The DOI matches its Crossref record; 93 of the 95 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consequences of Failure to Meet Assumptions Underlying the Fixed Effects Analyses of Variance and Covariance
Abstract
The effects of violating the assumptions underlying the fixed-effects analyses of variance (ANOVA) and covariance (ANCOVA) on Type-I and Type-II error rates have been of great concern to researchers and statisticians. The major effects of violation of assumptions are now well known, after nearly four decades of research. Early summaries and reviews by Hey (1938), Garret and Zubin (1943), Grant (1944), and Gourlay (1955) and more recent reviews by Bradley (1963), Atiqullah (1967), Elashoff (1969) and Scheffe (1959, Ch. 10) can be extended and updated with recent research which provides closure to an area of active inquiry. (For a review of the effects of violation of the assumptions of the randomeffects ANOVA-a subject not reviewed here-the reader is directed to Scheffe, 1959, pp. 334-337 and Box & Anderson, 1962.) Asking whether ANOVA and ANCOVA assumptions are satisfied is not idle curiosity. The assumptions of most mathematical models are always false to a greater or lesser extent. The relevant question is not whether ANOVA assumptions are met exactly, but rather whether the plausible violations of the assumptions have serious consequences on the validity of probability statements based on the standard assumptions. Applied statistics in education and the social sciences experienced a largely unnecessary hegira to non-parametric statistics during the 1950s. Increasingly during the 1950s and early 1960s the fixed-effects, normal theory ANOVA was replaced by such comparable no…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We focus on fairly drastic non-normality because only little bias can be expected from minor violations (Bishara & Hittner, 2012; Glass et al., 1972; Hack, 1958; Puth et al., 2014).”
From Violating the normality assumption may be the lesser of two evils (2021) · cites this paper as Glass et al., 1972
In the citing paper
“For instance, when applying a t test that assumes equal variances in both groups to data that come from substantially different variances (e.g., σ12/ σ22 = 0.1), then high rates of type I errors (e.g., 23%) may be obtained in a situation where sample sizes are unbalanced (N1 = 15, N2 = 5), namely when the small sample comes from the more variable group (Glass et al., 1972; Miller, 1986).”
From Violating the normality assumption may be the lesser of two evils (2021) · cites this paper as Glass et al., 1972
In the citing paper
“Violating this assumption may result in more notable increases of type I errors (compared to what we examined here) at least when the violations are drastic.”
From Violating the normality assumption may be the lesser of two evils (2021) · cites this paper as Glass et al., 1972
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences
Guitton, H., & Siegel, S. (1958) · Revue économique · doi:10.2307/3498751 · Cited by 35,279
Statistical principles in experimental design.
Winer, B. J. (1962) · McGraw-Hill Book Company · doi:10.1037/11774-000 · Cited by 27,137
Principles and Procedures of Statistics
Robinson, H. F. (1961) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj1961.00021962005300050002x · Cited by 17,727
An Analysis of Transformations
Box, G. E. P., & Cox, D. R. (1964) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1964.tb00553.x · Cited by 15,356
Statistical Methods for Research Workers
Fisher, R. A. (1945) · American Journal of Clinical Pathology · doi:10.1093/ajcp/15.11.552b · Cited by 10,883
Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences
McGinn, L. C. (1957) · Journal of the Franklin Institute · doi:10.1016/0016-0032(57)90766-4 · Cited by 7,284
Journal of The American Statistical Association
Fienberg, S. E. (2004) · Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences · doi:10.1002/0471667196.ess1317 · Cited by 6,289
Scheffé, H. (1960) · Soil Science · doi:10.1097/00010694-196006000-00016 · Cited by 5,625
On Methods in the Analysis of Profile Data
Greenhouse, S. W., & Geisser, S. (1959) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02289823 · Cited by 4,946
THE GENERALIZATION OF ‘STUDENT'S’ PROBLEM WHEN SEVERAL DIFFERENT POPULATION VARLANCES ARE INVOLVED
WELCH, B. L. (1947) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/34.1-2.28 · Cited by 4,135
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- Atiqullah M, 1967, Bulletin of the Institute of Statistical Research and Training, 1, 77
- Behrens WU, 1929, Landweise Jahresbuch, 68, 807
- Gayen AK, 1949, Biometrika, 36, 353
- Glass GV, 1970, Statistical methods in education and psychology
- Horsnell G, 1953, Biometrika, 40, 28
- KohrRLA comparison of statistical procedures for testing μ 1 = μ 2 with unequal n ’s and variances1970Pennsylvania State UniversityDoctoral dissertation
- Lindquist EF, 1953, Design and analysis of experiments in education and psychology
- Lunney GH, 1969, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association
- Mandeville GK, 1969, A Monte Carlo investigation of the adequacy of standard analysis of variance test procedures for dependent binary variates
- Pitman EJG, 1937, Biometrika, 29, 322
- Porter AC, 1967, The effects of using fallible variables in the analysis of covariance, Ph.D
- Pratt JW, 1964, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 59, 665
- Quesnel CE, 1947, Skandanavian Aktuarietids, 30, 44
- van der Vaart HR, 1961, Quantative methods in pharmacology, 140
- Welch BL, 1947, Biometrika, 34, 28
- 10.2466/pms.1963.16.2.588 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 999
Wu, Y. B. (1984) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164484443011 · Cited by 26
Kleinheksel, A. J., & Ritzhaupt, A. D. (2017) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.005 · Cited by 26
Nylander, I., Todkar, A., Granholm, L., Vrettou, M., Bendre, M., Boon, W., Andershed, H., Tuvblad, C., Nilsson, K. W., & Comasco, E. (2016) · Molecular Neurobiology · doi:10.1007/s12035-016-0157-z · Cited by 27
“The interaction effect of FKBP5 rs1360780 genotype and parent-child relationship on AUDIT was estimated by univariate ANOVA GLM test with type III sum of square test, which allows adjusting for the main effect of the two factors of interest and is considered robust to violations of normality [34].”
MethodMozzi, A., Riva, V., Forni, D., Sironi, M., Marino, C., Molteni, M., Riva, S., Guerini, F. R., Clerici, M., Cagliani, R., et al. (2017) · American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B Neuropsychiatric Genetics · doi:10.1002/ajmg.b.32546 · Cited by 28
Hughes, C. M. L., Padilla, A. S., Hintze, A., Mariscal, T., Sera, M., Weidner, S., Ontiveros, J., Peng, T., Encarcion, A., Cruz, Z. A., et al. (2019) · Health Informatics Journal · doi:10.1177/1460458219868356 · Cited by 26
Masikane, S. L., Novela, P., Mohale, P., et al. (2019) · Crop Protection · doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2019.105008 · Cited by 26
An Evaluation of a Juvenile Education Program in a State Penitentiary
Locke, T. P., Johnson, G. M., Kirigin, K. A., et al. (1986) · Evaluation Review · doi:10.1177/0193841x8601000302 · Cited by 26
Illusory Sensation of Movement Induced by Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Christensen, M. S., Lundbye‐Jensen, J., Grey, M. J., Vejlby, A. D., Belhage, B., & Nielsen, J. B. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013301 · Cited by 28
“Repeated measures ANOVA were used to test the effect of sensory nerve block (INB and SB) and stimulation site (M1, PMd, SMA, PPC in the INB experiment; M1, PMd, S1, BA5, PPC in the SB experiment) and the interaction (block × site) on the induced sensation of movement. The data were not normally distributed, however th…”
MethodDeChenne‐Peters, S. E., Rakus, J. F., Parente, A., Mans, T. L., Eddy, R. M., Galport, N., Koletar, C., Provost, J. J., Bell, J. E., & Bell, J. K. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0282170 · Cited by 31
“ANOVA and ANCOVA are robust to violations of assumptions when they are slight to moderate or when other assumptions are met [63].”
BackgroundThe Importance of Cognition and Affect for Artificially Intelligent Decision Makers
Melo, C. D., Gratch, J. S., & Carnevale, P. J. D. (2014) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v28i1.8748 · Cited by 25
Theoretical and Empirical Efficiency of Sampling Strategies for Estimating Upper Arm Elevation
Liv, P., Mathiassen, S. E., & Svendsen, S. W. (2011) · The Annals of Occupational Hygiene · doi:10.1093/annhyg/meq095 · Cited by 25
“…regard the assumptions of (i) normally distributed data, (ii) homoscedasticity, and (iii) independent data to be increasingly important in the stated order (Cochran, 1947; Box, 1954a,b; Gastwirth and Rubin, 1971; Glass et al., 1972; Lissitz and Chardos, 1975; Pettitt and Siskind, 1981).”
BackgroundMethodSwarts, A., Matsiliza-Mlathi, B., & Kleynhans, R. (2018) · South African Journal of Botany · doi:10.1016/j.sajb.2018.08.019 · Cited by 25
Who bets on sports? Some further empirical evidence using German data
Gassmann, F., Emrich, E., & Pierdzioch, C. (2015) · International Review for the Sociology of Sport · doi:10.1177/1012690215597650 · Cited by 25
“See Chimi and Russell (2009), Glass et al. (1972), Lubke and Muthen (2004) on the discussion of the treatment of ordinally scaled variables as metric variables.”
BackgroundA controlled experiment to evaluate the effects of mindfulness in software engineering
Bernárdez, B., Durán, A., Parejo, J. A., & Ruiz-Cortés, A. (2014) · International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement · doi:10.1145/2652524.2652539 · Cited by 27
“05, it was decided to carry out a mixed–model ANOVA in a similar way as with the effectiveness hypotheses tests, since most of the data was normal and the statistical test is robust [10].”
ResultUsing IRT Trait Estimates Versus Summated Scores in Predicting Outcomes
Xu, T., & Stone, C. A. (2011) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164411419846 · Cited by 25
“Researchers should be reassured that many types of analyses using summated scores are also robust to the assumption of interval data (e.g., Dowling & Midgley, 1991; Glass et al., 1972).”
Some Properties of Preliminary Tests of Equality of Variances in the Two-Sample Location Problem
Zimmerman, D. W. (1996) · The Journal of General Psychology · doi:10.1080/00221309.1996.9921274 · Cited by 25
McEvoy, P. M., & Nathan, P. R. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.20424 · Cited by 25
Typical object velocity influences motion extrapolation
Makin, A. D. J., Stewart, A. J., & Poliakoff, E. (2009) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-008-1678-0 · Cited by 25
“…the 18 colour–velocity conditions violated the normality assumption according to the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test (P = 0.167) with the exception of the green 20 deg/s condition (P = 0.014) and therefore ANOVA was used to explore the relationship between real and subjective velocity (Glass et al. 1972).”
MethodInfluentialMicrocomputers and continuing motivation
Seymour, S. L., Sullivan, H. J., Story, N. O., & Mosley, M. L. (1987) · ECTJ · doi:10.1007/bf02769449 · Cited by 25
Electromagnetic aftereffects of near-death experiences.
Nouri, F. M., & Holden, J. M. (2008) · The Journal of near-death studies · doi:10.17514/jnds-2008-27-2-p83-110 · Cited by 24
Cognitive function in short- and long-term substitution treatment: Are there differences?
Soyka, M., Zingg, C., Koller, G., & Hennig‐Fast, K. (2009) · The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/15622970902995604 · Cited by 26
Hill, A. T., McModie, S., Fung, W. K. W., Hoy, K. E., Chung, S. W., & Bertram, K. (2019) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2019.146506 · Cited by 25
Goal congruence: fitting international assignment into employee careers
Pattie, M. W., Benson, G. S., Casper, W. J., et al. (2013) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2012.744336 · Cited by 24
The interaction between duration, velocity and repetitive auditory stimulation
Makin, A. D. J., Poliakoff, E., Dillon, J., Perrin, A., Mullet, T., & Jones, L. A. (2012) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.01.013 · Cited by 25
Three months of slackline training elicit only task-specific improvements in balance performance
Giboin, L., Grüber, M., & Krämer, A. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0207542 · Cited by 24
The Effects of Proactive Release Behaviors During Human-Robot Handovers
Zhao, H., & Yanco, H. A. (2019) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1109/hri.2019.8673085 · Cited by 24
“In the past, ANOVA and the t test for the post-hoc pairwise comparisons have been shown to be relatively insensitive to moderate normality violation for the size of each sample over 30 [32], [33] and relatively insensitive to the homogeneity of variance assumption violation.”
MethodAnalyzing the consistency in within-activity learning patterns in blended learning
Sher, V., Hatala, M., & Gašević, D. (2020) · International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge · doi:10.1145/3375462.3375470 · Cited by 26
“order to do so, we used the ANOVA test due to their robustness to mild violations of normality [16], with cluster assignments as the”
MethodEnvironmental influence on urban rodent bait consumption
Patergnani, M., Mughini‐Gras, L., Poglayen, G., et al. (2010) · Journal of Pest Science · doi:10.1007/s10340-010-0304-7 · Cited by 24
“…distributions have clearly tested that both the t-test and the ANOVA are very robust to several kinds of deviations from normality (Boneau 1960; Glass et al. 1972; Harwell et al. 1992; Lix et al. 1996), before the proceeding of the t-test and the ANOVA, only the homogeneity of variances was…”
Genotoxic effects of silver nanoparticles on a tropical marine amphipod via feeding exposure
Botelho, M. T., Passos, M. J. D. A. C. R., Trevizani, T. H., et al. (2022) · Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2022.503527 · Cited by 23
ŞİMŞEK, A. S. (2023) · International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education · doi:10.21449/ijate.1183622 · Cited by 38
“For interval data, it is well known that the Student's t -test has better statistical power than the U-test in many cases when comparing means (Boneau, 1962; Glass et.al., 1972; Zimmerman & Zumbo, 1990; Bindak, 2014).”
MethodAlbaum, S. P., Hahne, H., Otto, A., Haußmann, U., Becher, D., Poetsch, A., Goesmann, A., & Nattkemper, T. W. (2011) · Proteome Science · doi:10.1186/1477-5956-9-30 · Cited by 23
“” [[53], p.”
Vrettou, M., Granholm, L., Todkar, A., Nilsson, K. W., Wallén‐Mackenzie, Å., Nylander, I., & Comasco, E. (2015) · Addiction Biology · doi:10.1111/adb.12331 · Cited by 26
Bowler, J. O., Bartholomew, K. J., Kellar, I., Mackintosh, B., Hoppitt, L., & Bayliss, A. P. (2016) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1002/ejp.908 · Cited by 23
“Indeed, there is suggestion that effortful attempts to control persistent pain (Eccleston and Crombez, 2007), and noxious attentional bias during ABM, can paradoxically prioritize the unwanted input (Grafton et al., 2014).”
BackgroundSoybean SDS in South Africa is Caused by Fusarium brasiliense and a Novel Undescribed Fusarium sp.
Tewoldemedhin, Y. T., Lamprecht, S. C., Vaughan, M. M., et al. (2016) · Plant Disease · doi:10.1094/pdis-05-16-0729-re · Cited by 23
Reporting practices and use of quantitative methods in Canadian journal articles in psychology.
Counsell, A., & Harlow, L. L. (2016) · Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne · doi:10.1037/cap0000074 · Cited by 23
“…parametric statistical tests with assumption violation has implications such as higher Type I or Type II error rates depending on the nature of the violations (Coombs, Algina, & Oltman, 1996; Cribbie, Fiksenbaum, Wilcox, & Keselman, 2012; Glass et al., 1972; Lix, Keselman, & Keselman, 1996).”
BackgroundLake, E. C., Smith, M. C., Dray, F. A., et al. (2015) · Biological Control · doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2014.12.021 · Cited by 23
“Violations of the assumption of normality in the ANOVA tests were disregarded if the residuals were normally distributed (Glass et al., 1972).”
MethodAn analysis of statistical power for parametric ancova and rank transform ancova
Olejnik, S. F., & Algina, J. J. (1987) · Communication in Statistics- Theory and Methods · doi:10.1080/03610928708829481 · Cited by 23
Student's Test and the Glasgow Coma Scale
Lucke, J. F. (1996) · Annals of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0196-0644(96)70006-9 · Cited by 23
Reply to Bi and Kuesten: ANOVA outperforms logistic regression for the analysis of CATA data
Meyners, M., & Hasted, A. M. (2021) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104339 · Cited by 23
Ramaekers, K. M., Caris, A., Moons, S., & van Gils, T. (2018) · European Transport Research Review · doi:10.1186/s12544-018-0333-5 · Cited by 21
“The F statistic controls the Type I error rate well under conditions of non-normality [30], especially when group sizes are equal.”
Benefits Are Limited with High Nitrogen Fertiliser Rates in Kikuyu-Ryegrass Pasture Systems
Viljoen, C., van der Colf, J., & Swanepoel, P. A. (2020) · Land · doi:10.3390/land9060173 · Cited by 22
“The means were separated using Fishers’ Protected Least Significant Difference (LSD) test, but only if the Bonferroni post-hoc test indicated significance at a 5% significance level [68,69].”
MethodPytlik, N., Soll, D., Hesse, K., Moritz, S., Bechdolf, A., Herrlich, J., Kircher, T. T. J., Klingberg, S., Landsberg, M. W., Müller, B. W., et al. (2020) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-020-02959-5 · Cited by 26
Hein, M., Goeken, N., Kurz, P., et al. (2021) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2021.05.056 · Cited by 22
Psychological and physiological evidence for an initial ‘Rough Sketch’ calculation of personal space
Tootell, R. B. H., Zapetis, S. L., Babadi, B., Nasiriavanaki, Z., Hughes, D., Mueser, K. T., Otto, M. W., Pace-Schott, E. F., & Holt, D. J. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-99578-1 · Cited by 22
Characterization of the busy-hour traffic of IP networks based on their intrinsic features
García‐Dorado, J. L., Hernández, J. A., Aracil, J., de Vergara, J. E. L., & López-Buedo, S. (2011) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2011.02.015 · Cited by 22
Winter, C., Acker, F. V., Bonduelle, M., Desmyttere, S., & Nekkebroeck, J. (2015) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dev036 · Cited by 22
“Although ANCOVA has been found to be relatively robust in terms of deviations from normality (e.g. Glass et al., 1972; Harwell et al., 1992; Lix et al., Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article-abstract/30/5/1122/589468 by guest on 26 July 2018 1996), we applied bootstrapping in…”
MethodMcCulloh, K. A., Petitmermet, J., Stefański, A., et al. (2016) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13323 · Cited by 22
“The conduit diameter data exhibited a slightly skewed distribution, but ANOVA tests are very robust to shifts in distribution (Glass et al., 1972), and our results did not differ when we compared log-transformed data.”
ResultReduced selective learning in patients with fibromyalgia vs healthy controls
Meulders, A., Boddez, Y., Blanco, F., Houte, M. V. D., & Vlaeyen, J. W. S. (2018) · Pain · doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001207 · Cited by 23
The Use of the Arc-Sine Transformation in the Analysis of Variance
Milligan, G. W. (1987) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316448704700303 · Cited by 22
Wightman, K. E., Ward, S. E., Haggar, J., et al. (2007) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2007.09.056 · Cited by 22
“Analysis of variance is relatively robust against departures from normality; of greater concern is heterogenous variance among experimental groups (Glass et al., 1972).”
BackgroundZimmerman, D. W., Williams, R. H., & Zurabo, B. D. (1993) · Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation · doi:10.1080/03610919308813123 · Cited by 22
Choosing a Two-Sample Location Test
Penfield, D. A. (1994) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.1994.9944139 · Cited by 22
Botha, S. S. C., Hoffman, L. C., & Britz, T. J. (2006) · Meat Science · doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.10.005 · Cited by 22
External referents and past outcomes as determinants of social discontent
Ross, M., & McMillen, M. J. (1973) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1031(73)80007-1 · Cited by 22
The impact of vision loss on attitudes toward autonomous vehicles: A vision‐centric analysis
Kuborn, A. M., & Hassan, S. E. (2024) · Optometry and Vision Science · doi:10.1097/opx.0000000000002145 · Cited by 21
Kverme, K. O., Haugland, G. T., Hannisdal, R., et al. (2019) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.734279 · Cited by 21
Blackford, J. U. (2006) · International review of research in mental retardation · doi:10.1016/s0074-7750(06)33005-4 · Cited by 21
Mafokoane, L. D., Zimmermann, H. G., & Hill, M. P. (2007) · African Entomology · doi:10.4001/1021-3589-15.2.295 · Cited by 21
“Glass et al. (1972) indicated that the consequences of inference after ANOVA are not serious, as no transformation could be found to rectify the problem.”
BackgroundExposure to parasites increases promiscuity in a freshwater snail
Soper, D. M., King, K. C., Vergara, D., et al. (2014) · Biology Letters · doi:10.1098/rsbl.2013.1091 · Cited by 21
“Owing to the large sample sizes used in the experiment, our tests were robust to the moderately skewed distribution of the residuals [24].”
MethodLiou, S., Tsai, H., & Cheng, C. (2012) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2834.2012.01447.x · Cited by 21
Comparison of In-Vehicle Auditory Public Traffic Information With Roadside Dynamic Message Signs
Ma, J., Smith, B. L., & Fontaine, M. D. (2015) · Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1080/15472450.2015.1062729 · Cited by 23
“Glass, Peckham, and Sanders (1972) did a well-known Monte Carlo study of ANOVA, and it showed that the F -test was incredibly robust to violations of the interval data assumption (as well as moderate skewing) and could be used to do statistical tests at the scale level of the data that was…”
MethodBernárdez, B., Durán, A., Parejo, J. A., & Ruiz–Cortés, A. (2016) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2016.06.104 · Cited by 20
de Bruin, W., van der Merwe, C., Kritzinger, Q., et al. (2016) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.11.020 · Cited by 21
Hart, A. G., Hesselberg, T., Nesbit, R., & Goodenough, A. E. (2017) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/ecog.03140 · Cited by 21
Pease, L. I., Clegg, P., Proctor, C. J., Shanley, D. P., Cockell, S., & Peffers, M. J. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-14650-z · Cited by 22
Richardson, M., Thar, J., Alvarez, J., Borchers, J., Ward, J., & Hamilton-Fletcher, G. (2019) · Perception · doi:10.1177/0301006619873194 · Cited by 22
Johnstone, S. J., Jiang, H., Sun, L., Rogers, J. M., Valderrama, J. T., & Zhang, D. (2020) · Clinical EEG and Neuroscience · doi:10.1177/1550059420946648 · Cited by 21
Association of fibroblast growth factor 21 with alcohol consumption and alcohol liver cirrhosis
Wagner‐Skacel, J., Horvath, A., Grande, P., Wenninger, J., Matzer, F., Fazekas, C., Mörkl, S., Meinitzer, A., & Stadlbauer, V. (2020) · Neuropsychiatrie · doi:10.1007/s40211-020-00380-8 · Cited by 21
Rating knockdown of flour beetles after exposure to two insecticides as an indicator of mortality
Athanassiou, C. G., Kavallieratos, N. G., Arthur, F. H., et al. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-78982-z · Cited by 21
Controlling the Type I error rate by using the nonparametric bootstrap when comparing means
Frutos, I. P. (2013) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1111/bmsp.12011 · Cited by 21
Zimmerman, D. W., & Zumbo, B. D. (1990) · The Journal of General Psychology · doi:10.1080/00221309.1990.9921148 · Cited by 21
Assessing the Accuracy of Soil and Water Quality Characterization Using Remote Sensing
Obade, V. D. P., Lal, R., & Moore, R. (2014) · Water Resources Management · doi:10.1007/s11269-014-0796-7 · Cited by 21
“Other than being a linear model, ANOVA assumes the following to hold true: (i) the independence of observations, (ii) normally distributed variables and (iii) homogeneity of variance (Bentler and Dudgeon 1996; Glass et al. 1972; Hothorn and Everitt 2006).”
BackgroundEffect of Outliers on the Relative Power of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Tests
Zimmerman, D. W., & Zumbo, B. D. (1990) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.1990.71.1.339 · Cited by 21
Mitral annuloplasty ring suture forces: Impact of surgeon, ring, and use conditions
Pierce, E. L., Bloodworth, C. H., Siefert, A. W., et al. (2017) · Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.06.036 · Cited by 21
Fokides, E. (2017) · Journal of Information Technology Education Research · doi:10.28945/3893 · Cited by 23
Pyke, A. A., Rovira, E. M., Murray, S., Pritts, J., Carp, C. L., & Thomson, R. (2021) · Cyberpsychology Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace · doi:10.5817/cp2021-4-9 · Cited by 23
“Although ANOVAs have been considered robust to normality violations (Glass et al., 1972), since our Likert scale response measures were not always normally distributed, we also checked and confirmed all our main effects for those measures using non-parametric Friedman Tests (for the 3-level attack…”
MethodDeng, M., Wang, X., & Menassa, C. C. (2022) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109346 · Cited by 20
Walsh, C. R., & Rissman, J. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-42770-w · Cited by 21
“Tests of normality are not reported given that t-tests, ANOVAs and linear mixed models are generally robust to violations of normality, especially with larger sample sizes 71,72 .”
Quantifying the familiarization period for maximal resistive exercise
Green, L. A., Parro, J. J., & Gabriel, D. A. (2013) · Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism · doi:10.1139/apnm-2013-0253 · Cited by 20
Empirical Findings on Motor Insurance Pricing in Germany, Austria and Switzerland
Laas, D., Schmeiser, H., & Wagner, J. (2016) · The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Issues and Practice · doi:10.1057/gpp.2015.30 · Cited by 20
“An integrated model with three premium components is considered by Guelman et al. (2014). They suggest the use of personalized treatment models in order to determine pricing and select customers that should be addressed by a marketing strategy, such as price adjustments to increase cross-selling. Methods to identify p…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCupples, B., O’Connor, D., & Cobley, S. P. (2018) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/02640414.2018.1469227 · Cited by 20
Ojrzyńska, H., Bilińska, D., Werner, M., et al. (2020) · Aerobiologia · doi:10.1007/s10453-020-09629-9 · Cited by 20
“According to Glass et al. (1972) and Lix et al. (1996), ANOVA is not very sensitive to moderate deviations from normality.”
BackgroundCognitive function in short- and long-term substitution treatment: Are there differences?
Soyka, M., Zingg, C., Koller, G., et al. (2010) · The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.3109/15622970902995604 · Cited by 20
“If the distribution of data was skewed in both treatment groups, violations of the assumption of normal distribution were tolerated (Glass et al. 1972).”
BackgroundZimmerman, D. W. (2006) · Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1016/j.stamet.2005.10.002 · Cited by 20
Cloete, S. W. P., Gilmour, A. R., Olivier, J. J., & van Wyk, J. B. (2003) · South African Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.4314/sajas.v33i1.3737 · Cited by 20
“Interpretation of results was thus continued (Glass et al., 1972).”
The Relationship Between Target Quality and Interference in Sound Zone
Baykaner, K., Coleman, P. J. C., Mason, R., et al. (2015) · Journal of the Audio Engineering Society · doi:10.17743/jaes.2015.0007 · Cited by 20
“001 [28], analyses of variance (ANOVAs) were conducted and are discussed in the following sub-sections.”
MethodMary, F. L., & Martin, R. C. (1998) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/713755790 · Cited by 20
“As reported by Glass et al. (1972), data from Lunney (1970) suggest the robustness of the F-statistic even when the dependent variable is dichotomous (see also Cochran, 1950). showed some indication of an advantage on trials where words were split at the onset± body boundary, this difference…”
ResultZimmermann, G., Pauly, M., & Bathke, A. C. (2019) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/0962280218817796 · Cited by 19
“It has been shown in simulation studies that the violation of one or more of these assumptions can seriously affect the ANCOVA F test in terms of maintenance of the prespecified type I error level and power (Glass et al., 1972; Huitema, 2011).”
BackgroundStatistical methods and models based on quality of experience distributions
Seufert, M. (2020) · Quality and User Experience · doi:10.1007/s41233-020-00044-z · Cited by 19
Does Critical Thinking Enhance EFL Learners‘ Receptive Skills?
Hashemi, M. R., & Zabihi, R. (2012) · Journal of Language Teaching and Research · doi:10.4304/jltr.3.1.172-179 · Cited by 19
The paradoxical image of consultant expertise: a rhetorical deconstruction
Bouwmeester, O., & Stiekema, J. (2015) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-11-2014-0653 · Cited by 19
“While in some cases the data lacked homogeneity, we still choose to conduct ANOVA tests because ANOVA remains a robust test for such unequal variances (Glass et al., 1972; Lix et al., 1996).”
MethodTunnah, L., Mackellar, S. R. C., Barnett, D. A., et al. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.139964 · Cited by 19
“Non-parametric tests were unsuitable for our repeated experimental design; thus, consulting Glass et al. (1972), who stated that many parametric tests are not affected by violation of assumptions, we proceeded with parametric methods.”
MethodPysanenko, K., Bureš, Z., Lindovský, J., & Syka, J. (2017) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.11.049 · Cited by 19
“Normality of distributions was not tested: as the sample sizes were sufficiently large in all cases, possible nonnormality of distributions would not affect robustness of the t-tests and ANOVA test (Glass et al., 1972).”
A Reassessment of ANOVA Reporting Practices: A Review of Three APA Journals
Skidmore, S. T., & Zhou, Y. (2018) · Journal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences · doi:10.2458/v8i1.22019 · Cited by 19
“A practical question for researchers then is “whether the plausible violations of the assumptions have serious consequences on the validity of probability statements [and estimates of effect sizes] based on the standard assumptions” (Glass et al., 1972, p. 237).”
BackgroundReal exchange rate persistence and country characteristics: A global analysis
Curran, M., & Velic, A. (2019) · Journal of International Money and Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jimonfin.2019.06.001 · Cited by 19
Effects of exercising before breakfast on the health of T2DM patients—A randomized controlled trial
Brinkmann, C. K., Weh‐Gray, O., Brixius, K., Bloch, W., Predel, H., & Kreutz, T. (2019) · Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports · doi:10.1111/sms.13543 · Cited by 19
Cyber Resilience Progression Model
Carías, J. F., Arrizabalaga, S., Labaka, L., & Hernantes, J. (2020) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app10217393 · Cited by 20
Atkinson, M. B., & Bretz, S. L. (2021) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c01419 · Cited by 21
The organizational principles of de-differentiated topographic maps in somatosensory cortex
Liu, P., Chrysidou, A., Doehler, J., Hebart, M. N., Wolbers, T., & Kuehn, E. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.60090 · Cited by 17
“Robust ANOVAs were calculated if the distribution of values in the non-normality distributed data was skewed, ANOVAs were calculated if the data were normally distributed, or if only sub-groups of the data were not normally distributed (Glass et al., 1972; Harwell et al., 1992; Lix et al., 1996).”
Rizzo, J. A., Liu, N. T., Coates, E. C., et al. (2021) · Journal of Burn Care & Research · doi:10.1093/jbcr/irab182 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Glass, G. V., Peckham, P. D., & Sanders, J. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Colorado System (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- Indiana University (US)
- ORCID
- Glass, Gene V
- Venue
- Review of Educational Research
- Published
- 1972-09
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 237-288
- ISSN
- 0034-6543 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-1046
- OpenAlex
- W2120106329
- Semantic Scholar
- 96cd4ca99a137bf80e8c2dc5cb20ab6782df819e
- Cited by
- 1,826
- References
- 95
- Citations by year
- 2026: 91 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 72 · 2021: 98 · 2020: 85 · 2019: 96 · 2018: 137 · 2017: 100 · 2016: 106 · 2015: 74 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 70 · 2012: 69
- FWCI
- 10.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Review of Educational Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
- Keywords
- covariance analysis, assumption violations, type I error, type II error, nonparametric statistics, Wilcoxon test, Mann-Whitney test, Kruskal-Wallis test, Friedman test, social science research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review