Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 432

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 91 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Standards of Evidence in Qualitative Research: An Incitement to Discourse

Freeman, Melissa, deMarrais, Kathleen, Preissle, Judith, Roulston, Kathryn, St. Pierre, Elizabeth A.·2007·Educational Researcher
DOI 10.3102/0013189x06298009
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In a climate of increased accountability, standardization, federal control, and politicization of education research and scholarship, this article briefly reviews various positions outlined by qualitative researchers about quality in qualitative inquiry, showing how these are implicated in the acquisition, conceptualization, and use of qualitative evidence. It concludes by identifying issues in and challenges to setting standards of evidence for qualitative researchers in education.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3102/0013189x06298009

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 91 references

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. American Educational Research Association, 2002, Ethical standards of the American Educational Research Association: Cases and commentary
  2. 10.3102/0013189X028005012 · doi:10.3102/0013189x028005012 · Paper page
  3. Duneier M, 1999, Sidewalk
  4. 10.1111/j.1467-9752.2006.00510.x · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9752.2006.00510.x
  5. 10.1177/107780040000600210 · doi:10.1177/107780040000600210
  6. 10.3102/0013189X019004002 · doi:10.3102/0013189x019004002 · Paper page
  7. Lather P, 2004, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association
  8. Lincoln YS, 2002, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education
  9. Lortie D, 1975, Schoolteacher: A sociological study
  10. 10.3102/0013189X013005020 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.3102/0013189X025001020 · doi:10.3102/0013189x025001020 · Paper page
  12. Naroll R, 1962, Data quality control—A new research technique: Prolegomena to a cross-cultural study of culture stress
  13. National Research Council, 2002, Committee on Scientific Principles for Education Research
  14. Olson G, 1991, Journal of Advanced Composition, 11, 245
  15. Peshkin A, 1988, Educational Researcher, 17, 17
  16. Rorty RM, 1967, The linguistic turn: Essays in philosophical method
  17. Ruccio DF, 2003, Postmodern moments in modern economics
  18. Soyfer VN, 1994, Lysenko and the tragedy of Soviet science
  19. Stake R, 1982, Review Journal of Philosophy and Social Science, 7, 1
  20. 10.1080/10570319409374480 · doi:10.1080/10570319409374480

Cited by

See all 432

Metadata

Authors
Freeman, M., deMarrais, K., Preissle, J., Roulston, K., & St. Pierre, E. A.
Venue
Educational Researcher
Publisher
American Educational Research Association (AERA)
Published
2007-01
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
25-32
ISSN
  • 0013-189X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-102X
DOI
10.3102/0013189x06298009
OpenAlex
W2157411361
Cited by
432
References
91
FWCI
102.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Standards of Evidence in Qualitative Research: An Incitement to Discourse. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3102/0013189x06298009
The paper
Freeman, M., deMarrais, K., Preissle, J., Roulston, K., & St. Pierre, E. A. (2007). Standards of Evidence in Qualitative Research: An Incitement to Discourse. Educational Researcher. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x06298009

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.