Cited by 21Educational Assessment and ImprovementEvaluation and Performance AssessmentTeacher Education and Leadership Studies

Implementation of a collaborative data use model in a United States context

Open access
Jimerson, Jo Beth, Garry, Vanessa, Poortman, Cindy L., Schildkamp, Kim·2021·Studies in Educational Evaluation

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100866

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 61 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jimerson, J. B., Garry, V., Poortman, C. L., & Schildkamp, K.
Affiliations
  • Texas Christian University (US)
  • University of Missouri–St. Louis (US)
  • University of Twente (NL)
Corresponding author
Jimerson, Jo Beth
Venue
Studies in Educational Evaluation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-06
Volume
69
Pages
100866
ISSN
0191-491X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3011294805
Cited by
21
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4
FWCI
2.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Studies In Educational Evaluation (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Spencer Foundation (201800054)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Keywords
data teams, implementation barriers, education policy, school leadership, elementary school, academic underachievement, problems of practice, school accountability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review