Cited by 831

Effects of Professional Development on Teachers’ Instruction: Results from a Three-year Longitudinal Study

Desimone, Laura M, Porter, Andrew C., Garet, Michael S., Yoon, Kwang Suk, Birman, Beatrice F.·2002·Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis

Abstract

This article examines the effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction. Using a purposefully selected sample of about 207 teachers in 30 schools, in 10 districts in five states, we examine features of teachers’ professional development and its effects on changing teaching practice in mathematics and science from 1996–1999. We found that professional development focused on specific instructional practices increases teachers’ use of those practices in the classroom. Furthermore, we found that specific features, such as active learning opportunities, increase the effect of the professional development on teacher’s instruction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3102/01623737024002081

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Professional development is most effective when it provides teachers active learning opportunities that are intensive, focused on discrete skills, aligned with curriculum and assessments, and applied in context.

    “Studies find that professional development is most effective when it provides teachers active learning opportunities that are intensive, focused on discrete skills, aligned with curriculum and assessments, and applied in context (Correnti, 2007; Desimone, 2009; Desimone, Porter, Garet, Yoon, & Birman, 2002; Garet, Porter, Desimone, Birman, & Yoon, 2001; Wayne, Yoon, Zhu, Cronen, & Garet, 2008).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Desimone, L. M., Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Yoon, K. S., & Birman, B. F.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University
  • University of Wisconsin, Madison
  • American Institutes for Research
Venue
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
Published
2002-06
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
81-112
ISSN
  • 0162-3737
  • 1935-1062
Cited by
831
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review