The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reframing Teacher Professional Learning: An Alternative Policy Approach to Strengthening Valued Outcomes for Diverse Learners
Abstract
This chapter engages in the debate about what counts as professional knowledge from the perspective of improving outcomes for diverse learners. We begin by highlighting the importance of assumptions about appropriate roles for teachers and how those assumptions have shaped the debate about what teachers need to know. Then we consider some myths and evidence about teacher agency that have contributed to a recent international shift in policy attention to the importance of teacher knowledge and, more particularly, how to develop teacher agency and capability. The main focus of the chapter is on a policy approach to building a multidisciplinary evidence base in education that both identifies the kinds of teacher knowledge that has a positive impact on a range of student outcomes and, at the same time, develops that knowledge through a national collaborative knowledge-building and knowledge-use strategy. The approach described is the New Zealand Iterative Best Evidence Synthesis (BES) Programme, which deliberately and systematically draws on and develops a rich multidisciplinary knowledge base in education. We situate our account of this program within (a) a comparison of a range of international policy approaches to strengthening the evidence base informing what teachers need to know, (b) a vision of the role of teaching as responsive to diverse learners and the evolving challenges of the 21st century, and (c) a touchstone of effectiveness as defined by impacts on a range of valued learner outcomes. We present the findings of a new synthesis of the evidence from 97 empirical studies that identify the development of the kinds of teacher knowledge that have a demonstrated positive impact on outcomes for diverse learners. The findings of the synthesis are exemplified through an in-depth case study of effective professional development designed to support student learning, teacher learning, teacher-educator research, and policy learning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform
Shulman, L. (1987) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411 · Cited by 16,787
Assessment and Classroom Learning
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998) · Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice · doi:10.1080/0969595980050102 · Cited by 8,152 · cited 2×
“Much has been written about the “black box” between acts of teaching and student outcomes (Black & Wiliam, 1998) because there is no direct relationship between a particular act of teaching and what students learn.”
BackgroundRestructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups
Cohen, E. G. (1994) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543064001001 · Cited by 2,120
Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.48.12.1181 · Cited by 2,033
The Teacher Research Movement: A Decade Later
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x028007015 · Cited by 1,139 · cited 1×
“This concept is similar to that of Cochran-Smith and Lytle (1999), who argue for the value of teachers’ adopting a deliberate inquiry stance in relation to their own practice where they treat their own work as sites for systematic and intentional inquiry.”
ResultTeacher and Classroom Context Effects on Student Achievement: Implications for Teacher Evaluation
Sanders, W. L., Wright, S. P., & Horn, S. P. (1997) · Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education · doi:10.1023/a:1007999204543 · Cited by 1,044
Rethinking Scale: Moving Beyond Numbers to Deep and Lasting Change
Coburn, C. E. (2003) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x032006003 · Cited by 1,030
Evidence-based policy: the promise of ‘realist synthesis’
Pawson, R. (2002) · Evaluation · doi:10.1177/135638902401462448 · Cited by 729
Cited by
Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008) · Educational Administration Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0013161x08321509 · Cited by 2,549
Conceptualizing Teacher Professional Learning
Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2011) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654311413609 · Cited by 1,814
“Together we are better”: Professional learning networks for teachers
Trust, T., Krutka, D. G., & Carpenter, J. P. (2016) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.06.007 · Cited by 559
Gore, J., Lloyd, A., Smith, M., Bowe, J., Ellis, H., & Lubans, D. (2017) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.08.007 · Cited by 342
Garner, J. K., & Kaplan, A. (2019) · Teachers and Teaching · doi:10.1080/13540602.2018.1533811 · Cited by 182
Metadata
- Authors
- Timperley, H., & Alton-Lee, A.
- Venue
- Review of Research in Education
- Published
- 2008-02
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 328-369
- ISSN
- 0091-732X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-1038
- OpenAlex
- W2098109568
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 44.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reframing Teacher Professional Learning: An Alternative Policy Approach to Strengthening Valued Outcomes for Diverse Learners. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3102/0091732x07308968
- The paper
- Timperley, H., & Alton-Lee, A. (2008). Reframing Teacher Professional Learning: An Alternative Policy Approach to Strengthening Valued Outcomes for Diverse Learners. Review of Research in Education. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732x07308968
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.