The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Causal Explanation, Qualitative Research, and Scientific Inquiry in Education
Abstract
A National Research Council report, Scientific Research in Education, has elicited considerable criticism from the education research community, but this criticism has not focused on a key assumption of the report—its Humean, regularity conception of causality. It is argued that this conception, which also underlies other arguments for “scientifically-based research,” is narrow and philosophically outdated, and leads to a misrepresentation of the nature and value of qualitative research for causal explanation. An alternative, realist approach to causality is presented that supports the scientific legitimacy of using qualitative research for causal investigation, reframes the arguments for experimental methods in educational research, and can support a more productive collaboration between qualitative and quantitative researchers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research
King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994) · Princeton University Press · doi:10.1515/9781400821211 · Cited by 7,225
SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010) · doi:10.4135/9781506335193 · Cited by 6,215
Studies in the Logic of Explanation
Hempel, C. G., & Oppenheim, P. (1948) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/286983 · Cited by 3,174
Understanding and Validity in Qualitative Research
Maxwell, J. (1992) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.62.3.8323320856251826 · Cited by 2,951 · cited 2×
“…constructivist, or postmodern positions, which have often been invoked as stances for qualitative research, realism emphasizes the fundamental importance of validity issues (Hammersley, 1992; Maxwell, 1992, 2002, 2004), as well as the legitimacy of causal explanation, in qualitative research.”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Cited by
Desimone, L. M. (2009) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x08331140 · Cited by 4,862
Validity in qualitative research revisited
Cho, J., & Trent, A. (2006) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/1468794106065006 · Cited by 1,037
Using Numbers in Qualitative Research
Maxwell, J. A. (2010) · Qualitative Inquiry · doi:10.1177/1077800410364740 · Cited by 985
Self-citationThe educational benefits claimed for physical education and school sport: an academic review
Bailey, R., Armour, K., Kirk, D., Jess, M., Pickup, I., Sandford, R., & P, B. P. E. A. S. (2009) · Research Papers in Education · doi:10.1080/02671520701809817 · Cited by 869
District Policy and Teachers’ Social Networks
Coburn, C. E., & Russell, J. L. (2008) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/0162373708321829 · Cited by 668
Metadata
- Authors
- Maxwell, J. A.
- Venue
- Educational Researcher
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 3-11
- ISSN
- 0013-189X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-102X
- OpenAlex
- W2037302630
- Cited by
- 778
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 121.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Causal Explanation, Qualitative Research, and Scientific Inquiry in Education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3102/0013189x033002003
- The paper
- Maxwell, J. A. (2004). Causal Explanation, Qualitative Research, and Scientific Inquiry in Education. Educational Researcher. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x033002003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
