Cited by 20Educational Assessment and ImprovementSchool Choice and PerformanceGlobal Educational Policies and Reforms

Toward a framework for public accountability in education reform

Open access
Hutt, Ethan, Polikoff, Morgan S.·2020·Educational Researcher

Abstract

Public accountability through information disclosure is a pillar of modern education reform efforts. Despite the ubiquity of this approach, we argue that public accountability in education is undertheorized and often predictably unlikely to achieve its intended policy goals. Drawing on examples from an equity-oriented court case in California and the literatures on democratic engagement and parent use of school performance data, we propose a framework for thinking about the design of public accountability systems in education. The framework could provide guidance for policymakers considering new efforts at improving schools through the production and dissemination of educational data.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3102/0013189x20931246

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hutt, E., & Polikoff, M. S.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Hutt, Ethan
Venue
Educational Researcher
Published
2020-06-09
Volume
49
Issue
7
Pages
503-511
ISSN
  • 0013-189X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-102X
OpenAlex
W3035387381
Cited by
20
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3
FWCI
3.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Educational Researcher (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • Directorate for Education and Human Resources (1445654)
  • William T. Grant Foundation (183913)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Educational Policies and Reforms
Keywords
public accountability, educational reform, information disclosure, school performance data, democratic participation, educational equity, court cases, school improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review