Cited by 11Global Maternal and Child HealthMaternal and fetal healthcareMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

Recording of maternal deaths in an East African university hospital

Open access
BERGSJØ, PER, VANGEN, SIRI, LIE, ROLV TERJE, LYATUU, ROWLAND, LIE‐NIELSEN, ERIK, ONEKO, OLOLA·2010·Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Abstract

Objective. To trace all maternal deaths at a tertiary East African university hospital with a systematic registration of all births. Design. Descriptive study. Sample. One hundred and nineteen cases of maternal death which occurred in the period from 2000 to 2007 (including). Methods. Identification through the birth registry and separate manual tracing of all case records. Account of practical problems concerning identification of cases and analysis of time trends, mothers' domicile, occurrence by phase of pregnancy, birth and puerperium, and diagnoses. Results. There was considerable under‐reporting of deaths in the medical birth registry. Twenty of 119 mothers died before 23 weeks' gestational age, most of them of unsafe abortion. Other prevalent direct causes of death were hemorrhage, eclampsia and other hypertensive complications. HIV/AIDS was primary cause in 20 cases. Conclusion. Even with relatively complete ascertainment of births, single hospital‐based medical birth registries have limitations in studies of maternal deaths. They may identify risks among women who arrive for delivery at the hospital, but are not well suited for estimation of total maternal mortality within the hospital walls. This would require additional data. Extending the birth registry monitoring system to all health institutions with obstetrical services in a region will give more reliable estimates to be followed over time and serve as a basis for regular auditing, to the benefit of mothers and their children.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/00016341003801664

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Tanzania, a review of 113 maternal deaths suggested that 14 (12%) women had died following an unsafe abortion.

    “In Tanzania, a recent review of 113 maternal deaths suggested that 14 (12%) women had died following an unsafe abortion (24),”

    From Unsafe abortion and postabortion care - an overview (2011) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Results state that 14 women died following unsafe abortion, and 14 of the study’s 119 maternal deaths is approximately 12%. The cited paper reports 119 deaths, not the 113 stated in the citing sentence. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.92)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Moland KM. Giving birth in Kilimanjaro. The politics of knowledge in moral contexts. Doctoral thesis. Bergen: Department of Administration and Organisation Theory and Centre for International Health, University of Bergen, 2002:280 pages. ISBN 82-7815-08-5.
  2. Olsen BE, Hinderaker SG, Bergsjø P, Lie RT, Olsen OH, Gasheka P, et al.Causes and characteristics of maternal deaths in rural northern Tanzania. Paper III in: Olsen BE. Motherhood -a hazardous endeavour. Doctoral thesis. Bergen: University of Bergen, Norway, Centre for Interna- tional Health, 2002. ISBN 82-7815-073-7.
  3. Mbaruku G, van Roosmalen J, Kamugisha C, Nturugelewa E, Bergström S. Perceptions of obstetric risk among health staff, traditional birth attendants and community members in rural Tanzania. Paper III in: Mbaruku G. Enhancing survival of mothers and their newborns in Tanzania. Doctoral thesis. Stockholm: Karolinska University Press, 2005. ISBN 91-7140-355-8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BERGSJØ, P., VANGEN, S., LIE, R. T., LYATUU, R., LIE‐NIELSEN, E., & ONEKO, O.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO)
  • University of Bergen (NO)
  • Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre (TZ)
Corresponding author
BERGSJØ, PER
Venue
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-06
Volume
89
Issue
6
Pages
789-793
ISSN
  • 0001-6349 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0412
OpenAlex
W2153032994
Cited by
11
References
4
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Universitetet i Bergen
  • Council for Higher Education
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
maternal mortality, birth registry, underreporting, unsafe abortion, hemorrhage, eclampsia, hypertension complications, HIV/AIDS, miscarriage, postpartum period, East Africa
MeSH terms
Cause of Death, Developing Countries, Female, Hospitals, University, Humans, Maternal Mortality, Pregnancy, Registries, Tanzania

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review