Cited by 1,037Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsQualitative Research Methods and EthicsEducational Research and Methods

Validity in qualitative research revisited

Open access
Cho, Jeasik, Trent, Allen·2006·Qualitative Research

Abstract

Concerns with the issues of validity in qualitative research have dramatically increased. Traditionally, validity in qualitative research involved determining the degree to which researchers’ claims about knowledge corresponded to the reality (or research participants’ construction of reality) being studied. The authors note that recent trends have shown the emergence of two quite different approaches to the validity question within the literature on qualitative research. The authors categorize and label these ‘transactional’ validity and ‘transformational’ validity. While useful, the authors assert that neither approach is sufficient to meet the current needs of the field. The authors propose a recursive, process-oriented view of validity as an alternative framework.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1468794106065006

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cho, J., & Trent, A.
Affiliations
University of Wyoming (US)
Venue
Qualitative Research
Published
2006-08
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
319-340
ISSN
  • 1468-7941 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-3109
OpenAlex
W2104275035
Cited by
1,037
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 61 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 83 · 2015: 81 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 40
FWCI
49.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Qualitative Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
Keywords
validity, epistemology of qualitative research, construction of reality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review