CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 315Youth Substance Use and School AttendanceSchool Choice and PerformanceEducational Outcomes and Influences

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Excused Versus Unexcused: How Student Absences in Elementary School Affect Academic Achievement

Gottfried, Michael A.·2009·Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
DOI 10.3102/0162373709342467
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The literature on school absences has focused predominantly on the reasons for student truancy, or it has assessed only aggregate student absences in their effect on achievement. However, this study brings forth a new issue: the relationship between types of absences—excused versus unexcused—and school performance. With a quantitative model of educational achievement on a longitudinal multilevel data set of all second-through fourth-grade students in the Philadelphia School District from 1994 to 2000, this study disaggregated absence information to provide new insight on the attendance–achievement relationship. Specifically, a model using fixed effects with classroom-level clustering was employed to determine how the distinction among varying proportions of excused versus unexcused absences related to students’ standardized test performance in reading and math. This article demonstrates that distinguishing between students with high rates of excused or unexcused absences is significant. Having a higher proportion of excused absences to total absences exhibits a positive relationship between reading and math test scores. Conversely, students with a higher proportion of unexcused absences places them at academic risk, particularly in math achievement and as early as in elementary school. Implications for policy are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3102/0162373709342467

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 60 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Balanz R, 2004, Locating the dropout crisis
  2. Bealing V, 1990, Maladjustment and Therapeutic Education, 8, 19
  3. deJung JK, 1986, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association
  4. Epstein JL, 2001, School and family partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools
  5. Ferguson RF, 1991, Harvard Journal of Legislation, 28, 465
  6. Fine M, 1994, Chartering urban school reform, 5
  7. 10.3102/00346543059002117 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Finn JD, 1993, School engagement and students at risk
  9. Hallfors D, 2002, Journal of Social Health, 72, 205
  10. Hess GA, 1989, Against the odds: The early identification of dropouts
  11. Johnson GM, 2005, Educational Technology and Society, 8, 179
  12. Roby DE, 2004, Educational Research Quarterly, 28, 3
  13. Rothman S, 2001, International Education Journal, 2, 59

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 315

Related

Metadata

Authors
Gottfried, M. A.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Gottfried, Michael A.
ORCID
Gottfried, Michael A.
Venue
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
Publisher
American Educational Research Association (AERA)
Published
2009-12
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
392-415
ISSN
  • 0162-3737 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-1062
DOI
10.3102/0162373709342467
OpenAlex
W2067044158
Cited by
315
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 11
FWCI
29.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Youth Substance Use and School Attendance
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
Keywords
school absenteeism, excused absences, unexcused absences, school attendance, academic performance, elementary school students, standardized test scores, reading achievement, mathematics achievement, academic risk, School District of Philadelphia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review