The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 2 of the 50 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning
Open accessAbstract
Many teaching practices implicitly assume that conceptual knowledge can be abstracted from the situations in which it is learned and used. This article argues that this assumption inevitably limits the effectiveness of such practices. Drawing on recent research into cognition as it is manifest in everyday activity, the authors argue that knowledge is situated, being in part a product of the activity, context, and culture in which it is developed and used. They discuss how this view of knowledge affects our understanding of learning, and they note that conventional schooling too often ignores the influence of school culture on what is learned in school. As an alternative to conventional practices, they propose cognitive apprenticeship (Collins, Brown, & Newman, in press), which honors the situated nature of knowledge. They examine two examples of mathematics instruction that exhibit certain key features of this approach to teaching.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The paper argues that knowledge is fundamentally situated—partly a product of activity, context, and culture—so teaching methods that treat concepts as abstract, self-contained, and transferable are often misleading and ineffective. As an alternative, it proposes “cognitive apprenticeship,” illustrated through two mathematics teaching examples.
Key findings
- Knowledge is not independent of situations; it is a co-production of mind and world, and abstraction/explication provides an “inherently impoverished and often misleading” view of knowledge.
- Vocabulary taught from dictionary definitions is slow and unsuccessful: the average 17-year-old learns vocabulary at 5,000 words per year (13 per day) over 16 years through listening, talking, and reading, whereas classroom definition-based teaching can cover only 100 to 200 words per year and produces errors such as “I was meticulous about falling off the cliff.”
- Learning is a process of enculturation into authentic activity and culture; school activity is often “ersatz” and self-confirming, so success in school may have little bearing on performance elsewhere.
- Cognitive apprenticeship—using modeling, coaching, fading, social interaction, and collaboration—can enculturate students into authentic practices; the paper examines Schoenfeld’s magic-square problem-solving class and Lampert’s fourth-grade multiplication teaching through coin problems and student-generated stories.
Methods
- Conceptual and theoretical paper, not an empirical study; it synthesizes research on everyday cognition, apprenticeship, situated learning, indexicality, and enculturation.
- Uses illustrative cases and examples, including Miller and Gildea’s vocabulary teaching, Lave’s Weight Watchers cottage-cheese problem, Schoenfeld’s mathematics teaching, and Lampert’s multiplication teaching.
- Main analysis is argumentative: it contrasts JPF, student, and practitioner activity (Table 1) and proposes cognitive apprenticeship as an alternative to conventional didactic schooling.
Limitations
- Stated: the authors describe the exploration as “consciously speculative” and “admittedly tentative”; they say the paper does not attempt a historical survey or critical analysis, and that “major theoretical work” on situated cognition remains to be done.
- Stated: future work must frame the relationship between explicit knowledge and implicit understanding.
- Evident: the paper presents no controlled outcome data or systematic evaluation; its claims about transfer, school culture, and cognitive apprenticeship rest on conceptual argument and illustrative examples.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
118 Own interpretation · 41 Sources not found · 4 No full text of the sources · 2 No basis given · 1 Partly supported · accuracy not yet measured
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“We know from an extensive literature on the subject (diSessa, 1982, 1983, 1986; McCloskey, Caramazza, & Green, 1980; White, 1983) that students have many misconceptions about qualitative phenomena in physics.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites diSessa, 1982, 1983, 1986
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Supportedcites McCloskey, Caramazza, & Green, 1980 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
McCloskey, Caramazza, and Green (1980) is cited as one work in a broader literature supporting the sentence, not as evidence for every misconception in physics. A Semantic Scholar snippet from “Overcoming University Students’ Alternative Conceptions in Newtonian Mechanics” (score 0.493) explicitly attributes undergraduate students’ mistaken predictions about curvilinear motion to McCloskey et al. (1980). The cited paper therefore supports the claim through a concrete example, although paper-scoped searches returned no full-text snippets. (LLM, conf=0.79)
- Could not verifycites White, 1983 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The supplied source, D. W. R. White’s 1983 paper “Plant Regeneration from Mesophyll Protoplasts of White Clover,” concerns plant regeneration, not physics education. Two searches within that paper returned no snippets, but the absence of accessible text prevents a definitive finding about its contents. An unscoped search found only lower-scoring discussions of physics misconceptions in other papers, not a sufficiently strong match to identify the intended White (1983) source. The citation appears mismatched, but the evidence does not meet the threshold for a misattribution verdict. (LLM, conf=0.75)
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The occasions and conditions for use arise directly out of the context of activities of each community or culture that uses the tool, framed by the way members of that culture see the world.”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Miller and Gildea's (1987) work on vocabulary teaching shows how the assumption that knowing and doing can be separated leads to a teaching method that ignores the way situations structure cognition.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Miller and Gildea (1987) source
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Miller and Gildea note that by listening, talking, and reading the average 17-year-old has learned vocabulary at a rate of 5,000 words per year (13 per day) for over 16 years.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Miller and Gildea
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Language use would involve an unremitting confrontation with ambiguity, polysemy, nuance, metaphor, etc., were it not for the extralinguistic help that the context of an utterance provides (Nunberg, 1978).”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Nunberg, 1978
hedgedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Similarly, it is common for students to acquire algorithms, routines, and decontextualized definitions that they cannot use and that therefore lie inert.”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To develop this comparison between tools and knowledge, between manual tools and conceptual tools, a little further, it can be noted that learning how to use a tool involves far more than can be accounted for in any set of explicit rules.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“They are bound by intricate, socially constructed webs of belief, which make it possible to see them as cultures (Geertz, 1983), and which are essential to interpreting what they do.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Geertz, 1983
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because new situations, negotiations, and activities inevitably recast them in a new, more densely textured form, concepts continually evolve with each new occasion of use.”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The authors examine one such method and argue that its lack of success is a direct result of this assumption.”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 54
- It may state two separate claims as one. 36
In the paper
“There is barely enough classroom time, Miller and Gildea suggest, to teach more than 100 to 200 words per year.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Miller and Gildea
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Many teaching methods implicitly assume that conceptual knowledge is independent of the situations in which it is learned and used.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“By contrast, learning words from definitions and sentences abstracted from the context of normal communication, the way vocabulary has often been taught, is slow and unsuccessful.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Miller and Gildea
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Knowledge, we claim, is partially embedded in the social and physical world.”
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is impossible to capture the densely interwoven nature of conceptual knowledge completely in explicit, abstract accounts.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Learning is the process of constructing robust understanding out of this sort of embedded activity.”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Teaching methods, however, often try to impart abstracted conceptual tools as fixed, well-defined, independent entities that can be explored in prototypical examples and textbook exercises.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“And these embedding circumstances allow people to share the burden of solving problems efficiently.”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Knowledge is fundamentally a co-production of the mind and the world, which like woof and warp need each other to produce texture and to complete an otherwise incoherent pattern.”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Teaching, however, often overlooks the central, but restrictive, contribution made by the activities, context, and culture of schools to what is learned there.”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“And the general strategies for intuitive reasoning, resolving issues, and negotiating meaning that people develop through everyday activity are superseded by the precise, well-defined problems, formal definitions, and symbol manipulation that characterize much school activity.”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such ploys indicate how thoroughly learners really are situated, and how they always lean on the embedding context for help.”
hedgedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“So even though students are expected to behave differently, they inevitably do behave like the JPFs they are and solve most of their problems in their own situated way.”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To learn to use tools as practitioners use them, students, like apprentices, must be enabled to enter that community and its culture.”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Unfortunately, students are too often presented with only a part of this complex.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The issues and problems that they face arise out of, are defined by, and are resolved within the constraints of their belief system and the activity they are pursuing.”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Though these are often anathema to traditional schooling, they are an essential component of social interaction and thus of learning.”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Within a culture, ideas are exchanged and modified and belief systems developed and appropriated in part through conversation and narratives”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Learning is instead a continual process needing above all authentic activity to support its development.”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“From here, students can, as we have suggested, use their fledgling conceptual knowledge to see their activity in a new light, which in turn leads to the further development of the conceptual knowledge, and so on.”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When descriptions replace indexical terms (which is analogous, we hold, to classroom descriptions of activity replacing activity), the nature of discourse changes and understanding becomes much more problematic.”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The social network within the culture helps them develop its language and the belief systems and promotes the process of enculturation.”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“They need to observe how qualified practitioners behave and talk to get a sense of how expertise is manifest in conversation and other activities.”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Collaboration also leads to the articulation or manifestation of strategies, which can then be discussed and reflected on.”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If, as we propose, learning is a process of enculturating that is supported in part through social interaction and the circulation of narrative”
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As the students gain more self-confidence and control, they move into a more autonomous phase of collaborative learning, where they begin to participate consciously in the culture.”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The group, however, permits different roles to be displayed and engenders reflective narratives and discussions about the aptness of those roles.”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this sequence, apprenticeship and coaching begin by providing modeling in situ and scaffolding for students to get started in an authentic activity.”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The belief system is instilled in the only way it can be, through practice in which the students actively take part.”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In language learning, for example, the original frail understanding of a word is developed and extended through subsequent use and social negotiation, though each use is no less situated.”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Successful execution of most individual tasks requires students to understand the many different roles needed for carrying out that task.”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This further suggests that a new epistemology might hold the key to a dramatic improvement in learning and completely new insights into education.”
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In educational terms alone, however, the unheralded importance of activity and enculturation to learning suggests that much common practice is the product of an inadequate epistemology.”
hedgedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All knowledge is, we believe, like language. Its constituent parts index the world and so are inextricably a product of the activity and situations in which they are produced and used.”
hedgedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus all concepts--even apparently well-defined, abstract technical concepts--are always under construction. They are never wholly definable, and they defy the sort of categorical descriptions that are conventionally used in teaching: part of their meaning is always inherited from the contexts in which they are used.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The adequacy of the solution they reach becomes apparent in relation to the role it must play in allowing activity to continue.”
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Conceptual tools similarly reflect the cumulative wisdom of the culture in which they are used and the insights and experience of individuals. Their meaning is not invariant but a product of negotiation within a culture and of practice in authentic activity.”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“They are not merely context sensitive; they are completely context dependent. They can only be understood in relation to specific situations, from which indexicals are, for the purposes of interpretation, inseparable.”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“But words and sentences are not islands, entire unto themselves. They rely on the context in which they are used--and not just the linguistic context--to be understood.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Nunberg, 1978
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“He filled a measuring cup two-thirds full of cottage cheese, dumped it out on the cutting board, patted it into a circle, marked a cross on it, scooped away one quadrant, and served the rest.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Lave (1988b)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Instead, it may be more useful to consider conceptual knowledge as in some ways similar to a set of tools.”
hedgedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Learning and acting are, as a result, interestingly indistinct, learning being a continuous, life-long process resulting from acting in situations.”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Tools share several significant features with knowledge; in particular, both can be fully understood in use, and both, if fully understood, change the way their users look at the world.”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Activity, concept, and culture are interdependent. No one can be totally understood without the other two. Learning must therefore involve all three.”
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“His class' goal, by contrast, is to understand the mathematical nature of magic squares, and it is in part by doing this that the belief system is exemplified.”
plainstates a causeSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“So knowledge, which comes coded by and connected to the activity and environment in which it is developed, is spread across its component parts--some of which are in the mind and some in the world--as the final picture on a jigsaw is spread across its component pieces.”
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Conversely, though schooling seeks to encourage problem solving, it disregards most of the inventive heuristics that students bring to the classroom.”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“by pointing to different decompositions, it stresses that heuristics are not absolute, but assessed with respect to a particular task--and that even algorithms can be assessed in this way.”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“by allowing students to generate their own solution paths, it helps make them conscious, creative members of the culture of problem-solving mathematicians.”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Lampert (1986) also involves her students in mathematical exploration, which she tries to make continuous with their everyday knowledge.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Lampert (1986) source
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“And, in enculturating through this activity, they acquire some of the culture's tools--a shared vocabulary and the means to discuss, reflect upon, evaluate, and validate community procedures in a collaborative process.”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The students start with an extended procedure that parallels the story problem above. Eventually they find ways to shorten the process, and they usually arrive at the standard algorithm, justifying their findings with the stories they had created earlier.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Lampert
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the ensuing situations, the appropriateness of the word is tested and, as with all conceptual knowledge, each application has the potential to change an individual's understanding of both the word and the world --the two are interdependent.”
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“She tries to inculcate an inseparable understanding of all of these kinds of knowledge and the connections between them, and thus to bridge the huge gap that emerges from much conventional teaching between conceptual knowledge and problem-solving activity--between, as we characterized them at the beginning, knowing and doing.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Lampert
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Thus, Lampert presents the algorithm as one more useful strategy to help them resolve community problems.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Lampert
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“by beginning with a task embedded in a familiar activity, it shows the students the legitimacy of their implicit knowledge and its availability as scaffolding in apparently unfamiliar tasks.”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Indexical terms are virtually transparent. They, like a signpost, draw little or no attention to themselves.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Eagleton (1983) describes reading as just such an enriching process, through which people continually change how they read and this, in turn, changes what they are reading.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Eagleton (1983)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“By deliberately engaging students in authentic mathematical practice, he reaches well beyond the inculcation of problem-solving skills. His method, much more importantly, provides students with the opportunity to enter the culture of mathematical practice, which enables them to use those skills as practitioners.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Schoenfeld
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boostedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“The class worked collectively through a number of strategies, in which, on reflection, they recognized more general and more powerful mathematical ideas.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Schoenfeld
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a causeSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“prevalent school practices still broadly assume that knowledge is individual and self-structured, that schools are neutral with respect to what is learned in them, that concepts are abstract and immutable and independent of the activity in which they are acquired and used, and that JPF behavior is something to be discouraged.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Schoenfeld is careful to emphasize that all these strategies are illustrated in action, developed by the class, not declared by the teacher.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Schoenfeld
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Lave (1988c) describes how some students feel it necessary to disguise effective strategies so that teachers believe the problems have been solved in the school-approved way.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Lave (1988c)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the terms of cognitive apprenticeship, we can represent the progress of the students from embedded activity to general principles of the culture as presented in Figure 3.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The class went on to explore other possible magic squares and thereby discovered general principles (e.g., an algebraic form for describing them).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Schoenfeld
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a causeSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As an indication that he is working in the culture of mathematics, not in the culture of schooling, he does not stop at what, in culture of school practice, marks the end: an answer.”
hedgedstates an associationSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Schoenfeld's teaching of problem solving (1985, in press) attempts to show college students how to think mathematically about the world, how to see the world through mathematicians' eyes, and thus how to use the mathematician's tools.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Schoenfeld (1985, in press) source
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Recurring features of the environment seem to afford recurrent sequences of actions.”
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This sort of dialectical process is common to all activity, and it similarly undermines any assumption that once conceptual knowledge has been described and applied in exercises, the task of teaching or learning has been finished.”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Schoenfeld's approach, on the other hand, points in particular to the way in which students can be exposed to the authentic ways of thinking of a culture and its conceptual viewpoint, as much as to its subject matter.”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A proposition, as we pointed out above, can only be correctly interpreted in the context of the situation in which it is used.”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“And apprenticeship also suggests the paradigm of situated modeling, coaching, and fading (Collins, Brown, & Newman, 1989), whereby teachers or coaches promote learning first by modeling their strategies for students in authentic activity. Then teachers and colleagues support a student's attempts at doing the task. And finally they empower the student to coatinue independent of the teacher.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Collins, Brown, & Newman, 1989
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“An epistemology that begins with activity and perception, which are first and foremost embedded in the world, may simply bypass the classical problem of reference--of mediating conceptual representations.”
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is at this stage, in short, that students no longer behave as archetypal students but participate in the activity of practitioners and develop their conceptual understanding through social interaction and collaboration in the culture of the domain, not of the school.”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Lave (1988a) and Lave and Wenger (in preparation) point out the importance for apprentices of learning their craft in the appropriate community of practice, towards the center of which they continuously progress through gradual enculturation.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Lave (1988a)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Lave and Wenger (in preparation)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This in turn fosters generalizing, grounded in the students' situated understanding.”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These then occupy a place in our ontology and become something more to learn about rather than simply something useful in learning.”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“groups of practitioners are particularly important, for it is only within groups that social interaction and conversation can take place.”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast, indexical representations seem to gain their efficiency by leaving a great deal of the context underrepresented or implicit.”
hedgedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper relies on this without support.
Most school activity exists in a culture of its own.
“The idea that most school activity exists in a culture of its own helps explain many of the difficulties of cultivating robust domain learning in school.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Schools demand a qualitative change in behavior.
“Schools do seem to demand a qualitative change in behavior, however.”
The paper relies on this without support.
What a student is expected to do and what a JPF does are significantly different.
“What the student is expected to do and what a JPF does are significantly different.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The school situation is extremely specialized.
“But the school situation is extremely specialized.”
The paper relies on this without support.
An unacknowledged dependency on school-based cues makes learning extremely fragile when viewed from outside school.
“Viewed from outside, where problems do not come in text books, an unacknowledged dependency on such school-based cues makes the learning extremely fragile.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Many professions with generally acknowledged cognitive content (e.g., law, medicine, architecture, business) have traditionally been learned through apprenticeship.
“Certainly many professions with generally acknowledged cognitive content--for example, law, medicine, architecture, business, etc.--have nonetheless traditionally been learned through apprenticeship.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Advanced graduate students in humanities, social sciences, and physical sciences acquire extremely refined research skills through apprenticeship with senior researchers.
“Moreover, advanced graduate students in the humanities, the social sciences, and the physical sciences, acquire their extremely refined research skills through the apprenticeship they serve with senior researchers.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Advanced graduate students, like all apprentices, must recognize and resolve ill-defined problems that issue out of authentic activity, in contrast to well-defined exercises typically given in textbooks and exams throughout earlier schooling.
“Then they, like all apprentices, must recognize and resolve the ill-defined problems that issue out of authentic activity, in contrast to the welldefined exercises that are typically given to them in text books and on exams throughout their earlier schooling.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Students who are taught individually rather than collaboratively can fail to develop skills needed for collaborative work.
“Students who are taught individually rather than collaboratively can fail to develop skills needed for collaborative work.”
The paper relies on this without support.
For centuries epistemologists have concentrated primarily on conceptual representation and its problematic relation to objects in the world, assuming that representation is cognitively prior to all else.
“For centuries epistemologists have concentrated primarily on conceptual representation and its problematic relation to objects in the world, assuming that representation is cognitively prior to all else.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Teachers rarely have the opportunity to hear enough of what students think to recognize when the information offered back by students is only a surface retelling for school purposes that may mask deep misconceptions about the physical world and problem-solving strategies.
“Teachers rarely have the opportunity to hear enough of what students think to recognize when the information that is offered back by students is only a surface retelling for school purposes (the handing back of an uncomprehended tool, as we described it at the beginning) that may mask deep misconceptions about the physical world and problem-solving strategies.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A common strategy in trying to overcome difficult pedagogic problems is to make as much as possible explicit.
“A common strategy in trying to overcome difficult pedagogic problems is to make as much as possible explicit.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Constructivist, situated, and sociocultural perspectives define learning as active meaning-making, participation in communities of practice, and identity development [24,25,56].”
From A Systematic Review of Generative AI in K–12: Mapping Goals, Activities, Roles, and Outcomes via the 3P Model (2025) · cites this paper as [56]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“These presentations led to discussions helping teachers create authentic contexts for learning STEM content and practices (Brown et al., 1989; Bruner, 1996; Lave & Wenger, 1991).”
From Increasing high school teachers self-efficacy for integrated STEM instruction through a collaborative community of practice (2020) · cites this paper as Brown et al., 1989
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation.
Bloch, M. E. F., Lave, J., & Wenger, É. (1994) · Man · doi:10.2307/2804509 · Cited by 39,362
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983) · Cited by 5,190
Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities
Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1 · Cited by 5,186
Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life
Lave, J. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609268 · Cited by 5,148
Sæverot, H. (2021) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003193463-8 · Cited by 3,090
Martino, P. D., & Signorini, G. (2019) · ICME-13 monographs · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-10472-6 · Cited by 2,698
Barwise, J., & Perry, J. R. (1981) · The Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.2307/2026578 · Cited by 2,361
Suchman, L. A. (1987) · Cited by 2,279
Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension
(2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315107493 · Cited by 2,245
The Problem of the Essential Indexical
Perry, J. (1979) · Noûs · doi:10.2307/2214792 · Cited by 2,195
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Geertz C, 1983, Local knowledge
- Hutchins E, Situated Learning
- Lave I, 1977, The Quarterly Newsletter of the institute for Comparative Human Development, 1, 1
- Lave J, 1988, Paper presented at AERA annual conference
- Pea RD, 1988, Paper presented at the meeting of the Cognitive Science Society
- Resnick L, 1988, Educational Researcher, 16, 13
- Rogoff B, 1984, Everyday cognition: Its development in social context
- Scribner S, 1984, Everyday cognition: Its development in social context, 9
- Shanker A, 1988, New York Times, 7
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 4,701–4,800 of 13,065
Mixed Initiative Problem Solving with Animated Pedagogical Agents
Lester, J. C., Callaway, C. B., Stone, B., & Towns, S. (1997) · Cited by 17
Cognitive Approaches to Translation
Risku, H. (2020) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0145.pub2 · Cited by 21
Albion, P. (2026) · University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland) · doi:10.26192/9xx90 · Cited by 17
Design-based learning : exploring an educational approach for engineering education
Puente, S. M. G. (2014) · TU/e Research Portal · doi:10.6100/ir771111 · Cited by 21
Report on literature on mobile learning, science and collaborative acitivity
Vavoula, G., Sharples, M., Eileen Scanlon, A., Lonsdale, P., & Jones, A. C. (2005) · HAL · Cited by 17
Breuer, E. (2015) · bonndoc (University of Bonn) · Cited by 17
Schneuwly, B. (1993) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00031496 · Cited by 609
E2LP: A Unified Embedded Engineering Learning Platform
Temerinac, M., Kaštelan, I., Skala, K., et al. (2013) · Euromicro Conference on Digital System Design (DSD) · doi:10.1109/dsd.2013.38 · Cited by 16
“[6] Since the experiments are performed in a laboratory that contains expensive equipment, the students must be supervised which limits the time they have.”
BackgroundClassroom Interactions Around Problem Contexts and Task Authenticity in Middle School Mathematics
Wernet, J. L. W. (2017) · Mathematical Thinking and Learning · doi:10.1080/10986065.2017.1295419 · Cited by 16
Changing Paradigms: From Schooling to Schools as Adaptive Recommendation Systems
Petersen, A. K., Christiansen, R. B., & Gynther, K. (2017) · Universal Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.13189/ujer.2017.051125 · Cited by 16
“Although students are shown the tools of many academic cultures in the course of a school career, the pervasive cultures that they observe, in which they participate, and which some enter quite effectively, are the cultures of school life itself”’ [20].”
BackgroundA Model for Online Music Education
Cremata, R. (2018) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-5109-6.ch010 · Cited by 16
Holmström, A. (2019) · Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jmir.2019.07.005 · Cited by 16
Szteinberg, G., Repice, M. D., Hendrick, C., Meyerink, S., & Frey, R. F. (2020) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.19-05-0091 · Cited by 19
Dohn, N. B., Markauskaitė, L., & Hachmann, R. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-36119-8_5 · Cited by 19
Lovell, C. G., Elswick, R. K., McKay, S. W., et al. (2020) · Journal of Holistic Nursing · doi:10.1177/0898010120962903 · Cited by 16
“Many programs, aesthetic in their nature, effectively link the two components of education that Brown et al. (1989) refer to as “knowing and doing” (p. 32).”
Background“It's a chance to make mistakes”: Processes and outcomes of coding in 2nd grade classrooms
Egbert, J. L., Shahrokni, S. A., Abobaker, R., & Borysenko, N. (2021) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104173 · Cited by 18
Development and validation of a measure of authentic online work
Darling‐Aduana, J. (2021) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-021-10007-6 · Cited by 16
Brown, B. A., Boda, P. A., Ribay, K., Wilsey, M., & Perez, G. A. (2021) · Learning Media and Technology · doi:10.1080/17439884.2021.1948427 · Cited by 20
“While people may be interested in learning about new esoteric concepts, the necessity of engaging in day to day activity embeds situations that require us to learn new things (Brown, Collins, and Duguid 1989; Lave 1991; Lave and Wenger 1991).”
BackgroundInfluentialConversational Agents in Language Education: Where They Fit and Their Research Challenges
Divekar, R. R., Lepp, H., Chopade, P., Albin, A., Brenner, D., & Ramanarayanan, V. (2021) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-90179-0_35 · Cited by 16
“The intersectional perspectives in the figure delineate the bases of situated learning [4], a widely-recognized theory in foreign language acquisition that promotes learning by doing.”
BackgroundMusic Technology in Education – Channeling and Challenging Perspectives
Eiksund, Ø. J., Angelo, E., & Knigge, J. (2020) · doi:10.23865/noasp.108.ch00 · Cited by 16
“Stuck in this wheel”: The use of design thinking for change in educational organizations
VanGronigen, B. A., Bailes, L. P., & Saylor, M. L. (2022) · Journal of Educational Change · doi:10.1007/s10833-022-09462-6 · Cited by 22
FoLA2 — A Method for Co-creating Learning Analytics–Supported Learning Design
Schmitz, M., Scheffel, M., Bemelmans, R., & Drachsler, H. (2022) · Journal of Learning Analytics · doi:10.18608/jla.2022.7643 · Cited by 15
“Every purple card has a name for the set it is part of (A.1) (i.e., Cognitive Apprenticeship, TPACK, Zuyd University’s Educational Vision).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialRethinking the Professional Development of School Leaders
Kochan, F. K., Bredeson, P. V., & Riehl, C. J. (2002) · Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/016146810210400913 · Cited by 16
Rahman, N. F. A., Davies, N., Suhaimi, J., Idris, F., Mohamad, S. N. S., & Park, S. E. (2023) · Education for Primary Care · doi:10.1080/14739879.2023.2248070 · Cited by 16
“Notably, clinical reasoning, as a socially constructed phenomenon, demands medical students to assimilate contextual factors such as socioeconomic, cultural, and demographic attributes into their medical judgements and decisions [39–41].”
BackgroundTowards a constructivist view of instructional explanations as a core practice of science teachers
Kulgemeyer, C., & Geelan, D. (2024) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21863 · Cited by 17
To Be or Not to Be Successful?
Llorente, A. M. P., Gómez, M. C. S., & García‐Peñalvo, F. J. (2015) · Journal of Cases on Information Technology · doi:10.4018/jcit.2015010104 · Cited by 16
König, A. (2015) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2015.08.006 · Cited by 16
“com challenging boundaries of learning environments [22].”
Ramaekers, S. P. J., van Keulen, H., Kremer, W. D. J., Pilot, A., & van Beukelen, P. (2011) · Cited by 16
Cadres de pratiques et circulation des connaissances chez les potières de l' Arewa (Niger)
Corniquet, C. (2011) · Cahiers d études africaines · doi:10.4000/etudesafricaines.16597 · Cited by 16
Putting the “H” in STEAM: Paradigms for Modern Liberal Arts Education
Lewis, A. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-02573-5_14 · Cited by 16
Schudel, I., le Roux, C., Lotz‐Sisitka, H., et al. (2008) · South African Journal of Education · doi:10.15700/saje.v28n4a208 · Cited by 16
Outdoor mathematics trails: an evaluation of one training partnership
Moffett, P. V. (2010) · Education 3-13 · doi:10.1080/03004270903508462 · Cited by 22
“Brown, Collins, and Duguid ( 1989 ) challenge the assumption that conceptual knowledge can be abstracted from the situations in which it is learned and used: ‘Knowledge is situated, being in part a product of the activity, context, and culture in which it is developed and used’ (Brown, Collins, and Duguid 1989 , 32).”
BackgroundInfluentialTarng, W., Yu, C.-S., Liou, F.-L., & Liou, H.-H. (2013) · International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC) · doi:10.1109/iwcmc.2013.6583638 · Cited by 16
The relationship between educational performance and online access routines
Khan, T., Clear, F., & Sajadi, S. S. (2012) · International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) · doi:10.1145/2330601.2330655 · Cited by 16
“[27] highlight the concept of ‘cognitive”
Midwifery students’ evaluation of team-based academic assignments involving peer-marking
Parratt, J., Fahy, K. M., & Hastie, C. R. (2013) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2013.10.002 · Cited by 16
“New knowledge is integrated with existing knowledge and applied to the learner’s own context (24).”
BackgroundNicholl, B., Hosking, I. M., Elton, E., Lee, Y., Bell, J., & Clarkson, P. J. (2012) · International Journal of Technology and Design Education · doi:10.1007/s10798-012-9221-9 · Cited by 18
“Authentic contexts can be defined simply as ‘the ordinary practices of the culture’, which, in the context of this paper would be the culture of engineering design (Brown et al. 1989: 34).”
BackgroundInfluentialLike, Comment, Share: Collaboration and Civic Engagement Within Social Network Sites
Greenhow, C. M., & Li, J. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-4696-5_9 · Cited by 17
Designing Hypercontextualized Games: A Case Study with LieksaMyst
Sedano, C. A. I., Sutinen, E., Vinni, M., et al. (2012) · Cited by 16
Ordóñez, C. L., & Ordóñez, C. L. O. (2011) · LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · Cited by 16
Ferdig, R. E. (2005) · The turkish online journal of educational technology · Cited by 16
The 3 Directions: Situated Information Literacy
Nichols, J. T. (2009) · College & Research Libraries · doi:10.5860/crl.70.6.515 · Cited by 16
Kardash, C. M., & Edwards, O. V. (2011) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-011-9195-0 · Cited by 16
Using Second Life for Just-in-Time Training: Building Teaching Frameworks in Virtual Worlds
Kopp, G., & Burkle, M. (2010) · International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning (iJAC) · doi:10.3991/ijac.v3i3.1373 · Cited by 16
“In the Participation Model, the interactions that the learner contributes to may serve to change their own knowledge base and that of the community even as he or she participates [16].”
BackgroundBrave New World: Can We Engineer a Better Start for Freshers?
White, S., & Carr, L. A. (2006) · 2022 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) · doi:10.1109/fie.2005.1611959 · Cited by 16
“We are aware of the general literature which point out the ways in which building learning communities can enhance student engagement and improve the outcome of undergraduate studies [6-8].”
BackgroundConstructivist project based learning design, a cybernetics approach
Abdulwahed, M. S., Nagy, Z. K., & Blanchard, R. E. (2008) · Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University) · Cited by 16
Miksza, P., & Berg, M. H. (2013) · Journal of Music Teacher Education · doi:10.1177/1057083713480888 · Cited by 18
Limitations of Transmedia Storytelling for Children: A Cognitive Developmental Analysis
Pietschmann, D., Völkel, S., & Ohler, P. (2014) · Cited by 16
Pedagogies for Next Generation Learning Spaces: Theory, Context, Action
Ling, P., & Fraser, K. (2014) · International perspectives on higher education research · doi:10.1108/s1479-362820140000012008 · Cited by 19
Holden, C. L., Gagnon, D., Litts, B. K., & Smith, G. (2013) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-4542-4.ch002 · Cited by 16
Empowering chemistry teachers for context-based education
Pilot, A., Bulte, A. M. W., JONG, O. D., & Stolk, M. (2000) · Cited by 16
Tarng, W. (2017) · Journal of Computers · doi:10.17706/jcp.12.3.270-283 · Cited by 16
“[18], and the purpose is for students to learn under”
BackgroundSadhuwong, K., Koraneekij, P., & Natakuatoong, O. (2016) · NRCT Data Center · doi:10.14456/jhr.2016.56 · Cited by 16
Bridging Technical Skills Gaps between High School Students and Local Employers
Fletcher, E. C., & Tyson, W. (2017) · Journal of Research in Technical Careers · doi:10.9741/2578-2118.1001 · Cited by 16
Verweij, D., Bakker, S., & Eggen, B. H. (2017) · ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces (ISS) · doi:10.1145/3132272.3134122 · Cited by 16
“In cognitive science, this is referred to as distributed cognition [18, 29], situated cognition [11] or extended cognition [12]; a theoretical framework to investigate the coordination between people, artefacts and environments [17].”
BackgroundDesign of an authentic innovation project in Swedish upper secondary technology education
Svärd, J., Schönborn, K. J., & Hällström, J. (2017) · Australasian Journal of Technology Education · doi:10.15663/ajte.v4i1.48 · Cited by 16
“Evolving from work by Brown et al. (1989), situated learning was presented as a method that was especially well-suited to adult learning as advocated by Lave and Wenger (1991). The idea was to bring learning into the environment where it is supposed to be used and applied. Examples could include learning about biology…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialLes observatoires territoriaux
Tonneau, J.-P., Lemoisson, P., Coudel, É., Maurel, P., Jannoyer, M., Bonnal, V., Bourgoin, J., Cattan, P., Chéry, J.-P., Piraux, M., et al. (2017) · Revue internationale de géomatique · doi:10.3166/rig.2017.00035 · Cited by 16
Teaching and learning cultures in higher education: A mismatch in conceptions
Sagy, O., Hod, Y., & Kali, Y. (2019) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2019.1576594 · Cited by 16
“For example, Brown et al. (1989) make a distinction between the traditional school culture and learning in communities of practice.”
BackgroundAuthentic Learning Secure Software Development (SSD) in Computing Education
Qian, K., Lo, D. C.-T., Parizi, R. M., et al. (2018) · 2022 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) · doi:10.1109/fie.2018.8659217 · Cited by 16
“These components form the basis for teachers to plan and design learning environments [10-20].”
BackgroundTwelve tips for designing assignments that foster independence in learning
Rachul, C. M., Collins, B., Ahmed, M., & Cai, G. (2020) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2020.1752914 · Cited by 18
Loucks, S., & Özoğul, G. (2020) · TechTrends · doi:10.1007/s11528-020-00513-4 · Cited by 16
Ramani, D., Soh, M. Y., Merkebu, J., et al. (2020) · Diagnosis · doi:10.1515/dx-2020-0019 · Cited by 16
Designing creative and connected online learning experiences
Gabaree, L. E., Rodeghiero, C., Presicce, C., et al. (2020) · Information and Learning Sciences · doi:10.1108/ils-04-2020-0121 · Cited by 16
Pappa, D., & Papadopoulos, H. (2019) · The Electronic Journal of e-Learning · doi:10.34190/jel.17.2.08 · Cited by 18
Collaboration Analytics Need More Comprehensive Models and Methods: An Opinion Paper
Han, A., Krieger, F., & Greiff, S. (2021) · Journal of Learning Analytics · doi:10.18608/jla.2021.7288 · Cited by 19
Mead, T., Pietsch, C., Matthew, V., Lipkin-Moore, S., Metzger, E. P., Avdeev, I. V., & Ruzycki, N. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su131810172 · Cited by 19
Taylor, J. A., Adams, C. T., Westbrook, A. L., Gee, J. C., Spybrook, J. K., Kowalski, S. M., Gardner, A. L., & Bloom, M. (2021) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21733 · Cited by 17
Rögele, A., Scheiter, K., & Randler, C. (2022) · International Journal of Science Education Part B · doi:10.1080/21548455.2022.2043567 · Cited by 16
“…learning, participation in a CS project might lead to knowledge gains and improvement of scientific reasoning as it can serve as an authentic activity (Brown et al., 1989) during which the cognitive demands for the participants are the same as for professional scientists (Savery & Duffy, 1995).”
BackgroundLearning journey: Conceptualising “change over time” as a dimension of workplace learning
Goh, A. Y. S. (2022) · International Review of Education · doi:10.1007/s11159-022-09942-0 · Cited by 22
“Situated cognition theories (Brown et al. 1989), socio-cultural theories like those of Jean Lave and Etienne Wenger (1991), and cultural-historical activity theory (Engeström 1987, 2001) focus on the nature of work practices, which often overlook the individual workers within the workplace.”
BackgroundSánchez‐Peña, M., Vieira, C., & Magana, A. J. (2022) · Computer Applications in Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/cae.22580 · Cited by 16
“This focuses not just on “how to do,” that is, the mechanical steps involved in completing a task, but “how to think” through and develop an understanding of tasks within a complex social environment [6, 14, 15].”
BackgroundAPPRENTICESHIP AND INTELLECTUAL COMMUNITY: LESSONS FROM THE CARNEGIE INITIATIVE ON THE DOCTORATE
Golde, C. M., Bueschel, A. C., Jones, L., et al. (2006) · Cited by 16
Casual Games and Casual Learning About Human Biological Systems
Price, C. A., Gean, K., Christensen, C., Beheshti, E., Pernot, B., Segovia, G., Person, H., Beasley, S., & Ward, P. (2015) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-015-9580-6 · Cited by 16
“Learners strongly associate what they learn with the complex environment of where and with whom they learned it (Brown et al. 1989).”
BackgroundTheories of Learning and Their Implications for On-Line Assesment
Underhill, A. F. (2006) · DergiPark (Istanbul University) · doi:10.17718/tojde.06989 · Cited by 16
Postsecondary Literacy: Coherence in Theory, Terminology, and Teacher Preparation.
Paulson, E. J., & Armstrong, S. L. (2010) · Journal of developmental education · Cited by 16
Tinkering or Sketching: Apprentices’ Use of Tangibles and Drawings to Solve Design Problems
Jermann, P., Zufferey, G., & Dillenbourg, P. (2008) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-87605-2_19 · Cited by 17
“The remedies proposed by situated learning ([3], [4]) to the problems faced by traditional schooling are well articulated in the ideas of practice fields [5] and authentic learning environments (see synthesis in [6]).”
Implementing Mobile Learning in Developing Countries: Prospects and Challenges
Adesope, O., Olubunmi, S., & McCracken, J. (2007) · EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology · Cited by 16
Implications of Cognitive Science for Instructional Design in Technology Education.
Johnson, S. D., & Thomas, R. G. (1994) · The Journal of Technology Studies · Cited by 16
Caracterización pedagógica de los entornos virtuales de aprendizaje
del Dujo, Á. G., & García, A. V. M. (2002) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · doi:10.14201/teri.2976 · Cited by 16
At-Risk Students and Technology Education: A Qualitative Study
Cardon, P. L. (2000) · The Journal of Technology Studies · doi:10.21061/jots.v26i1.a.8 · Cited by 16
Differ in Socio-Cognitive Processes? Some Comparisons Between Paper and Video Triggered PBL
Lu, J., & Chan, L. K. (2015) · Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning · doi:10.7771/1541-5015.1495 · Cited by 16
Introducing innovative approaches to learning in fluid mechanics: a case study
Gynnild, V., Myrhaug, D., & Pettersen, B. (2007) · European Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1080/03043790701433137 · Cited by 16
“1989 ) and constructivist (Duffy and Jonassen 1992 ).”
State Writing Assessment: Inclusion of Motivational Factors in Writing Tasks
Olinghouse, N. G., Zheng, J., & Morlock, L. A. (2012) · Reading & Writing Quarterly · doi:10.1080/10573569.2012.632736 · Cited by 16
“Because writers may not readily transfer the knowledge they learn in one context to a different context (Brown et al., 1989), academic activities should mirror real-life activities as closely as possible (Cronin, 1993).”
BackgroundForbes, A., & Skamp, K. R. (2012) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-012-9295-0 · Cited by 19
“Ideas about communities of practice are grounded in social constructivism (Brown et al. 1989; Vygotsky 1978). Lave and Wenger’s (1991) seminal CoP work studied apprenticeship as a learning model.”
BackgroundA review of approaches to teaching thinking: appropriate approach for Iran education system
Sedaghat, M., & Rahmani, S. (2011) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.202 · Cited by 16
Designing and evaluating a STEM teacher learning opportunity in the research university
Hardré, P. L., Ling, C., Shehab, R. L., et al. (2013) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2013.11.002 · Cited by 16
Stichwort: Alte oder neue Lernkultur?
Meyer, M. A. (2005) · Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s11618-005-0120-7 · Cited by 18
What Works for Them? Preservice Teachers' Perceptions of Their Learning from Video Cases
Yadav, A. (2008) · Action in Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/01626620.2008.10463467 · Cited by 16
Hannah, D. R., & Venkatachary, R. (2009) · Organizational Behavior Teaching Review · doi:10.1177/1052562909333983 · Cited by 16
“The fundamental argument for designing “authentic” experiential activities in teaching is that activities that are situated in context facilitate high-level conceptual understanding and an opportunity for immediate application (Brown et al., 1989; Petraglia, 1998).”
BackgroundYup’ik Cosmology to School Mathematics: The Power of Symmetry and Proportional Measuring
Lipka, J., Andrew–Ihrke, D., & Yanez, E. (2011) · Interchange · doi:10.1007/s10780-011-9153-4 · Cited by 18
Kang, J., & Purnell, C. B. (2011) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.10-09-0124 · Cited by 15
Learning to Teach Mathematics for Understanding in the Company of Mentors
Wolf, N. (2003) · Teachers and Teaching · doi:10.1080/13540600309370 · Cited by 16
Ogata, H., Miyata, M., Hou, B., et al. (2010) · International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation · doi:10.1504/ijmlo.2010.037532 · Cited by 16
Embedded Knowledge in Transportation Engineering: Comparisons between Engineers and Instructors
Davis, S. G., Brown, S., Dixon, M. P., Borden, R., & Montfort, D. B. (2012) · Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice · doi:10.1061/(asce)ei.1943-5541.0000119 · Cited by 16
Thinking outside the box a vision of ambient learning displays
Börner, D., rner, N. A., Kalz, M., et al. (2011) · International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning · doi:10.1504/ijtel.2011.045450 · Cited by 16
“Situated cognition suggests that learning is naturally tied to authentic activity, context and culture (Brown et al., 1989).”
BackgroundDeveloping designs for community development in four types of student teacher groups
Dobber, M., Akkerman, S. F., Verloop, N., Admiraal, W., & Vermunt, J. D. H. M. (2012) · Learning Environments Research · doi:10.1007/s10984-012-9116-4 · Cited by 15
García, I., & Cano, E. (2011) · Computer Applications in Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/cae.20574 · Cited by 16
“The use of these tools and the meaningful artifacts construction along the learning process, are elements of the authentic learning approach presented by Brown [16].”
MethodInfluentialKatz-Buonincontro, J. L., & Hektner, J. M. (2014) · Journal of Educational Administration · doi:10.1108/jea-12-2012-0135 · Cited by 16
Reflective Redo From the Point of Error
Scoresby, J., & Shelton, B. E. (2014) · Simulation & Gaming · doi:10.1177/1046878114549426 · Cited by 19
“J. S. Brown, Collins, and Duguid (1989) reported that knowledge and context are inextrica-bly connected, and without a meaningful context, knowledge or learning will not change.”
BackgroundChung, L.-Y. (2012) · International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (WAINA) · doi:10.1109/waina.2012.198 · Cited by 16
“Virtual reality literally means a “simulated reality”, one that is generated by computer technologies to create a “make-believe” world.”
BackgroundCondições e desafios ao surgimento de comunidades de prática em organizações
de Souza-Silva, J. C. (2009) · Revista de Administração de Empresas · doi:10.1590/s0034-75902009000200005 · Cited by 16
A case study of one high performance baseball coach’s experiences within a learning community
Kuklick, C. R., Gearity, B. T., Thompson, M. R., & Neelis, L. (2015) · Qualitative Research in Sport Exercise and Health · doi:10.1080/2159676x.2015.1030343 · Cited by 19
“Other low functioning learning communities contain a diverse group of practitioners who lack interaction and therefore do no promote collaborative engagement in solving problems at work (Brown et al. 1989, Duguid 2005).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P.
- Affiliations
- Institute for Research on Learning, 2550 Hanover Street, Palo Alto, California 94304.
- BBN Inc, 10 Moulton Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02238
- Venue
- Educational Researcher
- Published
- 1989-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 32-42
- ISSN
- 0013-189X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-102X
- OpenAlex
- W2164599981
- Cited by
- 13,645
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 324 · 2025: 322 · 2024: 255 · 2023: 271 · 2022: 384 · 2021: 446 · 2020: 520 · 2019: 472 · 2018: 467 · 2017: 513 · 2016: 525 · 2015: 585 · 2014: 628 · 2013: 637 · 2012: 651
- FWCI
- 128.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Educational Researcher (publishedVersion)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
- Keywords
- situated cognition, learning culture, cognitive apprenticeship, situated knowledge, school culture, mathematics education, conceptual knowledge, everyday cognition, teaching practice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
