Cited by 3Atmospheric aerosols and cloudsMeteorological Phenomena and SimulationsClimate Change and Geoengineering

A field experiment on modeling the impact of aerosol layers on the variability of solar insolation and meteorological characteristics of the surface layer

Izrael, Yu. A., Zakharov, V. M., Ivanov, V. N., Petrov, N. N., Andreev, Yu. V., Gulevskii, V. A., Danilyan, B. G., Eran’kov, V. G. +7 more·2011·Russian Meteorology and Hydrology

Abstract

Described are the results of a field experiment carried out in 2010 on studying the impact of artificial aerosol formations on the solar insolation intensity and thermal characteristics of the atmospheric surface layer. The composition of the measuring equipment complex is given and the results of the experiment and its theoretical analysis are presented. It is demonstrated that the solar radiation flux decrease results in rather rapid response of the surface air layer manifesting itself in the considerable decrease in temperature and turbulent heat fluxes. The theoretical estimates corroborate the obtained experimental data. The field experiment is the continuation of researches carried out in 2008 and 2009.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3103/s106837391111001x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Unlike natural plumes with uncertain sources, the Russian experiments enabled precise quantification of injected mass and particle properties, establishing cause-effect relationships between controlled emissions and radiative/thermal responses.

    “Unlike natural plumes with uncertain sources, these experiments enabled precise quantification of injected mass and particle properties, establishing cause-effect relationships between controlled emissions and radiative/thermal responses (Izrael et al., 2009a, 2011).”
  • The Russian trials demonstrated rapid reversibility, with observed near-surface air temperature rebounds of ~0.3-0.4°C occurring within hours, as the submicron aerosols dispersed rapidly in the lower atmosphere.

    “The Russian trials demonstrated rapid reversibility, with observed near-surface air temperature rebounds of ∼ 0.3-0.4 ◦ Coccurring within hours, as the submicron aerosols dispersed rapidly in the lower atmosphere (Izrael et al., 2011).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Izrael, Y. A., Zakharov, V. M., Ivanov, V. N., Petrov, N. N., Andreev, Y. V., Gulevskii, V. A., Danilyan, B. G., Eran’kov, V. G., Kirin, D. V., Kulyapin, V. P., Rusakov, Y. S., Savchenko, A. V., Svirkunov, P. N., Severov, D. A., & Folomeev, V. V.
Affiliations
Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
Venue
Russian Meteorology and Hydrology
Published
2011-11
Volume
36
Issue
11
Pages
705-711
ISSN
  • 1068-3739 (ISSN-L)
  • 1934-8096
OpenAlex
W2163627871
Cited by
3
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Russian Meteorology and Hydrology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
Keywords
aerosol layers, solar irradiation, surface layer, atmospheric boundary layer, solar flux, surface air temperature, turbulent heat flux, aerosol-climate interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review