The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Developmental Perspective on Standardized Achievement Testing
Abstract
Throughout the 1980s there was a proliferation of achievement testing in America to promote and assure the effectiveness of educational reforms. However, both traditional innovative forms of assessment failed to consider the cumulative impact of repeated testing on students” attitudes and motivation. Our surveys of students in Grades 2–11 revealed that by adolescence many students become suspicious and cynical about tests. A large number of students, especially low achievers, become anxious about tests, cheat, try half-heartedly, or use poor test-taking strategies. These reactions may preserve students’ feeling of competence when they receive low test scores, but they undermine the validity of the test scores and discourage genuine learning. A developmental perspective on testing may prevent students’ counterproductive reactions and may help to guide reforms in educational assessment.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“attempts to maximize student and school scores appear to result in a lack of attention to the kinds of higher-order thinking involved in formative assessment (Paris et al. , 1991).”
From Teachers developing assessment for learning: impact on student achievement (2004) · cites this paper as Paris et al., 1991
In the citing paper
“However, the introduction of high-stakes state-mandated testing, such as now exists in England and most states in the USA, makes the effective implementation of formative assessment even more difficult.”
From Teachers developing assessment for learning: impact on student achievement (2004) · cites this paper as Paris et al., 1991
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- 10.1111/j.1745-3992.1988.tb00837.x · DOI
- Benjamin M, 1987, Journal of Educational Psychology, 59, 128
- Cannell JJ, 1989, How public educators cheat on standardized achievement tests
- 10.2307/1130113 · DOI
- Covington MV, 1983, Learning and motivation in the classroom, 139
- Csikszentimihalyi M, 1975, Beyond boredom and anxiety
- 10.1037/0022-3514.36.5.451 · DOI · Paper page
- Evans M, 1989, Paper presented at the Society for Research in Child Development
- Fyans LJ, 1979, Paper presented at the Educational Testing Service, Princeton
- 10.3102/0013189X020005002 · DOI
- Halter S, 1985, The development of the self
- Hill KT, 1984, Research on motivation in education,, 1, 245
- 10.2307/1165770 · DOI
- 10.1086/461395 · DOI
- Jervis K, 1989, Educational Leadership, 46, 10
- 10.1080/07481756.1984.12022749 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-94-009-7386-2 · DOI
- 10.1177/0895904887001002002 · DOI
- Linn RL, 1990, Comparing state and district test results to national norms: Interpretations of "Scoring above the national average" (Tech. Rep. No. 308).
- Madaus GF, 1990, The Chronicle of Higher Education, A52
- 10.1111/j.1745-3992.1989.tb00304.x · DOI
- National Commission on Testing and Public Policy, 1990, Reforming assessment: From gatekeepers to gateway to education
- Nichoils JG, 1989, The competitive ethos and democratic education
- Nolen SB, 1990, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association and the National Council for Measurement in Education
- 10.1007/978-1-4612-3618-4_7 · DOI
- Resnick LB, 1989, Proceedings of the 1989 ETS Invitational Conference: The uses of standardized tests in American education, 63
- Rothman R, 1990, Education Week, 10, 1 ff
- 10.2307/1130719 · DOI
- Weiner B, 1984, Research on motivation in education, 1, 15
- 10.1207/s15326985ep2402_3 · DOI
- Wiggins G, 1989, Phi Delta Kappan, 70, 703
- Winograd P, 1989, Educational Leadership, 46, 30
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Teachers developing assessment for learning: impact on student achievement
Wiliam *, D., Lee, C., Harrison, C., & Black, P. (2004) · Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594042000208994 · Cited by 664
Metadata
- Authors
- Paris, S. G., Lawton, T. A., Turner, J. C., & Roth, J. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Venue
- Educational Researcher
- Published
- 1991-06
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 12-20
- ISSN
- 0013-189X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-102X
- OpenAlex
- W1997984114
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 14.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Educational Researcher (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Improvement
- Keywords
- test anxiety, student attitudes toward testing, test-taking strategies, cheating, low achievers, student motivation, test validity, educational assessment reform
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
