The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nonparametric Tests of Interaction in Experimental Design
Abstract
Until recently the design of experiments in the behavioral and social sciences that focused on interaction effects demanded the use of the parametric analysis of variance. Yet, researchers have been concerned by the presence of nonnormally distributed variables. Although nonparametric statistics are recommended in these situations, researchers often rely on the robustness of parametric tests. Further, often it is assumed that nonparametric methods lack statistical power and that there is a paucity of techniques in more complicated research designs, such as in testing for interaction effects. This paper reviewed (a) research in the past decade and a half that addressed concerns in selecting parametric and nonparametric statistics and (b) 10 recently developed nonparametric techniques for the testing of interactions in experimental design. The review shows that these new techniques are robust, powerful, versatile, and easy to compute. An application of selected nonparametric techniques on fabricated data is provided.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods
Wilcoxon, F. (1945) · Biometrics Bulletin · doi:10.2307/3001968 · Cited by 15,354
Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis
Kruskal, W. H., & Wallis, W. A. (1952) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441 · Cited by 13,912
Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences
Kirk, R. (2013) · doi:10.4135/9781483384733 · Cited by 8,539
Huber, P. J. (1981) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471725250 · Cited by 7,066
On the Theory of Scales of Measurement
Stevens, S. S. (1946) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.103.2684.677 · Cited by 4,761 · cited 1×
“Also, the data need to be measured only on an ordinal scale (Stevens, 1946).”
BackgroundEdgington, E., Edgington, E., & Onghena, P. (2007) · doi:10.1201/9781420011814 · Cited by 2,030
Glass, G. V., Peckham, P. D., & Sanders, J. R. (1972) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543042003237 · Cited by 1,826
Cited by
de Winter, J. C. F., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2016) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000079 · Cited by 1,201
Modern robust statistical methods: An easy way to maximize the accuracy and power of your research.
Erceg-Hurn, D. M., & Mirosevich, V. M. (2008) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.63.7.591 · Cited by 959
Satisfied and unwilling: Exploring cognitive and situational resistance to innovations
Heidenreich, S., Kraemer, T., & Handrich, M. (2016) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.014 · Cited by 105
Kressler, J., Jacobs, K., Burns, P., Betancourt, L., & Nash, M. (2014) · Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation · doi:10.1310/sci2002-113 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Sawilowsky, S. S.
- Venue
- Review of Educational Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1990
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 91
- ISSN
- 0034-6543 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2163167269
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 4.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nonparametric Tests of Interaction in Experimental Design. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1170226
- The paper
- Sawilowsky, S. S. (1990). Nonparametric Tests of Interaction in Experimental Design. Review of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170226
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.