Cited by 105Higher Education Research StudiesCareer Development and DiversityCritical Race Theory in Education

College graduation rates for minority students in a selective technical university: Will participation in a summer bridge program contribute to success?

Open access
Murphy, Terrence E., Gaughan, Monica, Hume, Robert, Moore, S. Gordon·2010·Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis

Abstract

There are many approaches to solving the problem of underrepresentation of some racial and ethnic groups and women in scientific and technical disciplines. Here, the authors evaluate the association of a summer bridge program with the graduation rate of underrepresented minority (URM) students at a selective technical university. They demonstrate that this 5-week program prior to the fall of the 1st year contains elements reported as vital for successful student retention. Using multivariable survival analysis, they show that for URM students entering as fall-semester freshmen, relative to their nonparticipating peers, participation in this accelerated summer bridge program is associated with higher likelihood of graduation. The longitudinal panel data include more than 2,200 URM students.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3102/0162373709360064

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Anderson-Rowland M Reyes M McCartney M 1998 MEP summer bridge program: Mathematics assessment strategies Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference Washington, DC
  2. Attinasi LC 1989 Getting in: Mexican Americans’ perceptions of university attendance and the implications for freshman year persistence The Journal of Higher Education 60 3 247 277
  3. Black student college graduation rates inch higher but a large racial gap persists 2007 The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education Retrieved January 9, 2010, from http://www.jbhe.com/preview/winter07preview.html
  4. Bowen WG Bok D 1998 The shape of the river: Long-term consequences of considering race in college and university admissions Princeton, NJ Princeton University Press
  5. Butler A Hicks P 2006 6 18–21 Student diversity at the Mercer University School of Engineering: Retention and graduation Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Chicago, IL
  6. Campbell G Denes R Morrison C 2000 Access denied: Race, ethnicity, and the scientific enterprise New York Oxford University Press
  7. Chimka JR Reed-Rhoads T Barker K 2008 Proportional hazards models of graduation Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice 9 2 221 232
  8. Cox DR 1972 Regression models and life tables (with discussion) Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 34 187 220
  9. Eagan MK Jr 2006 Examining the influence of involvement on degree completion among Black students by gender Unpublished master’s thesis North Carolina State University Raleigh, NC
  10. French BF Immekus JC Oakes WC 2005 An examination of indicators of engineering students’ success and persistence Journal of Engineering Education 94 4 419 425
  11. Johnson MJ Sheppard SD 2004 Relationships between engineering student and faculty demographics and stakeholders working to affect change Journal of Engineering Education 93 2 139 151
  12. Lam PC Doverspike D Mawasha RP 1999 Predicting success in a minority engineering program Journal of Engineering Education 88 3 265 267 367 369 370
  13. May GS Chubin DE 2003 A retrospective on undergraduate engineering success for under-represented minority students Journal of Engineering Education 92 1 27 39
  14. National Academy of Sciences 2006 Biological, social and organizational components of success for women in academic science and engineering Washington, DC National Academies Press 20669444
  15. National Academy of Sciences 2007 Beyond bias and barriers: Fulfilling the potential of women in academic science and engineering Washington, DC National Academies Press 20669424
  16. National Research Council 2006 To recruit and advance: Women students and faculty in science and engineering Washington, DC National Academies Press
  17. Ohland MW Zhang G 2002 A study of the impact of minority engineering programs at the FAMU-FSU College of Engineering Journal of Engineering Education 91 4 435 440
  18. Pearson W Fechter A 1994 Who will do science? Educating the next generation Baltimore Johns Hopkins University Press
  19. Reichert M Absher M 1997 Taking another look at educating African American engineers: The importance of undergraduate retention Journal of Engineering Education 86 3 241 253
  20. Sanchez AR King M 1986 Mexican Americans’ use of counseling services: Cultural and institutional factors Journal of College Student Personnel 27 4 344 349
  21. Takahira S Goodings DJ Byrnes JP 1998 Retention and performance of male and female engineering students: An examination of academic and environmental variables Journal of Engineering Education 87 3 297 304
  22. Tinto V 1975 Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research Review of Educational Research 45 89 125
  23. Trippi J Cheatham HE 1991 Counseling effects on African American college students’ graduation Journal of College Student Development 32 4 342 349
  24. Watson K Froyd J 2007 Diversifying the U.S. engineering workforce: A new model Journal of Engineering Education 96 1 19 32
  25. Zhang G Anderson TJ Ohland MW Thorndyke BR 2004 Identifying factors influencing engineering student graduation: A longitudinal and cross-institutional study Journal of Engineering Education 93 4 313 320

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murphy, T. E., Gaughan, M., Hume, R., & Moore, S. G.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
Published
2010-03
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
70-83
ISSN
  • 0162-3737 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-1062
OpenAlex
W2165241430
Cited by
105
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4
FWCI
8.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (P30AG021342)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
Keywords
summer bridge programs, underrepresented minority students, graduation rates, student retention, underrepresentation in STEM, women in STEM, first-year students, survival analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review