The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Design-Based Research: A Decade of Progress in Education Research?
Abstract
Design-based research (DBR) evolved near the beginning of the 21st century and was heralded as a practical research methodology that could effectively bridge the chasm between research and practice in formal education. In this article, the authors review the characteristics of DBR and analyze the five most cited DBR articles from each year of this past decade. They illustrate the context, publications, and most popular interventions utilized. They conclude that interest in DBR is increasing and that results provide limited evidence for guarded optimism that the methodology is meeting its promised benefits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010) · doi:10.4135/9781506335193 · Cited by 6,215
Design Experiments in Educational Research
Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x032001009 · Cited by 3,548
Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground
Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1 · Cited by 2,642 · cited 5×
“Despite the numerous articles extolling the benefits of DBR, there has been a number of useful critiques—notably Barab and Squire’s (2004) article. They argued that “if a researcher is intimately involved in the conceptualization, design, development, implementation, and re-searching of a pedagogical approach, then en…”
InfluentialKlopfer, E., & Squire, K. (2008) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-007-9037-6 · Cited by 989
Cited by
Research–Practice Partnerships in Education: Outcomes, Dynamics, and Open Questions
Coburn, C. E., & Penuel, W. R. (2016) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x16631750 · Cited by 939
Does ChatGPT enhance student learning? A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies
Deng, R., Jiang, M., Yu, X., Lu, Y., & Liu, S. (2025) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105224 · Cited by 531
Developing an AI-based chatbot for practicing responsive teaching in mathematics
Lee, D., & Yeo, S. (2022) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104646 · Cited by 210
A Historical Review of Collaborative Learning and Cooperative Learning
Yang, X. (2023) · TechTrends · doi:10.1007/s11528-022-00823-9 · Cited by 199
Liu, J. E., Lo, Y. Y., & Lin, A. M. Y. (2020) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2020.102276 · Cited by 132
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J.
- Venue
- Educational Researcher
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 16-25
- ISSN
- 0013-189X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-102X
- OpenAlex
- W2132242306
- Cited by
- 2,138
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 401.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
