Cited by 140Higher Education Research StudiesEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

The role of a skills learning support program on first-generation college students’ self-regulation, motivation, and academic achievement: a longitudinal study.

Wibrowski, Connie R., Matthews, Wendy K., Kitsantas, Anastasia·2017·Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice

Abstract

The purpose of this longitudinal study was to assess the impact of the Skills Learning Support Program (SLSP) aimed to support entering first-generation college students’ motivational beliefs, use of self-regulatory strategies, and academic achievement. The study included 137 students from ethnically diverse cultural backgrounds who were in need of academic, counseling, and financial support. In addition, the study gathered academic data on 739 admitted students who did not participate in the program for comparison. The SLSP students were asked to respond to a number of scales assessing their self-regulation and motivational beliefs at the beginning and end of their freshmen year. Comparison academic data were also collected for all students during the next 4 years until graduation. It was hypothesized that students who participated in the SLSP would experience an increase in their academic self-regulation and motivation by the end of the first year. In addition, it was expected that students in the SLSP group would show similar or higher levels of achievement and graduation rates when compared with other freshman students admitted the same year. Findings revealed that students who enrolled in SLSP reported higher levels of motivation and study skills from the pretest to the posttest assessments. In addition, students enrolled in the program exhibited levels of academic achievement similar to or higher than regularly admitted college freshman during their first year and as they approached graduation. However, these differences in the two groups diminished by the time students graduated. These findings may have important implications for instructors, students, and college administrators.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1521025116629152

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wibrowski, C. R., Matthews, W. K., & Kitsantas, A.
Affiliations
  • The Graduate Center, CUNY (US)
  • Wayne State University (US)
  • George Mason University (US)
Corresponding author
Matthews, Wendy K.
Venue
Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice
Published
2016-02-05
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
317-332
ISSN
  • 1521-0251 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-4167
OpenAlex
W2408984491
Cited by
140
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 2
FWCI
50.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of College Student Retention Research Theory & Practice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
first-generation college students, academic self-regulation, student motivation, academic performance, study skills, academic support programs, college retention, graduation rates, ethnic diversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review