The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs
Abstract
In recent years evaluators of educational and social programs have expanded their methodological repertoire with designs that include the use of both qualitative and quantitative methods. Such practice, however, needs to be grounded in a theory that can meaningfully guide the design and implementation of mixed-method evaluations. In this study, a mixed-method conceptual framework was developed from the theoretical literature and then refined through an analysis of 57 empirical mixed-method evaluations. Five purposes for mixed-method evaluations are identified in this conceptual framework: triangulation, complementarity, development, initiation, and expansion. For each of the five purposes, a recommended design is also presented in terms of seven relevant design characteristics. These design elements encompass issues about methods, the phenomena under investigation, paradigmatic framework, and criteria for implementation. In the empirical review, common misuse of the term triangulation was apparent in evaluations that stated such a purpose but did not employ an appropriate design. In addition, relatively few evaluations in this review integrated the different method types at the level of data analysis. Strategies for integrated data analysis are among the issues identified as priorities for further mixed-method work.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The use of a mixed method approach was deemed important to achieve the primary benefits of development and expansion of the checklist (Greene,Caracelli,&Graham,1989).”
From Developing an English Language Textbook Evaluative Checklist (2013) · cites this paper as Greene,Caracelli,&Graham,1989
In the citing paper
“Ironically, in a comprehensive review of mixed-method evaluation studies, Greene and Caracelli (1989) found that methodological triangulation was actually quite rare in mixed-method research, used by only 3 of 57 studies.”
From Revisiting the Quantitative-Qualitative Debate: Implications for Mixed-Methods Research (2002) · cites this paper as Greene and Caracelli, 1989
In the citing paper
“The results were measured through a mixed concurrent or triangulated study [19–21].”
From The virtual patient as a learning tool: a mixed quantitative qualitative study (2018) · cites this paper as [19]
In the citing paper
“Likewise, with Greene et al.’s (1989) initiation purpose, the initiation strand follows the unexpected results that it is supposed to explain.”
From How to Construct a Mixed Methods Research Design (2017) · cites this paper as Greene et al.’s (1989)
In the citing paper
“Greene et al. (1989, p. 259) distinguished the following five purposes for mixing in mixed methods research:”
From How to Construct a Mixed Methods Research Design (2017) · cites this paper as Greene et al. (1989)
In the citing paper
“Bryman’s classification breaks down Greene et al.’s (1989) categories into several aspects, and he adds a number of additional aspects, such as the following:”
From How to Construct a Mixed Methods Research Design (2017) · cites this paper as Greene et al. (1989)
Citations
Cites
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0046016 · Cited by 17,116
Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods
Lotto, L. S., Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1986) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/01623737008003329 · Cited by 10,357
Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action.
Jick, T. D. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392366 · Cited by 7,103
The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods
Fox, W. S., & Denzin, N. K. (1979) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2065439 · Cited by 6,295
Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods
Dijkstra, L. (1985) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(85)90239-5 · Cited by 2,913
Barrett, M. W. (1995) · Evaluation Practice · doi:10.1016/0886-1633(95)90009-8 · Cited by 961
Rossman, G., & Wilson, B. L. (1985) · Evaluation Review · doi:10.1177/0193841x8500900505 · Cited by 945
Brinberg, D. L., Cook, T. D., & Reichardt, C. S. (1981) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.2307/1174260 · Cited by 911
Mathison, S. (1988) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x017002013 · Cited by 762
SMITH, J. K., & HESHUSIUS, L. (1986) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x015001004 · Cited by 675
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- Bower JC, 1986, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association
- Cook TD, 1979, Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research
- Denzin NK, 1978, The research act: An introduction to sociological methods
- Gray P, 1987, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Evaluation Association
- Greene JC, 1987, Proposal for the 1988 annual meeting of the American Education Research Association
- Kidder LH, 1987, Multiple methods in program evaluation: New Directions for Program Evaluation 35, 57
- Knapp MS, 1979, Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research, 118
- Louis KS, 1981, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association
- Mark MM, 1988, Panel presented at the annual meeting of the American Evaluation Association
- Mark MM, 1987, Multiple methods in program evaluation: New Directions for Program Evaluation 35, 95
- Martin GO, 1987, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Evaluation Association
- 10.2307/1174583 · DOI
- Moody PR, 1982, Pitt Meadows physical education project: Evaluation of an implementation project
- Reichardt CS, 1979, Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research, 7
- Reichardt CS, 1987, Multiple methods in program evaluation: New Directions for Program Evaluation 35, 7
- Shotland RL, 1987, Multiple methods in program evaluation: New Directions for Program Evaluation 35, 77
- Smith ML, 1986, Naturalistic evaluation: New Directions for Program Evaluation 30, 37
- Trend MJ, 1979, Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research, 68
- Webb EJ, 1966, Unobtrusive measures
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 1,010
The impact of implementing continuous improvement upon stress within a Lean production framework
Stimec, A., & Grima, F. (2018) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1494391 · Cited by 50
Santuzzi, A. M., Keating, R. T., Martinez, J. J., Finkelstein, L. M., Rupp, D. E., & Strah, N. (2019) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.12320 · Cited by 51
Rodriguez, S. (2019) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.04.025 · Cited by 43
In the transition of energy systems: What lessons can be learnt from the German achievement?
Cheung, G., Davies, P. J., & Bassen, A. (2019) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.05.056 · Cited by 47
Hafner, C. A., & Miller, L. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429452437 · Cited by 42
Tingelhoff, F., Brugger, M., & Leimeister, J. M. (2024) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1177/02683962241304105 · Cited by 60
Using Mixed Methods in South African Psychological Research
Barnes, B. R. (2012) · South African Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1177/008124631204200402 · Cited by 41
Rooting Inquiry in Tradition: The Health Baraza as a Tool for Social Research in Kenya
Yebei, V. N., Sidle, J. E., Frankel, R. M., Ayuku, D., Nyandiko, W. M., & Inui, T. S. (2010) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732310367498 · Cited by 42
The effects of service quality on internet service provider customers’ behaviour
Quach, T. N., Jebarajakirthy, C., & Thaichon, P. (2016) · Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics · doi:10.1108/apjml-03-2015-0039 · Cited by 42
Mixed methodology in family business research: Past accomplishments and perspectives for the future
Reilly, T. M., & Jones, R. (2017) · Journal of Family Business Strategy · doi:10.1016/j.jfbs.2017.08.003 · Cited by 42
Colour, Light, and Materiality: Biophilic Interior Design Presence in Research and Practice
McGee, B., & Park, N. (2022) · Interiority · doi:10.7454/in.v5i1.189 · Cited by 42
Creating better schools through democratic school leadership
Antonio, D. M. S. (2008) · International Journal of Leadership in Education · doi:10.1080/13603120601174311 · Cited by 42
Self-Determination and Success Outcomes of Two-Year College Students with Disabilities
Jameson, D. R. (2007) · Journal of College Reading and Learning · doi:10.1080/10790195.2007.10850196 · Cited by 47
Clarke, M., Killeavy, M., & Moloney, A. (2013) · European Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/02619768.2012.755513 · Cited by 42
Evaluation use at the threshold of the twenty‐first century
Caracelli, V. J. (2000) · New Directions for Evaluation · doi:10.1002/ev.1194 · Cited by 42
Self-citationThe Evolving Classroom: A Study of Traditional and Technology-Based Instruction in a STEM Classroom
Devlin, T. J., Feldhaus, C. R., & Bentrem, K. M. (2013) · Journal of Technology Education · doi:10.21061/jte.v25i1.a.3 · Cited by 41
Choosing an executive coach: The influence of gender on the coach-coachee matching process
Gray, D. E., & Goregaokar, H. (2010) · Management Learning · doi:10.1177/1350507610371608 · Cited by 41
Sense of community, participation, and life satisfaction among Hispanic immigrants in rural Nebraska
Ramos, A. K., Carvajal‐Suarez, M., Leon, M., & Trinidad, N. (2017) · Kontakt · doi:10.1016/j.kontakt.2017.09.005 · Cited by 41
Cultural ecosystem services provision in response to urbanization in Cameroon
Jaligot, R., Mbianda, A. F. K., & Chenal, J. (2018) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.09.013 · Cited by 41
Crilly, N. (2019) · Design Studies · doi:10.1016/j.destud.2019.10.006 · Cited by 43
Evans, M. A., Paterson, C., Wye, L., Chapman, R., Robinson, J., Norton, R., & Bertschinger, R. (2011) · The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine · doi:10.1089/acm.2010.0749 · Cited by 41
Fox, P., Butler, M., Coughlan, B., Murray, M. J., Boland, N., Hanan, T., Murphy, H., Forrester, P., Brien, M. O., & Sullivan, N. O. (2012) · European Journal of Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ejon.2012.10.008 · Cited by 42
Daigneault, P., & Jacob, S. (2013) · Journal of Mixed Methods Research · doi:10.1177/1558689813486190 · Cited by 41
Mom, T. J. M. (2006) · RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) · Cited by 41
Ndenje-Sichalwe, E. (2010) · Cited by 41
Developing the Meta-Inference in Mixed Methods Research through Successive Integration of Claims
Schoonenboom, J. (2022) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429432828-6 · Cited by 41
Educational Accountability: A Qualitatively Driven Mixed-Methods Approach
Hall, J. N., & Ryan, K. E. (2010) · Qualitative Inquiry · doi:10.1177/1077800410389761 · Cited by 40
Morrow, V., Barnett, I., & Vujcich, D. (2013) · Health Policy and Planning · doi:10.1093/heapol/czs134 · Cited by 40
Sahin‐Hodoglugil, N., van der Straten, A., Cheng, H., Montgomery, E., Kacanek, D., Mtetwa, S., Morar, N. S., Munyoro, J., & PADIAN, N. S. (2009) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.08.014 · Cited by 40
Kuo, H., Burnard, P., McLellan, R., Cheng, Y., & Wu, J.-J. (2017) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2017.02.005 · Cited by 42
Systematically comparing methods used to study flow in sport: A longitudinal multiple-case study
Jackman, P. C., Crust, L., & Swann, C. (2017) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.06.009 · Cited by 40
The Circulation of Anti-Austerity Protest
Cammaerts, B. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-70123-3 · Cited by 40
Raman, R., Nguyen, T. K., & Crick, D. (2018) · Journal of International Management · doi:10.1016/j.intman.2018.02.001 · Cited by 40
Pridmore, J., Mols, A., Wang, Y., & Holleman, F. (2018) · The Police Journal Theory Practice and Principles · doi:10.1177/0032258x18768397 · Cited by 40
Consumers' evaluation of imported organic food products: The role of geographical distance
Pedersen, S., Aschemann‐Witzel, J., & Thøgersen, J. B. (2018) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2018.08.016 · Cited by 44
What do parents want from preschool? Perspectives of low-income Latino/a immigrant families
Ansari, A., Pivnick, L., Gershoff, E. T., Crosnoe, R. L., & Orozco-Lapray, D. (2018) · Early Childhood Research Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.08.007 · Cited by 40
Rathmann, K., Vockert, T., Wetzel, L. D., Lutz, J., & Dadaczynski, K. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17082886 · Cited by 40
Partnership with families in early childhood education: Exploratory study
Murphy, C., Matthews, J. M., Clayton, O., & Cann, W. G. (2021) · Australasian Journal of Early Childhood · doi:10.1177/1836939120979067 · Cited by 40
Liu, Y. (2022) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440221079922 · Cited by 63
Non-VA Primary Care Providers' Perspectives on Comanagement for Rural Veterans
Gaglioti, A. H., Cozad, A. J., Wittrock, S., Steffensmeier, K. S., Lampman, M. A., Ono, S. S., Reisinger, H. S., & Charlton, M. E. (2014) · Military Medicine · doi:10.7205/milmed-d-13-00342 · Cited by 40
The relationship between race and library anxiety among graduate students: A replication study
Jiao, Q. G., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Bostick, S. L. (2005) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2005.03.018 · Cited by 40
A Mixed Methods Analysis of Learning in Online Teacher Professional Development: A Case Report
Lebec, M., & Luft, J. A. (2007) · Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education · Cited by 40
Mixed Methods and Causal Analysis
Harding, D. J., & Seefeldt, K. S. (2013) · Handbooks of sociology and social research · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6094-3_6 · Cited by 42
Veth, K. N., Emans, B. J. M., HEIJDEN, B. I. J. M. V. D., Korzilius, H. P. L. M., & de Lange, A. H. (2015) · Human Resource Development Quarterly · doi:10.1002/hrdq.21200 · Cited by 40
Using mixed methods to evaluate perceived quality of care in southern Tanzania
Tancred, T., Schellenberg, J., & Marchant, T. (2016) · International Journal for Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzw002 · Cited by 45
University alumni mentoring programs: a win-win?
Dollinger, M., Arkoudis, S., & Marangell, S. (2019) · Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management · doi:10.1080/1360080x.2019.1617657 · Cited by 46
Mercer, N., Parker, P., Hudson, A., & Martin, D. H. (2019) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2019.101382 · Cited by 39
Corr, C. P., Snodgrass, M. R., Love, H. R., Scott, I. M., Kim, J., & Andrews, L. (2020) · Remedial and Special Education · doi:10.1177/0741932520924030 · Cited by 39
Öztürk, G., Karamete, A., & Çetin, G. (2020) · International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research · doi:10.33200/ijcer.623668 · Cited by 39
Creating customer value from data: foundations and archetypes of analytics-based services
Hunke, F., Heinz, D., & Satzger, G. (2021) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-021-00506-y · Cited by 41
Broekhuizen, T., Delre, S. A., & Torres, A. (2011) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00792.x · Cited by 42
MacGlone, U., Vamvakaris, J., Wilson, G., & MacDonald, R. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.588734 · Cited by 38
Mixed research methods in political science and governance: approaches and applications
Tzagkarakis, S. I., & Kritas, D. (2022) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-022-01384-y · Cited by 38
Adoption of Improved Rice Varieties in the Global South: A Review
Checco, J., Azizan, F. A., Mitchell, J. H., & Aziz, A. A. (2023) · Rice Science · doi:10.1016/j.rsci.2023.03.004 · Cited by 42
Lunde, Å., Heggen, K. M., & Strand, R. (2013) · Journal of Mixed Methods Research · doi:10.1177/1558689812471087 · Cited by 38
Language teachers’ conceptions of assessment: an Egyptian perspective
Gebril, A. (2016) · Teacher Development · doi:10.1080/13664530.2016.1218364 · Cited by 38
Perceptions of Knowledge Sharing Among Small Family Firm Leaders: A Structural Equation Model
Cunningham, J., SEAMAN, C. E. A., & McGuire, D. (2016) · Family Business Review · doi:10.1177/0894486516682667 · Cited by 40
Madden, A., Bailey, C., Alfes, K., & Fletcher, L. (2017) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.21858 · Cited by 39
Cornil, A., López-Fernández, O., Devos, G., de Timary, P., Goudriaan, A. E., & Billieux, J. (2017) · International Gambling Studies · doi:10.1080/14459795.2017.1368686 · Cited by 37
Villadsen, A. R., & Wulff, J. N. (2017) · Academy of Management Discoveries · doi:10.5465/amd.2016.0029 · Cited by 47
Akimowicz, M., Vyn, R. J., Cummings, H., & Landman, K. (2018) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.04.012 · Cited by 38
Toward Rigorous Telecoupling Causal Attribution: A Systematic Review and Typology
Carlson, A. K., Zaehringer, J. G., Garrett, R. D., Silva, R., Furumo, P. R., Rey, A. R., Torres, A., Chung, M. G., Li, Y., & Liu, J. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10124426 · Cited by 43
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Hitchcock, J. H. (2019) · International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches · doi:10.29034/ijmra.v11n1editorial2 · Cited by 40
Kinnebrew, E., Shoffner, E., Farah‐Pérez, A., Mills‐Novoa, M., & Siegel, K. (2020) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.13642 · Cited by 42
Neroni, M. A., Oti, A., & Crilly, N. (2021) · International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation · doi:10.1080/21650349.2021.1929500 · Cited by 48
Betancourt, G., Colarossi, L. G., & Perez, A. (2012) · Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health · doi:10.1007/s10903-012-9588-4 · Cited by 38
Validating an evaluation checklist using a mixed method design
Martz, W. (2009) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.10.005 · Cited by 38
Online class size, note reading, note writing and collaborative discourse
Qiu, M., Hewitt, J., & Brett, C. (2012) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-012-9151-2 · Cited by 38
Lee, M., Pyun, S., Chung, J., Kim, J., Eun, S.-D., & Yoon, B. (2016) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.2522/ptj.20150271 · Cited by 40
Mixed Methods in Strategy Research: Applications and Implications in the Resource-Based View
Molina-Azorín, J. F. (2007) · Research methodology in strategy and management · doi:10.1016/s1479-8387(07)04003-9 · Cited by 36
Jernigan, M. M. (2009) · Cited by 37
Evidential Pluralism in the Social Sciences
Shan, Y., & Williamson, J. (2023) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003143000 · Cited by 40
Molina-Azorín, J. F. (2009) · International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches · doi:10.5172/mra.455.3.1.47 · Cited by 35
Grit within the Context of Career Success: a Mixed Methods Study
Clark, R. S., & Clark, V. L. P. (2019) · International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology · doi:10.1007/s41042-019-00020-9 · Cited by 45
Ivankova, N. V. (2017) · Journal of research in nursing · doi:10.1177/1744987117699655 · Cited by 39
Pluye, P. (2012) · Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal eBooks · doi:10.4000/books.pum.5981 · Cited by 37
Teo, T. P., Hoi, C. K. W., Gao, X. A., & Lv, L. (2019) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12546 · Cited by 37
Parey, B. (2019) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2019.04.007 · Cited by 37
Working in Groups outside the Classroom: Affective Challenges and Probable Solutions
Ferdous, T., & Karim, A. (2019) · International Journal of Instruction · doi:10.29333/iji.2019.12321a · Cited by 40
Competencies urban planning students need to succeed in professional practices
Megahed, G., Elshater, A. M., & Afifi, S. M. Z. (2019) · International Journal of Architectural Research Archnet-IJAR · doi:10.1108/arch-02-2019-0027 · Cited by 37
Rigolon, A., Stewart, W. P., & Gobster, P. H. (2020) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2020.102948 · Cited by 37
Smith, M. H., & Bazis, P. S. (2020) · Journal of Mixed Methods Research · doi:10.1177/1558689820967626 · Cited by 37
Curry, K. T., & Hanson, W. E. (2010) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2010.482006 · Cited by 37
Samarasinghe, S., & Strickert, G. (2012) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.06.008 · Cited by 37
Using Mixed Methods to Study First-Year College Impact on Liberal Arts Learning Outcomes
Seifert, T. A., Goodman, K., King, P. M., & Magolda, M. B. B. (2010) · Journal of Mixed Methods Research · doi:10.1177/1558689810374960 · Cited by 44
Collins, K. M. T., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Johnson, R. B., & Frels, R. K. (2013) · International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches · doi:10.5172/mra.2013.7.2.271 · Cited by 37
Understanding factors influencing employee engagement: a study of the financial sector in Malaysia
Bakar, R. B. A. (2013) · RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) · doi:10.25439/rmt.27339930 · Cited by 37
Paceley, M. S. (2015) · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) · Cited by 36
Feeding distinction: Economic and cultural capital in the making of food boundaries
Oncini, F. (2019) · Poetics · doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2019.02.002 · Cited by 36
Malli, M. A., & Forrester‐Jones, R. (2021) · Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities · doi:10.1007/s10882-021-09829-2 · Cited by 36
Research trend in Sustainable Development Goals reporting: a systematic literature review
Low, S. M., Abdullah, D. F., & Khatib, S. F. A. (2023) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-023-30122-6 · Cited by 37
Bielak, J., & Mystkowska‐Wiertelak, A. (2024) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12950 · Cited by 46
Quality of Extension Services: A Case Study of Farmers in Amathole
Agholor, I. A., Monde, N., Obi, A., & Sunday, O. A. (2013) · Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.5539/jas.v5n2p204 · Cited by 36
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Byers, V. T. (2014) · International Journal of Education · doi:10.5296/ije.v6i1.4399 · Cited by 240
Schneider, J. A., Dandona, R., Pasupneti, S., Lakshmi, V., Liao, C., Yeldandi, V. V., & Mayer, K. H. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011922 · Cited by 38
Applications of mixed-methods methodology in clinical pharmacy research
Hadi, M. A., & Closs, S. J. (2015) · International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy · doi:10.1007/s11096-015-0231-z · Cited by 36
Grob, R., Schlesinger, M. J., Parker, A. M., Shaller, D., Barre, L. R., Martino, S. C., Finucane, M. L., Rybowski, L., & Cerully, J. (2016) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12503 · Cited by 40
Parental Engagement in Online Learning Environments: A Review of the Literature
Stevens, M., & Borup, J. (2015) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s1479-368720150000027005 · Cited by 36
Caplan, N. A., & Stevens, S. G. (2016) · English for Specific Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.esp.2016.11.003 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- Venue
- Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
- Published
- 1989-09
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 255-274
- ISSN
- 0162-3737 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-1062
- OpenAlex
- W2109685530
- Cited by
- 5,687
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 282 · 2025: 266 · 2024: 273 · 2023: 300 · 2022: 321 · 2021: 377 · 2020: 322 · 2019: 300 · 2018: 266 · 2017: 286 · 2016: 314 · 2015: 336 · 2014: 328 · 2013: 300 · 2012: 279
- FWCI
- 6.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
- Keywords
- conceptual framework, evaluation design, triangulation, complementarity, program evaluation, educational program evaluation, social program evaluation, integrated data analysis, design features
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
