The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Magnitude, Destinations, and Determinants of Mathematics and Science Teacher Turnover
Abstract
This study examines the magnitude, destinations, and determinants of mathematics and science teacher turnover. The data are from the nationally representative Schools and Staffing Survey and the Teacher Follow-Up Survey. Over the past two decades, rates of mathematics and science teacher turnover have increased but, contrary to conventional wisdom, have not been consistently different than those of other teachers. Also, contrary to conventional wisdom, mathematics and science teachers were also no more likely than other teachers to take noneducation jobs, such as in technological fields or to be working for private business or industry. The data also show there are large school-to-school differences in mathematics and science turnover; high-poverty, high-minority, and urban public schools have among the highest rates. In the case of cross-school migration, the data show there is an annual asymmetric reshuffling of a significant portion of the mathematics and science teaching force from poor to not-poor schools, from high-minority to low-minority schools, and from urban to suburban schools. A number of key organizational characteristics and conditions of schools accounted for these school differences. The strongest factor for mathematics teachers was the degree of individual classroom autonomy held by teachers. Net of other factors such as salaries, schools with less classroom autonomy lose math teachers at a far higher rate than other teachers. In contrast, for science teachers salary was the strongest factor, while classroom autonomy was not strongly related to their turnover.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education
Becker, G. S. (1993) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226041223.001.0001 · Cited by 4,509
Griffeth, R. W., Hom, P. W., & Gaertner, S. (2000) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920630002600305 · Cited by 4,001
A nation at risk: the imperative for educational reform
Denning, P. J. (1983) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/358150.358154 · Cited by 3,925
(1970) · Cited by 3,618
Gill, J. (2005) · Encyclopedia of Social Measurement · doi:10.1016/b0-12-369398-5/00166-3 · Cited by 3,114
Job Matching and the Theory of Turnover
Jovanovic, B. (1979) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/260808 · Cited by 3,092
Teacher Turnover and Teacher Shortages: An Organizational Analysis
Ingersoll, R. M. (2001) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312038003499 · Cited by 2,989 · cited 2×
“In contrast to this historical focus on understanding the factors that attract individuals to teaching and the means to recruit new candidates into the occupation, there has been relatively less attention paid to the role of teacher turnover, migration, mobility, and attrition in these staffing problems (Hirsch et al.…”
BackgroundSelf-citationGunderman, R. B. (2011) · Achieving Excellence in Medical Education · doi:10.1007/978-0-85729-307-7_10 · Cited by 2,892
A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform
(1983) · The Elementary School Journal · doi:10.1086/461348 · Cited by 2,341
(1984) · Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government) · Cited by 1,848
Cited by
Teacher Well-Being: Exploring Its Components and a Practice-Oriented Scale
Collie, R. J., Shapka, J. D., Perry, N. E., & Martin, A. J. (2015) · Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment · doi:10.1177/0734282915587990 · Cited by 225
Teacher Evaluation Policy and Conflicting Theories of Motivation
Firestone, W. A. (2014) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x14521864 · Cited by 159
Current Knowledge on the Nature, Prevalence, Sources and Potential Impact of Teacher Stress
Travers, C. (2017) · Aligning Perspectives on Health, Safety and Well-Being · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-53053-6_2 · Cited by 126
Fernet, C., Trépanier, S.-G., Austin, S., & Levesque-Côté, J. (2016) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.019 · Cited by 126
Becoming an urban science teacher: How beginning teachers negotiate contradictory school contexts
Marco‐Bujosa, L. M., McNeill, K. L., & Friedman, A. A. (2020) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21583 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Ingersoll, R. M., & May, H.
- Venue
- Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
- Published
- 2012-12
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 435-464
- ISSN
- 0162-3737 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-1062
- OpenAlex
- W2001224591
- Cited by
- 342
- References
- 82
- FWCI
- 69.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Magnitude, Destinations, and Determinants of Mathematics and Science Teacher Turnover. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3102/0162373712454326
- The paper
- Ingersoll, R. M., & May, H. (2012). The Magnitude, Destinations, and Determinants of Mathematics and Science Teacher Turnover. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373712454326
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.