Cited by 45Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsEvaluation and Performance AssessmentAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques

Comments on Slavin : Synthesizing Causal Inferences

Briggs, Derek C.·2008·Educational Researcher

Abstract

When causal inferences are to be synthesized across multiple studies, efforts to establish the magnitude of a causal effect should be balanced by an effort to evaluate the generalizability of the effect. The evaluation of generalizability depends on two factors that are given little attention in current syntheses: construct validity and external validity. The author concludes with six concrete suggestions for ways that future syntheses could be improved to make them more relevant for educational policy makers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3102/0013189x08314286

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Christ reported that the number of data points, quality of data, and method used to estimate growth each influenced the reliability, validity, and precision of estimated growth, with 14 weeks of intervention required for reliable and valid estimates of slope.

    “Finally, and most recently, Christ [89] reported that the number of data points, quality of data, and method used to estimate growth each influenced the reliability, validity, and precision of estimated growth” (p.15) with 14 weeks of intervention required for reliable and valid estimates of slope.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Briggs, D. C.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Corresponding author
Briggs, Derek C.
Venue
Educational Researcher
Published
2008-01
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
15-22
ISSN
  • 0013-189X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-102X
OpenAlex
W2002592390
Cited by
45
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational Researcher (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Keywords
causal inference, meta-analysis, generalizability, construct validity, education policy, evidence synthesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review