The DOI matches its Crossref record; 93 of the 95 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consequences of Failure to Meet Assumptions Underlying the Fixed Effects Analyses of Variance and Covariance
Abstract
The effects of violating the assumptions underlying the fixed-effects analyses of variance (ANOVA) and covariance (ANCOVA) on Type-I and Type-II error rates have been of great concern to researchers and statisticians. The major effects of violation of assumptions are now well known, after nearly four decades of research. Early summaries and reviews by Hey (1938), Garret and Zubin (1943), Grant (1944), and Gourlay (1955) and more recent reviews by Bradley (1963), Atiqullah (1967), Elashoff (1969) and Scheffe (1959, Ch. 10) can be extended and updated with recent research which provides closure to an area of active inquiry. (For a review of the effects of violation of the assumptions of the randomeffects ANOVA-a subject not reviewed here-the reader is directed to Scheffe, 1959, pp. 334-337 and Box & Anderson, 1962.) Asking whether ANOVA and ANCOVA assumptions are satisfied is not idle curiosity. The assumptions of most mathematical models are always false to a greater or lesser extent. The relevant question is not whether ANOVA assumptions are met exactly, but rather whether the plausible violations of the assumptions have serious consequences on the validity of probability statements based on the standard assumptions. Applied statistics in education and the social sciences experienced a largely unnecessary hegira to non-parametric statistics during the 1950s. Increasingly during the 1950s and early 1960s the fixed-effects, normal theory ANOVA was replaced by such comparable no…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We focus on fairly drastic non-normality because only little bias can be expected from minor violations (Bishara & Hittner, 2012; Glass et al., 1972; Hack, 1958; Puth et al., 2014).”
From Violating the normality assumption may be the lesser of two evils (2021) · cites this paper as Glass et al., 1972
In the citing paper
“For instance, when applying a t test that assumes equal variances in both groups to data that come from substantially different variances (e.g., σ12/ σ22 = 0.1), then high rates of type I errors (e.g., 23%) may be obtained in a situation where sample sizes are unbalanced (N1 = 15, N2 = 5), namely when the small sample comes from the more variable group (Glass et al., 1972; Miller, 1986).”
From Violating the normality assumption may be the lesser of two evils (2021) · cites this paper as Glass et al., 1972
In the citing paper
“Violating this assumption may result in more notable increases of type I errors (compared to what we examined here) at least when the violations are drastic.”
From Violating the normality assumption may be the lesser of two evils (2021) · cites this paper as Glass et al., 1972
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences
Guitton, H., & Siegel, S. (1958) · Revue économique · doi:10.2307/3498751 · Cited by 35,279
Statistical principles in experimental design.
Winer, B. J. (1962) · McGraw-Hill Book Company · doi:10.1037/11774-000 · Cited by 27,137
Principles and Procedures of Statistics
Robinson, H. F. (1961) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj1961.00021962005300050002x · Cited by 17,727
An Analysis of Transformations
Box, G. E. P., & Cox, D. R. (1964) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1964.tb00553.x · Cited by 15,287
Statistical Methods for Research Workers
Fisher, R. A. (1945) · American Journal of Clinical Pathology · doi:10.1093/ajcp/15.11.552b · Cited by 10,883
Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences
McGinn, L. C. (1957) · Journal of the Franklin Institute · doi:10.1016/0016-0032(57)90766-4 · Cited by 7,284
Journal of The American Statistical Association
Fienberg, S. E. (2004) · Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences · doi:10.1002/0471667196.ess1317 · Cited by 6,289
Scheffé, H. (1960) · Soil Science · doi:10.1097/00010694-196006000-00016 · Cited by 5,625
On Methods in the Analysis of Profile Data
Greenhouse, S. W., & Geisser, S. (1959) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02289823 · Cited by 4,946
THE GENERALIZATION OF ‘STUDENT'S’ PROBLEM WHEN SEVERAL DIFFERENT POPULATION VARLANCES ARE INVOLVED
WELCH, B. L. (1947) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/34.1-2.28 · Cited by 4,135
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 95 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- Atiqullah M, 1967, Bulletin of the Institute of Statistical Research and Training, 1, 77
- Behrens WU, 1929, Landweise Jahresbuch, 68, 807
- Gayen AK, 1949, Biometrika, 36, 353
- Glass GV, 1970, Statistical methods in education and psychology
- Horsnell G, 1953, Biometrika, 40, 28
- KohrRLA comparison of statistical procedures for testing μ 1 = μ 2 with unequal n ’s and variances1970Pennsylvania State UniversityDoctoral dissertation
- Lindquist EF, 1953, Design and analysis of experiments in education and psychology
- Lunney GH, 1969, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association
- Mandeville GK, 1969, A Monte Carlo investigation of the adequacy of standard analysis of variance test procedures for dependent binary variates
- Pitman EJG, 1937, Biometrika, 29, 322
- Porter AC, 1967, The effects of using fallible variables in the analysis of covariance, Ph.D
- Pratt JW, 1964, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 59, 665
- Quesnel CE, 1947, Skandanavian Aktuarietids, 30, 44
- van der Vaart HR, 1961, Quantative methods in pharmacology, 140
- Welch BL, 1947, Biometrika, 34, 28
- 10.2466/pms.1963.16.2.588 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 999
Fantuzzo, J. W., Rouse, H. L., McDermott, P. A., Sekino, Y., Childs, S., & Weiss, A. (2005) · School Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/02796015.2005.12088018 · Cited by 66
“The analysis of covariance provides increased precision by statistically controlling the sources of variation not directly manipulated by the experimenter ( Glass, Peckham, & Saunders, 1972 ).”
BackgroundComparisons of the Mann-Whitney, Student’st, and AlternatetTests for Means of Normal Distributions
Gibbons, J. D., & Chakraborti, S. (1991) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.1991.10806565 · Cited by 66
Chatterjee, D., Shams, S., & Gerlai, R. T. (2013) · Amino Acids · doi:10.1007/s00726-013-1658-y · Cited by 66
“…ig n ifi ca n t re su lt s known to be fairly insensitive to the violation of the variance homogeneity and normal distribution criteria especially when sample sizes of the analyzed groups are similar, i.e., differ by a ratio less than two to one (Pagano 1990; May et al. 1989; Glass et al. 1972).”
BackgroundMultivariate Approaches in Ecology: The Assessment of Ecologic Similarity
Green, R. H. (1980) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.11.110180.000245 · Cited by 66
Violating the normality assumption may be the lesser of two evilsPreprint
Knief, U., & Forstmeier, W. (2018) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/498931 · Cited by 67
Rondon, A. T., Hilton, D. C., Jarrett, M. A., & Ollendick, T. H. (2020) · Journal of Attention Disorders · doi:10.1177/1087054718756197 · Cited by 66
Rooney, B., & Hennessy, E. (2013) · Media Psychology · doi:10.1080/15213269.2013.838905 · Cited by 65
Impact of Hearing Aid Technology on Outcomes in Daily Life I: The Patients’ Perspective
Cox, R. M., Johnson, J. A., & Xu, J. (2016) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0000000000000277 · Cited by 67
“Some of the distributions deviated from normality; however, it has been shown that ANOVA is quite robust to violations of normality for groups of moderate size (Donaldson 1968; Glass et al. 1972).”
Parametric tests for Likert scale: For and against
Wadgave, U., & Khairnar, M. (2016) · Asian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.ajp.2016.08.016 · Cited by 65
SULLIVAN, L. M., & D’Agostino, R. B. (2003) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1433 · Cited by 64
Kozlowski, A. M., & Matson, J. L. (2011) · Research in Autism · doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2011.06.005 · Cited by 63
Adriaens, K., Gucht, D. V., & Baeyens, F. (2018) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph15122902 · Cited by 64
“Normality was violated for some individual variables but due to the fact that group sizes were equal (within-subjects design), we decided to still conduct ANOVAs (because of the robustness of the statistic against violations of normality with equal sample sizes) [70].”
Methodvan Gils, T., Caris, A., Ramaekers, K. M., Braekers, K., & de Koster, R. B. M. (2019) · Transportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2019.02.010 · Cited by 64
Kratochwill, T. R., Alden, K., Demuth, D., et al. (1974) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1974.7-629 · Cited by 64
Analysis of repeated measurements in physical therapy research
Atkinson, G. (2001) · Physical Therapy in Sport · doi:10.1054/ptsp.2001.0071 · Cited by 64
Choosing Between Parametric and Nonparametric Tests
Harwell, M. R. (1988) · Journal of Counseling & Development · doi:10.1002/j.1556-6676.1988.tb02007.x · Cited by 63
The Direct and Indirect Effects of Inadmissible Evidence1
Carretta, T. R., & Moreland, R. L. (1983) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1983.tb01741.x · Cited by 63
Does the host match the content? A taxonomical update on online consumption communities
Breitsohl, J., Kunz, W. H., & Dowell, D. J. (2015) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1080/0267257x.2015.1036102 · Cited by 65
Summarizing Monte Carlo Results in Methodological Research
Harwell, M. R. (1992) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.3102/10769986017004297 · Cited by 62
Makhaye, G., Aremu, A. O., Gerrano, A. S., et al. (2021) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants10071327 · Cited by 61
“[42] also indicated that the consequences on inference after ANOVA are not serious.”
BackgroundTeachers’ perceptions of factors affecting the educational use of ICT in technology-rich classrooms
Badia, A., Meneses, J., & Sigalés, C. (2013) · Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology · doi:10.14204/ejrep.31.13053 · Cited by 66
Implementation of sustainable public procurement practices and policies: A sorting framework
Prier, E., Schwerin, E., & McCue, C. P. (2016) · Journal of Public Procurement · doi:10.1108/jopp-16-03-2016-b004 · Cited by 61
Hattenschwiler, N., Sterchi, Y., Mendes, M., & Schwaninger, A. (2018) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2018.05.003 · Cited by 54
Gerphagnon, M., Agha, R., Martin‐Creuzburg, D., Bec, A., Pérrière, F., Rad‐Menéndez, C., Gachon, C. M. M., & Wolinska, J. (2018) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/1462-2920.14489 · Cited by 61
Hasnain, S., Shuter, B. J., & Minns, C. K. (2013) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/cjfas-2012-0217 · Cited by 60
Clare, L., Nelis, S. M., Jones, I. R., Hindle, J. V., Thom, J. M., Nixon, J., Cooney, J., Jones, C. L., Edwards, R. T., & Whitaker, C. J. (2015) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-015-0402-4 · Cited by 65
“ANCOVA analyses are generally robust to moderate violations of this assumption as long as the sample sizes in each group is approximately equal [56], as was the case for GSES and total cholesterol.”
MethodStapleton, J. L., Turrisi, R., Hillhouse, J., Robinson, J. K., & Abar, B. W. (2010) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-009-9246-z · Cited by 60
“…chose to use multiple comparisons over alternative approaches (e.g., ANOVA) because the subgroups found in an LPA often have unequal numbers of individuals and disproportionate variances between subgroups which can lead to unpredictable changes in type 1 error rates with ANOVA (Glass et al. 1972).”
MethodInfluentialThe Unit of Analysis in Field Research: Issues and Approaches to Design and Data Analysis
Silverman, S., & Solmon, M. A. (1998) · Journal of Teaching in Physical Education · doi:10.1123/jtpe.17.3.270 · Cited by 60
Rubio‐Aparicio, M., Sánchez‐Meca, J., López‐López, J. A., Botella, J., & Marín‐Martínez, F. (2017) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1111/bmsp.12092 · Cited by 56
“Note that the performance of the QB(P) test was similar to that expected for the F test in a typical ANOVA with unbalanced sample sizes, when the homoscedasticity assumption was not met (Glass et al., 1972; Hinkle et al., 2003).”
ResultEffect of non‐normality on test statistics for one‐way independent groups designs
Cribbie, R. A., Fıksenbaum, L., Keselman, H. J., & Wilcox, R. R. (2011) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.2011.02014.x · Cited by 59
Paynter, J. M., Davies, M., & Beamish, W. (2017) · Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability · doi:10.3109/13668250.2017.1293235 · Cited by 70
Understanding the Practical Advantages of Modern ANOVA Methods
Wilcox, R. R. (2002) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15374424jccp3103_12 · Cited by 59
“Glass, Peckham, and Sanders (1972) appear to be the first to realize that there are practical problems, and many articles have since confirmed that unequal variances can result in poor control over the probability of a Type I error.”
BackgroundNeuronal activity is not required for the initial formation and maturation of visual selectivity
Hagihara, K. M., Murakami, T., Yoshida, T., Tagawa, Y., & Ohki, K. (2015) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4155 · Cited by 58
Sung, Y., Lee, H.-Y., Yang, J.-M., & Chang, K.-E. (2019) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2019.05.001 · Cited by 64
The analysis of repeated measurements: A quantitative research synthesis
Keselman, J. C., Lix, L. M., & Keselman, H. J. (1996) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1996.tb01089.x · Cited by 58
Emotional Processing and Brain Activity in Youth at High Risk for Alcoholism
Cservenka, A., Fair, D. A., & Nagel, B. J. (2014) · Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/acer.12435 · Cited by 67
“Since analysis of variance (ANOVA) is considered to be robust to violations of normality (Glass et al., 1972), a 2x7 mixed model 44 ANOVA was used to examine emotion recognition accuracy and reaction time on the ERT, in which family history status was the between-subjects factor, and emotional…”
MethodPublic Cellphone Use Does Not Activate Negative Responses in Others…Unless They Hate Cellphones
Gonzales, A. L., & Wu, Y. (2016) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/jcc4.12174 · Cited by 56
Schindler, R. J., & Robert, A. (2005) · Sedimentology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3091.2005.00706.x · Cited by 57
“…information was only used in subsequent post hoc analysis because: (i) anova is robust, operating well even with considerable heterogeneity of variances, assuming sample sizes are approximately equal (Glass et al., 1972); and (ii) no suitable non-parametric alternative exists (Zar, 1984, p. 231).”
MethodValentine, S. R., Nam, S., Hollingworth, D., & Hall, C. (2013) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1879-8 · Cited by 56
Acutis, M., Scaglia, B., & Confalonieri, R. (2012) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2012.06.006 · Cited by 56
Johnson, J. A., Xu, J., & Cox, R. M. (2016) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0000000000000327 · Cited by 58
“Furthermore, because ANOVA is robust against deviations from normality (e.g., Donaldson 1968; Glass et al. 1972), we felt that any transformation would have been minor in effect at best.”
BackgroundSampling Errors of Variance Components in Small Sample Multifacet Generalizability Studies
Smith, P. L. (1978) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.3102/10769986003004319 · Cited by 56
Dures, S. G., & Cumming, G. S. (2010) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.12.019 · Cited by 55
“In addition to the spatial aspects of fragmentation, the temporal aspect of relaxation must be considered (Gonzalez, 2000).”
BackgroundData analysis techniques in service quality literature: Essentials and advances
Mohammed, K., & Adil, M. (2013) · Serbian Journal of Management · doi:10.5937/sjm8-3469 · Cited by 58
“The assumption of homogeneity of variances is essential when comparing two groups, because if variances are unequal, the validity of the results can get jeopardized i.e. increases Type I error leading to invalid inferences (Glass et al., 1972; Nordstokke et al., 2011).”
BackgroundHess, B. J., Olejnik, S., & Huberty, C. J. (2001) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/00131640121971572 · Cited by 46
Career Patterns of Supply Chain Executives: An Optimal Matching Analysis
Flöthmann, C., & Hoberg, K. (2017) · Journal of Business Logistics · doi:10.1111/jbl.12150 · Cited by 55
Chemosensory sensitivity reflects reproductive status in the ant Harpegnathos saltator
Ghaninia, M., Haight, K. L., Berger, S. L., et al. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-03964-7 · Cited by 55
Nelson, J. M., & Liebel, S. W. (2017) · Journal of American College Health · doi:10.1080/07448481.2017.1382499 · Cited by 68
Hendry, D. T., & Hodges, N. J. (2018) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.01.009 · Cited by 56
Data transformations, power, and skew: A rebuttal to Levine and Dunlap.
Games, P. A. (1984) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.95.2.345 · Cited by 55
Sublethal effects of zinc and municipal effluents on larvae of the red abalone Haliotis rufescens
Hunt, J. W., & Anderson, B. S. (1989) · Marine Biology · doi:10.1007/bf00541657 · Cited by 55
The Impact of Context and Word Type on Students' Maze Task Accuracy
January, S. A., & Ardoin, S. P. (2012) · School Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/02796015.2012.12087508 · Cited by 54
Macdonald, S., Mann, R. E., Chipman, M. L., et al. (2003) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2003.07.004 · Cited by 54
Effects of internal phosphorus loading on nutrient limitation in a eutrophic reservoir
Nikolai, S. J., & Dzialowski, A. R. (2014) · Limnologica · doi:10.1016/j.limno.2014.08.005 · Cited by 57
The Effects of Immersion and Real-World Distractions on Virtual Social Interactions
Oh, C. S., Herrera, F., & Bailenson, J. N. (2019) · Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2018.0404 · Cited by 57
“Although there is an on-going debate regarding the robustness of analysis of variance in cases of normality assumption violations and Likert-type scales, 37–39 we report the results of the nonparametric aligned rank transform analyses of variance, as it is the more conservative method.”
A Guide to Nature Immersion: Psychological and Physiological Benefits
Lim, P. Y., Dillon, D., & Chew, P. K. H. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17165989 · Cited by 66
“However, research has suggested that ANOVA is robust against violations of normality, and thus the analysis proceeded despite the violation [83,84].”
Mathis, F., Vaniea, K. E., & Khamis, M. (2021) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445478 · Cited by 53
“We applied ANOVAs to parametric and normal/near-normal distributed data as ANOVAs are robust to deviations from normality [32].”
MethodHamilton, B. L. (1977) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316447703700313 · Cited by 54
“The generation of the slopes within each treatment group was accomplished by means of a procedure used by Knapp and Swoyer (1967), involving the following theorem: &dquo;Let X and W be two independent random normal variables with zero mean and unit variance.”
Body Site Variation of Cool Perception Thresholds, with Observations on Paradoxical Heat
Greenspan, J. D., Taylor, D. J., & McGillis, S. L. B. (1993) · Somatosensory & Motor Research · doi:10.3109/08990229309028851 · Cited by 54
Long‐range temporal correlations in the subthalamic nucleus of patients with Parkinson’s disease
Hohlefeld, F. U., Huebl, J., Huchzermeyer, C., Schneider, G., Schönecker, T., Kühn, A. A., Curio, G., & Nikulin, V. V. (2012) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.08198.x · Cited by 54
“These prerequisites justified parametric testing in the case of the scaling exponents, together with the observed robustness of the F-test to slight deviations from basic assumptions (e.g. normal distribution; Glass et al., 1972; Lindman, 1974).”
Hendry, D. T., WILLIAMS, A. M., & Hodges, N. J. (2018) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/02640414.2018.1432236 · Cited by 53
Comparing oral health in patients with different levels of dental anxiety
Zinke, A., Hannig, C., & Berth, H. (2018) · Head & Face Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13005-018-0182-4 · Cited by 53
Hill, A. T., Rogasch, N. C., Fitzgerald, P. B., & Hoy, K. E. (2018) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2018.11.022 · Cited by 51
Investigating Smartphone-based Pan and Zoom in 3D Data Spaces in Augmented Reality
Büschel, W., Mitschick, A., Meyer, T. A., et al. (2019) · International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI) · doi:10.1145/3338286.3340113 · Cited by 53
“, [23]) and because ANOVAs on log-transformed data showed the same general trends.”
BackgroundMeasurement and statistics: An examination of construct validity.
Maxwell, S. E., & Delaney, H. D. (1985) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.97.1.85 · Cited by 53
Gosse, C. S., McGinty, A. S., Mashburn, A. J., Hoffman, L. M., & Pianta, R. C. (2013) · Early Education and Development · doi:10.1080/10409289.2013.778567 · Cited by 59
“However, linear regression is robust to assumptions of normality (Glass et al., 1972; Ito, 1980).”
BackgroundThe Role of Trust in Proactive Conversational Assistants
Kraus, M., Wagner, N., Callejas, Z., & Minker, W. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3103893 · Cited by 56
“However, the F-statistic of an ANOVA can be robust to violations of assumptions, as long as the group sizes are equal [74].”
MethodLeisure attitudes: A comparison between Chinese in Canada and Anglo‐Canadians
Deng, J., Walker, G. J., & Swinnerton, G. S. (2005) · Leisure/Loisir · doi:10.1080/14927713.2005.9651331 · Cited by 52
Service-Learning as a Catalyst for Community Development
Geller, J. D., Zuckerman, N., & Seidel, A. (2014) · Education and Urban Society · doi:10.1177/0013124513514773 · Cited by 52
Dental microwear texture analysis of Homo sapiens sapiens: Foragers, farmers, and pastoralists
Schmidt, C. W., Remy, A., Sessen, R. V., Willman, J. C., Krueger, K. L., Scott, R. M., Mahoney, P., Beach, J. J., McKinley, J. I., D’Anastasio, R., et al. (2019) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.23815 · Cited by 52
Zimmerman, D. W., & Zumbo, B. D. (1992) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.1992.74.3.835 · Cited by 51
The Problem of Multiple Inference in Psychiatric Research
Hall, W., & Bird, K. D. (1985) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.3109/00048678509158831 · Cited by 52
Concerning Trends in Likert Scale Usage in Human-robot Interaction: Towards Improving Best Practices
Schrum, M., Ghuy, M., Hedlund-Botti, E., Natarajan, M., Johnson, M., & Gombolay, M. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3572784 · Cited by 51
ISSUES IN BIOMEDICAL STATISTICS: STATISTICAL INFERENCE
Ludbrook, J., & Dudley, H. A. F. (1994) · Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1111/j.1445-2197.1994.tb02308.x · Cited by 51
Winne, C. T., & Keck, M. B. (2004) · Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A Molecular & Integrative Physiology · doi:10.1016/j.cbpb.2004.11.009 · Cited by 51
Yeates, P., O'Neill, P. A., Mann, K. V., & Eva, K. W. (2012) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2012.36515 · Cited by 51
The role of process information in narrations while learning with animations and static pictures
Stebner, F., Kühl, T., Höffler, T. N., Wirth, J., & Ayres, P. (2016) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.001 · Cited by 51
“However, ANOVAs are considered as fairly robust against violations of normality (Glass et al., 1972).”
BackgroundBorn, F., Abramowski, S., & Masuch, M. (2019) · International Conference on Virtual Worlds and Games for Serious Applications (VS-Games) · doi:10.1109/vs-games.2019.8864579 · Cited by 55
Processing Social Information in Messages
Slater, M. D. (1990) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365090017003003 · Cited by 51
Power-Cost Efficiency of Eight Macrobenthic Sampling Schemes in Puget Sound, Washington, USA
Ferraro, S. P., Cole, F. A., Deben, W. A., et al. (1989) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/f89-267 · Cited by 51
Statistical treatment of endogonaceous spore counts
John, T. V. S., & Koske, R. E. (1988) · Transactions of the British Mycological Society · doi:10.1016/s0007-1536(88)80012-3 · Cited by 51
Power shift and connectivity changes in healthy aging during resting-state EEG
Perinelli, A., Assecondi, S., Tagliabue, C. F., & Mazza, V. (2022) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119247 · Cited by 54
Variance Stabilizing Transformations and the Power of the F Test
Budescu, D. V., & Appelbaum, M. I. (1981) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.3102/10769986006001055 · Cited by 50
Myers, S. G., & Adrian Wells, A. (2013) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2013.01.007 · Cited by 50
Imazalil residue loading and green mould control in citrus packhouses
Erasmus, A., Lennox, C. L., Jordaan, H., Smilanick, J. L., Lesar, K., & Fourie, P. H. (2011) · Postharvest Biology and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.postharvbio.2011.05.006 · Cited by 50
“In cases where non-normalitywas due to high kurtosis, analysiswas conducted on percentages (Glass et al., 1972).”
MethodLight Stress Responses by the Eelgrass, Zostera marina (L)
Bertelli, C. M., & Unsworth, R. K. F. (2018) · Frontiers in Environmental Science · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2018.00039 · Cited by 50
“ANOVA was still performed due to the robust nature of the test and the relative insensitivity of the F test to departures from normality (Glass et al., 1972; Lix et al., 1996; McDonald, 2014).”
MethodHyaluronic acid as a macromolecular crowding agent for production of cell-derived matrices
Shendi, D., Marzi, J., Linthicum, W., Rickards, A. J., Dolivo, D., Keller, S., Kauss, M. A., Wen, Q., McDevitt, T. C., Dominko, T., et al. (2019) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2019.09.042 · Cited by 50
Salivary cortisol, stress and mood in healthy older adults: The Zenith study
Simpson, E. E. A., McConville, C. F., Rae, G., O’Connor, J. M., Stewart-Knox, B. J., Coudray, C., & Strain, J. (2008) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.12.001 · Cited by 50
Inbreeding depression in fecundity and inbred line extinction in the bulb mite, Rhizoglyphus robini
Radwan, J. (2003) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800254 · Cited by 50
“This was analysed using standard ANOVA, as it is robust against moderate departures from heteroscedasticity (Glass et al, 1972), and Bartlett’s test did not detect significant heterogeneity of variances in the data (P¼ 0.84).”
InfluentialPractice mode and learner control in computer-based instruction
Pollock, J., & Sullivan, H. J. (1990) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/0361-476x(90)90022-s · Cited by 50
Yamasaki, M., Fukaya, M., Yamazaki, M., Azechi, H., Natsume, R., Abe, M., Sakimura, K., & Watanabe, M. (2016) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4178-15.2016 · Cited by 43
“For further assessment of the relationship among synapse type, PSD size, and AMPAR, labeling density was performed with a twoway ANOVA, which is generally robust to moderate deviations from normality (Glass et al., 1972).”
MethodThe formation of group norms in computer-mediated communication
Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Lea, M. (2000) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1093/hcr/26.3.341 · Cited by 557
On the Use of Likert-Type Scales in Multilevel Data
Beal, D. J., & Dawson, J. (2007) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428106295492 · Cited by 49
Manoonpong, P., Petersen, D. S., Kovalev, A. E., Wörgötter, F., Gorb, S. N., Spinner, M., & Heepe, L. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep39455 · Cited by 49
Σαμαράς, Α., Dimitroglou, A., Kollias, S., Skouradakis, G., Papadakis, I. E., & Pavlidis, M. A. (2021) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.737257 · Cited by 49
Tewoldemedhin, Y. T., Lamprecht, S. C., McLeod, A., et al. (2006) · Plant Disease · doi:10.1094/pd-90-1399 · Cited by 49
Blair, R. C. (1981) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.2307/1170363 · Cited by 49
O’Bryhim, J. R., Adams, D. H., Spaet, J. L. Y., et al. (2017) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2017.01.029 · Cited by 48
“However, ANOVA is fairly robust to violations of a single assumption, especially if sample sizes are relatively large (Glass et al., 1972).”
BackgroundThe Effect of Visual, Spatial and Temporal Manipulations on Embodiment and Action
Ratcliffe, N., & Newport, R. (2017) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2017.00227 · Cited by 49
“Furthermore, a number of stimulation studies have concluded that ANOVA is ‘‘robust’’ to deviations from normality, particularly when sample size and variance is equal across groups (Glass et al., 1972; Harwell, 1992; Norman, 2010; Schmider et al., 2010).”
BackgroundSharpley, C. F., & Layton, R. (1998) · Australian Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00050069808257392 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Glass, G. V., Peckham, P. D., & Sanders, J. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Colorado System (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- Indiana University (US)
- ORCID
- Glass, Gene V
- Venue
- Review of Educational Research
- Published
- 1972-09
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 237-288
- ISSN
- 0034-6543 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-1046
- OpenAlex
- W2120106329
- Semantic Scholar
- 96cd4ca99a137bf80e8c2dc5cb20ab6782df819e
- Cited by
- 1,826
- References
- 95
- Citations by year
- 2026: 91 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 72 · 2021: 98 · 2020: 85 · 2019: 96 · 2018: 137 · 2017: 100 · 2016: 106 · 2015: 74 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 70 · 2012: 69
- FWCI
- 10.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Review of Educational Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
- Keywords
- covariance analysis, assumption violations, type I error, type II error, nonparametric statistics, Wilcoxon test, Mann-Whitney test, Kruskal-Wallis test, Friedman test, social science research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review