematics.”
BackgroundWhat Is the Value of Graphical Displays in Learning?
Vekiri, I. (2002) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1023/a:1016064429161 · Cited by 384
Facilitating Elaborative Learning Through Guided Student-Generated Questioning
King, A. (1992) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2701_8 · Cited by 359
Mathematical Modelling: Can It Be Taught And Learnt?
Blum, W. F., & Ferri, R. B. (2009) · Cited by 385
Teachers’ Instructional Adaptations: A Research Synthesis
Parsons, S. A., Vaughn, M., Scales, R. Q., Gallagher, M. A., Parsons, A. W., Davis, S. G., Pierczynski, M., & Allen, M. H. (2017) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654317743198 · Cited by 468
Patterns of core and generic skill provision in higher education
Bennett, N., Dunne, E., & Carré, C. (1999) · Higher Education · doi:10.1023/a:1003451727126 · Cited by 368
Toward a sociocognitive approach to second Llanguage acquisition
Atkinson, D. (2002) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/1540-4781.00159 · Cited by 347
Conceptions of Professional Competence
Mulder, M. (2014) · Springer international handbooks of education · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-8902-8_5 · Cited by 452
Designing collaborative, constructionist and contextual applications for handheld devices
Patten, B., Arnedillo‐Sánchez, I., & Tangney, B. (2006) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.011 · Cited by 350
“This expansion is understandable as the reflective process is an important component of collaboration ( Brown, Collins, & Duguid, 1989 ).”
BackgroundDomain-specific principles affect learning and transfer in children,
Brown, A. L. (1990) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1401_6 · Cited by 371
Virtual reality and gamification in education: a systematic review
Λαμπρόπουλος, Γ., & Kinshuk, K. (2024) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-024-10351-3 · Cited by 569
Ben‐Eliyahu, A., Moore, D. W., Dorph, R., & Schunn, C. D. (2018) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.01.002 · Cited by 422
The relevance of repair for classroom correction
Macbeth, D. H. (2004) · Language in Society · doi:10.1017/s0047404504045038 · Cited by 357
“…that trade on the differences between “knowing that” and “knowing how” (Ryle 1984) have raised the question of just what correct answers can tell us about student learning (e.g., Lave 1984; Bloome et al. 1989; Brown et al. 1989; Resnick et al. 1991; Chaiklin & Lave 1993; Kirshner & Whitson 1997).”
BackgroundSense of place in the practice and assessment of place‐based science teaching
Semken, S. C., & Freeman, C. (2008) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20279 · Cited by 347
Teaching professionalism: general principles
Cruess, R. L., & Cruess, S. R. (2006) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/01421590600643653 · Cited by 348
“While the theory is applicable to all forms of learning, it seems particularly appropriate to educating for the professions, which are communities or cultures joined by ‘‘intricate, socially constructed webs of belief ’’ (Brown et al., 1989, p. 33).”
BackgroundCapps, D. K., Crawford, B. A., & Constas, M. A. (2012) · Journal of Science Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10972-012-9275-2 · Cited by 382
“Theoretical Underpinnings and the Importance of Inquiry Instruction Constructivism in science education centers on the idea that learners should be engaged in answering authentic scientific questions relevant to their lives (Brown et al. 1989; Dewey 1938; Schwab 1976).”
BackgroundInfluentialHow teacher education can make a difference
Korthagen, F. A. J. (2010) · Journal of Education for Teaching International Research and Pedagogy · doi:10.1080/02607476.2010.513854 · Cited by 441
“The popular notion of situated cognition (Brown, Collins, and Duguid 1989 ) concurs with the basic assumption of the three‐level model, namely that knowledge and insight develop in a bottom‐up manner within the context of social experiences.”
BackgroundDesigning technology to support reflection
Lin, X., Hmelo‐Silver, C. E., Kinzer, C. K., & Secules, T. (1999) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02299633 · Cited by 344
“The educational goal for social constructivists is to create social environments that encourage students to construct their own understanding (Brown et al., 1989).”
BackgroundBeating the Odds: Teaching Middle and High School Students to Read and Write Well
Langer, J. A. (2001) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312038004837 · Cited by 352
Mathes, P. G., Denton, C. A., Fletcher, J. M., Anthony, J. L., Francis, D. J., & Schatschneider, C. W. (2005) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1598/rrq.40.2.2 · Cited by 348
A threshold model of content knowledge transfer for socioscientific argumentation
Sadler, T. D., & Fowler, S. (2006) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20165 · Cited by 362
Teaching thinking dispositions: From transmission to enculturation
Tishman, S., Jay, E., & Perkins, D. N. (1993) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1080/00405849309543590 · Cited by 337
“cued and supported by the surrounding environment ( Brown, Collins, & Duguid, 1989; Costa,”
BackgroundSfard, A. (2006) · Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-306-48085-9_1 · Cited by 336
Spillane, J. P., & Zeuli, J. S. (1999) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/01623737021001001 · Cited by 340
Falk, J. H., Storksdieck, M., & Dierking, L. D. (2007) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662506064240 · Cited by 334
Returning to the root: A culturally relevant approach to mathematics pedagogy
Tate, W. F. (1995) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1080/00405849509543676 · Cited by 336
van Joolingen, W., de Jong, T., Lazonder, A. W., Savelsbergh, E. R., & Manlove, S. (2004) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.039 · Cited by 335
“Learners thus develop domain knowledge and, at the same time, familiarize themselves with a scientist’s way of working and thinking (cf. Brown, Collins & Duguid, 1989 ).”
BackgroundCritiquing workplace learning discourses: Participation and continuity at work
Billett, S. R. (2002) · Studies in the Education of Adults · doi:10.1080/02660830.2002.11661461 · Cited by 356
Bolhuis, S. M. (2003) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/s0959-4752(02)00008-7 · Cited by 372
“Studies of ‘situated cognition’ (Brown et al., 1989) and learning outside school (in the workplace, informal learning etc.”
BackgroundSituated learning: Bridging sociocultural and cognitive theorising
Billett, S. R. (1996) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/0959-4752(96)00006-0 · Cited by 331
“Structuring of cognition distributed across social and physical environment (Brown et al., 1989)”
BackgroundInfluentialDistinguishing knowledge-sharing, knowledge-construction, and knowledge-creation discourses
van Aalst, J. (2009) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-009-9069-5 · Cited by 366
“The cognitive processes are “ situated ” because they are mediated (enabled) by social interactions within the particular group that is working together and by the particular technologies used (Brown et al. 1989; Hutchins 1995).”
MethodInternational Handbook of the Learning Sciences
Bodemer, D., Janssen, J. J. H. M., Schnaubert, L., Fischer, F., Hmelo‐Silver, C. E., Goldman, S. R., Reimann, P., van Gog, L., & Interaction, E. A. L. D. I. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315617572 · Cited by 391
Lobato, J. (2006) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1504_1 · Cited by 330
“From a situated perspective, the notion of detaching from concrete experience is problematic because knowledge cannot be isolated from practice and meaningfully studied ( Brown, Collins, & Duguid, 1989; Hall, 1996; Packer, 2001; van Oers, 1998).”
BackgroundConway, P. F., & Clark, C. M. (2003) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/s0742-051x(03)00046-5 · Cited by 332
Teacher Talk and Meaning Making in Science Classrooms: a Vygotskian Analysis and Review
Scott, P. (1998) · Studies in Science Education · doi:10.1080/03057269808560127 · Cited by 344
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P.
- Affiliations
- Institute for Research on Learning, 2550 Hanover Street, Palo Alto, California 94304.
- BBN Inc, 10 Moulton Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02238
- Venue
- Educational Researcher
- Published
- 1989-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 32-42
- ISSN
- 0013-189X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-102X
- OpenAlex
- W2164599981
- Cited by
- 13,645
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 324 · 2025: 322 · 2024: 255 · 2023: 271 · 2022: 384 · 2021: 446 · 2020: 520 · 2019: 472 · 2018: 467 · 2017: 513 · 2016: 525 · 2015: 585 · 2014: 628 · 2013: 637 · 2012: 651
- FWCI
- 128.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Educational Researcher (publishedVersion)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
- Keywords
- situated cognition, learning culture, cognitive apprenticeship, situated knowledge, school culture, mathematics education, conceptual knowledge, everyday cognition, teaching practice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
