Cited by 127Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsEducational Research and MethodsAcademic integrity and plagiarism

Outcome-Reporting Bias in Education Research

Open access
Pigott, Therese D., Valentine, Jeffrey C., Polanin, Joshua R., Williams, Ryan T., Canada, Dericka D.·2013·Educational Researcher

Abstract

Outcome-reporting bias occurs when primary studies do not include information about all outcomes measured in a study. When studies omit findings on important measures, efforts to synthesize the research using systematic review techniques will be biased and interpretations of individual studies will be incomplete. Outcome-reporting bias has been well documented in medicine and has been shown to lead to inaccurate assessments of the effects of medical treatments and, in some cases, to omission of reports of harms. This study examines outcome-reporting bias in educational research by comparing the reports of educational interventions from dissertations to their published versions. We find that nonsignificant outcomes were 30% more likely to be omitted from a published study than statistically significant ones.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3102/0013189x13507104

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pigott, T. D., Valentine, J. C., Polanin, J. R., Williams, R. T., & Canada, D. D.
Affiliations
  • Loyola University Chicago, IL
  • University of Louisville (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • University of Memphis (US)
  • Boston College (US)
Venue
Educational Researcher
Published
2013-11
Volume
42
Issue
8
Pages
424-432
ISSN
  • 0013-189X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-102X
OpenAlex
W2122723488
Cited by
127
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
7.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Educational Researcher (publishedVersion)
  • Loyola eCommons (Loyola University of Chicago) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
Keywords
selective reporting, educational intervention, dissertations, publication bias, non-significant results, evidence synthesis, educational research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review