The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multilevel Item Response Models: An Approach to Errors in Variables Regression
Abstract
In this article we show how certain analytic problems that arise when one attempts to use latent variables as outcomes in regression analyses can be addressed by taking a multilevel perspective on item response modeling. Under a multilevel, or hierarchical, perspective we cast the item response model as a within-student model and the student population distribution as a between-student model. Taking this perspective leads naturally to an extension of the student population model to include a range of student-level variables, and it invites the possibility of further extending the models to additional levels so that multilevel models can be applied with latent outcome variables. In the two-level case, the model that we employ is formally equivalent to the plausible value procedures that are used as part of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), but we present the method for a different class of measurement models, and we use a simultaneous estimation method rather than two-step estimation. In our application of the models to the appropriate treatment of measurement error in the dependent variable of a between-student regression, we also illustrate the adequacy of some approximate procedures that are used in NAEP.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Rasch model for partial credit scoring
Masters, G. N. (1982) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02296272 · Cited by 3,782
Empirical bayes meta-analysis.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (1985) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.3102/10769986010002075 · Cited by 299
Cited by
Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology.
(2006) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/11383-000 · Cited by 481
Bayesian Estimation of a Multilevel IRT Model Using Gibbs Sampling
Fox, J.-P., & Glas, C. A. W. (2001) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02294839 · Cited by 398
A conceptual and psychometric framework for distinguishing categories and dimensions
De Boeck, P., Wilson, M., & Acton, G. S. (2005) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.112.1.129 · Cited by 131
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Adams, R. J., Wilson, M., & Wu, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics
- Published
- 1997-03
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 47-76
- ISSN
- 1076-9986 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-1054
- OpenAlex
- W2113338391
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multilevel Item Response Models: An Approach to Errors in Variables Regression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3102/10769986022001047
- The paper
- Adams, R. J., Wilson, M., & Wu, M. (1997). Multilevel Item Response Models: An Approach to Errors in Variables Regression. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986022001047
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.