The DOI matches its Crossref record; 103 of the 103 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Contemporary Discourses of Citizenship
Abstract
Meanings of “citizenship,” a concept that has informed teaching practices since nation-states first institutionalized schooling, are shaped over time and through cultural struggles. This article presents a conceptual framework for the discourses that currently construct the meanings of citizenship in contemporary Western cultures, particularly the United States. Using discourse analysis, the authors examine texts related to citizenship and citizenship education from 1990 through 2003, identifying seven distinct but overlapping frameworks that ascribe meaning to citizenship. The “civic republican” and “liberal” frameworks are the most influential in shaping current citizenship education; five others are the most active in contesting the terrain of citizenship practices in lived political arenas. The “transnational” and “critical” discourses have yet to significantly challenge the dominant discourses that shape citizenship education in schools. This article questions the view of political life in Western democracies that is promoted by the dominant discourses of citizenship in K–12 schooling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital
Putnam, R. D. (1995) · Journal of Democracy · doi:10.1353/jod.1995.0002 · Cited by 14,037
Spillane, J. P. (2003) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/01623737025004343 · Cited by 4,286
Hamilton, H., & Marshall, T. H. (1951) · The British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/587460 · Cited by 4,094
A nation at risk: the imperative for educational reform
Denning, P. J. (1983) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/358150.358154 · Cited by 3,925
Liberalism and the Limits of Justice
Sandel, M. J. (1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511810152 · Cited by 3,903
Warner, M. (2002) · Public Culture · doi:10.1215/08992363-14-1-49 · Cited by 3,862
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-3548 · Cited by 2,975
Feminists Theorize the Political
(2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203723999 · Cited by 2,974
Justice and the Politics of Difference
(2011) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvcm4g4q · Cited by 2,872
Culture and Truth: The Remaking of Social Analysis.
Schneider, M., & Rosaldo, R. (1990) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2072842 · Cited by 2,661
Cited by
Democratic Education: A Theoretical Review (2006–2017)
Sant, E. (2019) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654319862493 · Cited by 274
Journell, W. (2008) · The Journal of Social Studies Research · doi:10.1177/235227982008032001005 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Abowitz, K. K., & Harnish, J.
- Venue
- Review of Educational Research
- Published
- 2006-12
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 653-690
- ISSN
- 0034-6543 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-1046
- OpenAlex
- W2099687125
- Cited by
- 587
- References
- 103
- FWCI
- 39.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contemporary Discourses of Citizenship. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3102/00346543076004653
- The paper
- Abowitz, K. K., & Harnish, J. (2006). Contemporary Discourses of Citizenship. Review of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076004653
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.