The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conflict in the Classroom: Controversy and Learning
Abstract
In a social studies class a teacher is presenting a lesson on the United States Congress. The students are discussing in small groups the reasons why citizens want to be representatives in Congress. One student says the major reason is wanting to help your neighbors and your country. Another student says being a member of Congress is just a way to get rich, and quotes Roger Mudd (CBS News, December 24, 1976) that a representative in Congress receives more than $400,000 per year in salary and benefits. Voices rise as the argument continues. What does the teacher do? Would the teacher encourage the argument, helping students find evidence to support and argue their positions? Or would the teacher try to calm things down and change the topic of discussion? Within any learning situation such conflicts among ideas or opinions are inevitable. They will occur no matter what the teacher does. Learning situations are filled with conflicts among students, between the teacher and the student, and between what a student presently understands and new information being learned. And the current evidence indicates that in most classrooms conflicts are avoided and suppressed (DeCecco & Richards, 1974) and that teachers and students lack the skills and procedures needed for effective conflict management (Deutsch, 1973; Blake & Mouton, 1970; Johnson, 1970) By avoiding and suppressing certain types of conflicts teachers lose valuable opportunities to increase student motivation, creative insight, cognitive development, and learning. Conflicts have the potential for producing both
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deutsch, M. (1958) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/002200275800200401 · Cited by 2,077
Cited by
An Educational Psychology Success Story: Social Interdependence Theory and Cooperative Learning
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x09339057 · Cited by 2,721
Self-citationPeer interaction and learning in small groups
Webb, N. M. (1989) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/0883-0355(89)90014-1 · Cited by 1,050
Task-Related Verbal Interaction and Mathematics Learning in Small Groups
Webb, N. M. (1991) · Journal for Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.2307/749186 · Cited by 655
Cooperation and the Use of Technology
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2013) · doi:10.4324/9781410609519-41 · Cited by 518
Self-citationCooperative Learning and Achievement: Theory and Research
Slavin, R. E., Hurley, E. A., & Chamberlain, A. (2003) · Handbook of Psychology · doi:10.1002/0471264385.wei0709 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T.
- Venue
- Review of Educational Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1979
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51
- ISSN
- 0034-6543 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2140756644
- Cited by
- 465
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conflict in the Classroom: Controversy and Learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1169926
- The paper
- Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1979). Conflict in the Classroom: Controversy and Learning. Review of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.2307/1169926
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.