The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Collective Sensemaking about Reading: How Teachers Mediate Reading Policy in Their Professional Communities
Abstract
Recent research on the relationship between instructional policy and classroom practice suggests that teachers interpret, adapt, and even transform policies as they put them into place. This paper extends this line of research, using an in-depth case study of one California elementary school to examine the processes by which teachers construct and reconstruct multiple policy messages about reading instruction in the context of their professional communities. Drawing primarily on institutional and sensemaking theory, this paper puts forth a model of collective sensemaking that focuses on the ways teachers co-construct understandings of policy messages, make decisions about which messages to pursue in their classrooms, and negotiate the technical and practical details of implementation in conversations with their colleagues. It also argues that the nature and structure of formal networks and informal alliances among teachers shape the process, with implications for ways in which messages from the policy environment influence classroom practice. Finally, the paper explores the role school leaders play in shaping the sensemaking process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Barley, S. R. (1986) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392767 · Cited by 2,315
Cited by
Conceptualizing Teacher Professional Learning
Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2011) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654311413609 · Cited by 1,814
Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward
Maitlis, S., & Christianson, M. (2014) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2014.873177 · Cited by 1,764
Rethinking Scale: Moving Beyond Numbers to Deep and Lasting Change
Coburn, C. E. (2003) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x032006003 · Cited by 1,030
Self-citationResearch on Data Use: A Framework and Analysis
Coburn, C. E., & Turner, E. O. (2011) · Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives · doi:10.1080/15366367.2011.626729 · Cited by 365
Self-citationData in Practice: Conceptualizing the Data-Based Decision-Making Phenomena
Spillane, J. P. (2012) · American Journal of Education · doi:10.1086/663283 · Cited by 308
Metadata
- Authors
- Coburn, C. E.
- Venue
- Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 145-170
- ISSN
- 0162-3737 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-1062
- OpenAlex
- W2098371579
- Cited by
- 1,179
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 35.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Collective Sensemaking about Reading: How Teachers Mediate Reading Policy in Their Professional Communities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3102/01623737023002145
- The paper
- Coburn, C. E. (2001). Collective Sensemaking about Reading: How Teachers Mediate Reading Policy in Their Professional Communities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737023002145
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.