Cited by 36Smart Grid Security and ResilienceNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionInformation and Cyber Security

A SCADA testbed for investigating cyber security vulnerabilities in critical infrastructures

Tesfahun, Abebe, Bhaskari, D. Lalitha·2016·Automatic Control and Computer Sciences

Abstract

Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) systems are widely used in critical infrastructures such as water distribution networks, electricity generation and distribution plants, oil refineries, nuclear plants, and public transportation systems. However, the increased use of standard protocols and interconnectivity has exposed SCADA systems for potential cyber-attacks. In recent years, the cyber-security of SCADA systems has become a hot issue for governments, industrial sectors and academic community. Recently some security solutions have been proposed to secure SCADA systems. However, due to the critical nature of SCADA systems, evaluation of such proposed solutions on real system is im-practical. In this paper, we proposed an easily scalable and reconfigurable virtual SCADA security testbed, which can be used for developing and evaluating SCADA specific security solutions. With Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) and false data injection attack scenarios, we demonstrated how attackers could disrupt the normal operation of SCADA systems. Experimental results show that, the pro-posed testbed can be effectively used for cyber security assessment and vulner-ability investigation on SCADA systems. One of the outcomes of this work is a labeled dataset, which can be used by researchers in the area of SCADA security.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3103/s0146411616010090

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Stateful analysis compares predetermined acceptable protocol behaviours against observed activities to detect deviations or intrusions.

    “Stateful analysis compares predetermined acceptable protocol behaviours against observed activities to detect deviations or intrusions.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 19 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tesfahun, A., & Bhaskari, D. L.
Affiliations
Andhra University (IN)
Corresponding author
Tesfahun, Abebe
Venue
Automatic Control and Computer Sciences
Published
2016-01
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
54-62
ISSN
  • 0146-4116 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-108X
OpenAlex
W2471947132
Cited by
36
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
3.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Automatic Control and Computer Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Smart Grid Security and Resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
Keywords
SCADA security, virtual testbed, vulnerability assessment, DDoS attacks, false data injection attacks, cyberattacks, annotated dataset

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review