Cited by 140Education Discipline and InequalityLegal Issues in EducationCritical Race Theory in Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Estimating the Effect of State Zero Tolerance Laws on Exclusionary Discipline, Racial Discipline Gaps, and Student Behavior

Curran, F. Chris·2016·Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis

Abstract

Zero tolerance discipline policies have come under criticism as contributors to racial discipline gaps; however, few studies have explicitly examined such policies. This study utilizes data from two nationally representative data sources to examine the effect of state zero tolerance laws on suspension rates and principal perceptions of problem behaviors. Utilizing state and year fixed effects models, this study finds that state zero tolerance laws are predictive of a 0.5 percentage point increase in district suspension rates and no consistent decreases in principals’ perceptions of problem behaviors. Furthermore, the results indicate that the laws are predictive of larger increases in suspension rates for Blacks than Whites, potentially contributing to the Black–White suspension gap. Implications for policy and practice are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3102/0162373716652728

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 44 references

1 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Beccaria C., 1983, An essay on crimes and punishment
  2. Bronfenbrenner U., 2006, Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development, 793
  3. Dilulio J. J., 2005, Encyclopedia of prisons and correctional facilities, 233
  4. Feistritzer C. E., 2011, Profile of teachers in the U.S. 2011
  5. Meier K. J., 1993, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3, 393
  6. Paternoster R., 2010, The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 100, 765
  7. Richards J., 2004, University of Dayton Law Review, 30, 91
  8. Rocque M., 2011, The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 101, 633

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–140 of 140

Metadata

Authors
Curran, F. C.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, Baltimore County (US)
Corresponding author
Curran, F. Chris
Venue
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
Published
2016-07-07
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
647-668
ISSN
  • 0162-3737 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-1062
OpenAlex
W2418407068
Cited by
140
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1
FWCI
65.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal Issues in Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
Keywords
zero tolerance laws, student discipline, school suspension, student behavior, school discipline policy, state education policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review